Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10983 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

bobby6464

Clearfield, PA

#693 Apr 13, 2013
local yocal wrote:
its called plagarizing and dan the dolt did it all the time and then calls david a copy and paste guy. PRICELESS!
um bobby6464 and um dumb at tims specality whn i dinks my bear. i think um goin to be born agin like dantheman hes my hero

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#694 Apr 13, 2013
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>Here's a little advice. Look up the information FIRST...then question the poster...provided you are correct. Otherwise if you accuse someone of something that they did not do it makes you look impulsive, irresponsible and not very credible. How many other posters have you wrongfully accused?
I still don't know what you are talking about when you say this "It's okay for the heads of the Republican Party to be for (rape/voter intimitation/etc) so long there is one non political black guy somewhere who does something similiar".....You keep dwelling on the GOP as pro rape that hates black people. I honestly think you have serious problems. Sure there are weirdos out there but they aren't all republicans. Some are democrats, some are green party members, some are nothing, and on and on. You just have this weird obsession of hate for republicans. I just hope you don't explode someday and hurt some one. I don't know who you are but if I did, I would report you to the authorities because all the signs are there.
Actually, I was going to apologize for getting it wrong, but I see now that you are just lying.

Let me guess, you're going to claim that "someone else was using the same log in as me".

If you don't want to be held responsible for arguments posted under this name and location, then you need to register the name and location so other people can't use it.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#695 Apr 13, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>I don't need to "pretend" that I'm more intelligent than you are. Here again, the facts are what they are. Not my fault you're slow. My argument has nothing to do with weapons being equal in the sense that you imply. My argument is that all weapons are capable of being abused by the stupid and the criminal. If one isn't available another will be abused. Are the victims any less dead if they are blown up, shot with a pistol, firebombed, or shot with a bolt action rifle than they are when shot with an "assault weapon"? Take your fight to the source of the problem; the crazies, the stupids, and the criminals. Leave the honest law abiding gun owner alone.
Yes, I know what your argument is. I know that your argument fails to address the key point.

You are saying: "Hey, if the Newtown shooter didn't have an assault rifle, he could have done just as much damage with (other weapon)."

In THIS post you make that claim about a bolt action rifle.
In the previous post you make that claim about a balista.

Here's the PROBLEM with your argument:

RATE OF FIRE

Are you familiar with the term? Look it up.

The RATE OF FIRE of a semi automatic assault rifle is HIGHER than a bolt action rifle. It's MUCH MUCH MUCH higher than a balista.

The kids at Newtown were not glued to the floor.

Giving a shooter the ability to shoot off 30 rounds in 10 seconds means that a shooter can...

SHOOT 30 ROUNDS in 10 seconds.

Giving the SAME shooter the ability to shoot only 1 round in 10 seconds means that that shooter can...

SHOOT ONLY 1 ROUND.

Given the SAME amount of time, the shooter can't shoot as many people.

Get it?

Can I explain it SLOWER? Would that help you?

The Newtown shooters gun was purchased LEGALLY. IT was owned LEGALLY. Just like the guns used in Virgina Tech, Columbine, Colorado and probably 90% of the rest of the mass shootings.

If "leaving" gun owners alone would mean no mass shootings, then great. The problem is that law abiding gun owners are still CAUSING THE SHOOTINGS by making the guns available to the crazy people.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#696 Apr 13, 2013
DavidQ762 wrote:
(1856).
"
Again, MEANINGLESS to this discussion.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#697 Apr 13, 2013
DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."
Not what it says in the Constitution.

Try again.
Marisa

Chambersburg, PA

#698 Apr 13, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I was going to apologize for getting it wrong, but I see now that you are just lying.
Let me guess, you're going to claim that "someone else was using the same log in as me".
If you don't want to be held responsible for arguments posted under this name and location, then you need to register the name and location so other people can't use it.
You never had any intention of apologizing, otherwise you would have when you realized you accused the wrong person HOURS ago(post # 670).

You are just upset I caught you being impulsive and irresponsible. I caught you "jumping the gun", befoe you had the facts. So knock off the lie that you were going to apologize. You had that opportunity this morning and you didn't say a peep about being sorry for accusing me of something I did not do!

Again you are making no sense with this comment..."Let me guess, you're going to claim that someone else was using the same log as me".... No I never said that. And if that's your excuse for accusing me...well then pull up the other Marisa's /or whoever supposedly said what you accused me of.

I'll make it even easier on you..pull up the post where that remark of two blacks intimidating white voters. Who said it? Wasn't me so who was it? You say it happened and I'd like to see it. Think you can walk the walk or are you just talk?
Marisa

Chambersburg, PA

#699 Apr 13, 2013
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>You never had any intention of apologizing, otherwise you would have when you realized you accused the wrong person HOURS ago(post # 670).
You are just upset I caught you being impulsive and irresponsible. I caught you "jumping the gun", befoe you had the facts. So knock off the lie that you were going to apologize. You had that opportunity this morning and you didn't say a peep about being sorry for accusing me of something I did not do!
Again you are making no sense with this comment..."Let me guess, you're going to claim that someone else was using the same log as me".... No I never said that. And if that's your excuse for accusing me...well then pull up the other Marisa's /or whoever supposedly said what you accused me of.
I'll make it even easier on you..pull up the post where that remark of two blacks intimidating white voters. Who said it? Wasn't me so who was it? You say it happened and I'd like to see it. Think you can walk the walk or are you just talk?
Post # 678, not 670

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#700 Apr 13, 2013
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>You never had any intention of apologizing, otherwise you would have when you realized you accused the wrong person HOURS ago(post # 670).
You are just upset I caught you being impulsive and irresponsible. I caught you "jumping the gun", befoe you had the facts. So knock off the lie that you were going to apologize. You had that opportunity this morning and you didn't say a peep about being sorry for accusing me of something I did not do!
Again you are making no sense with this comment..."Let me guess, you're going to claim that someone else was using the same log as me".... No I never said that. And if that's your excuse for accusing me...well then pull up the other Marisa's /or whoever supposedly said what you accused me of.
I'll make it even easier on you..pull up the post where that remark of two blacks intimidating white voters. Who said it? Wasn't me so who was it? You say it happened and I'd like to see it. Think you can walk the walk or are you just talk?
Because you are using an unregistered account, it is impossible to search your old posts AND you can always just claim that someone is posing as you.

If you HONESTLY want to have a discussion about you being accountable for your arguments, then register.

Otherwise, we all have to assume you're a sock puppet.
Jefferson Davis

Greencastle, PA

#702 Apr 13, 2013
DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
We are NOT bound to obey UNCONSTITUTIONAL dictates. And can fight them off, by BLOOD, if necessary. And DESTROY the usurpers that are tyrannically stealing our rights away.
So you're advocating armed insurrection against the government?
Marisa

Chambersburg, PA

#703 Apr 14, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you are using an unregistered account, it is impossible to search your old posts AND you can always just claim that someone is posing as you.
If you HONESTLY want to have a discussion about you being accountable for your arguments, then register.
Otherwise, we all have to assume you're a sock puppet.
Excuses, excuses. You got caught with your pants down, thatt's what happened!

I said I would make it easy on you....just bring the post up. You can't even do that. You keep saying that I willsay someone else is posting as me......BRING THAT POST UP. I want to see it. I want to see who said that two blacks are intimidating white voters. Can you do that much? No I didn't think so. You just accuse people without evidence Then when you are confronted for proof you come with the stupid notion that it was under another unregistered name....so lets see that other name then.

Is this how you operate? You accuse posters of whatever you want without a shred of evidrnce? Certainly looks that way.

Like I said.....if you are going to accuse someone of something have the evidence FIRST then question that poster. Don't do it backwards the way you did. Everyone then sees you for what you are....dishonest, impulsive, irresponsible, childish, and last but not least a person that won't own up to their mistake.

You want to be taken serious here and have an honest debate? Then I suggest you grow up and act like an adult, and part of that requires taking responsibility for your mistakes. Otherwise you can continue on as you are, a dishonest, immature poster.
Right Rights

Carlisle, PA

#704 Apr 14, 2013
Bloodthirsty maggots...

==========

Florida police sergeant fired for having Trayvon Martin shooting targets

A Florida police sergeant was fired for possessing several so-called Trayvon Martin shooting targets, authorities said Saturday.

Sgt. Ron King of Port Canaveral Police Department was fired Friday after an internal review investigated how he offered the hoodie paper shooting targets to two fellow officers, said John Walsh, interim CEO of the Canaveral Port Authority.

The officers, who saw King with the targets in his police vehicle, declined the offer, Walsh said.

"Port Canaveral Police Department considers that behavior unacceptable," Walsh said of King's conduct.

King couldn't be immediately reached for comment.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/13/us/florida-tray...

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#705 Apr 14, 2013
DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
All of which of course is totally IRRELEVANT in the face of:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".
Our governments were EXPRESSLY CONSTITUTIONALLY FORBIDDEN from enacting ANY 'law' to the contrary. Despite what the treasonous u.s.s.c.'opines'.
The u.s.s.c. is NOT the "ULTIMATE AUTHORITY" - We The People and our Constitution ARE.
We are NOT bound to obey UNCONSTITUTIONAL dictates. And can fight them off, by BLOOD, if necessary. And DESTROY the usurpers that are tyrannically stealing our rights away.
Now go "lick the hands which feed you", you sycophant; votary of tyranny and usurpation.
Once again, your quote is NOT what it says in the 2nd Amendment therefore your entire argument is moot.

Quote the amendment in its ENTIRETY.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#706 Apr 14, 2013
Marisa wrote:
e Then when you are confronted for proof you come with the stupid notion that it was under another unregistered name....so lets see that other name then..
Wow, you're dumb.

The post I am responding to RIGHT NOW is an unregistered post.

EVERYTHING you post is an unregistered post.

Anyone can use the name "Marisa" because it is unregistered. That is why your posts are in white.

If you want to protect your name and own your posts, then register. Otherwise, we have as assume that ANYONE who posts as Marisa is you.
Marisa

Chambersburg, PA

#707 Apr 14, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you're dumb.
The post I am responding to RIGHT NOW is an unregistered post.
EVERYTHING you post is an unregistered post.
Anyone can use the name "Marisa" because it is unregistered. That is why your posts are in white.
If you want to protect your name and own your posts, then register. Otherwise, we have as assume that ANYONE who posts as Marisa is you.
No kidding! Keep on spinning! You can't even present any post that made the two black guys comment. Why? Because it doesn't exist! You just spouted your mouth off and accused me of something I did not say. I call you on it and you start babbling about I am not a registered poster. Duh! Then show the post, any post that makes that comment. Why won't you do that? Because you were caught lying, that's why.

Many posters get annoyed with Dan the man. But you know what? Dan is man enough to admit he made a mistake. He will apologize if he called someone on something and later realized he was wrong. And they don't have to be registered. Why can't you do that? Like I said, others have read your post and mine. You don't look very mature or credible right now. Your reputation will be that of someone that is dishonest and irresponsible.....actually it already is......
Right Rights

Carlisle, PA

#708 Apr 14, 2013
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>No kidding! Keep on spinning! You can't even present any post that made the two black guys comment. Why? Because it doesn't exist! You just spouted your mouth off and accused me of something I did not say. I call you on it and you start babbling about I am not a registered poster. Duh! Then show the post, any post that makes that comment. Why won't you do that? Because you were caught lying, that's why.
Many posters get annoyed with Dan the man. But you know what? Dan is man enough to admit he made a mistake. He will apologize if he called someone on something and later realized he was wrong. And they don't have to be registered. Why can't you do that? Like I said, others have read your post and mine. You don't look very mature or credible right now. Your reputation will be that of someone that is dishonest and irresponsible.....actually it already is......
...Midol, hun.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#709 Apr 14, 2013
Right Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
...Midol, hun.
seriously
Marisa

Shippensburg, PA

#711 Apr 14, 2013
Right Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
...Midol, hun.
If only it were that simple. Trust me, if Midol would help I would use it. I've tried Depakote, Tegretol, Topamax, Neurontin, Clozaril, Zyprexa, Abilify, Seroquel, and Invega. Nothing has helped. Some make me sleepy, but none of them even touch my symptoms.

Of course I know you aren't realy concerned about my health. Your just making fun. That's what you libs always do, make fun of the handicapped. Conservatives are the only ones who realy care about the handicapped. That's just another way that conservatives are superior to you sick libs.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#712 Apr 14, 2013
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>
If only it were that simple. Trust me, if Midol would help I would use it. I've tried Depakote, Tegretol, Topamax, Neurontin, Clozaril, Zyprexa, Abilify, Seroquel, and Invega. Nothing has helped. Some make me sleepy, but none of them even touch my symptoms.
Of course I know you aren't realy concerned about my health. Your just making fun. That's what you libs always do, make fun of the handicapped. Conservatives are the only ones who realy care about the handicapped. That's just another way that conservatives are superior to you sick libs.
Do you know if acupuncture has ever been tried ?
Marisa

Shippensburg, PA

#713 Apr 14, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Do you know if acupuncture has ever been tried ?
Is that the round pink one or the little square blue one?
Marisa

Shippensburg, PA

#714 Apr 14, 2013
Because I get them confused sometimes. lol!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
How To Handle A Firearm With Your Opposite Hand 4 hr SummerBB8 1
News Aren't American lives worth saving? 7 hr Margaret Sanger hero 28
New Tactical Gear at LAX Ammo OC Store! Mon SummerBB8 1
News Why are there always shootings in the US? Sun youll shoot your ... 1
News Rep. Steve Russell Seeking Solutions To Prevent... Sun Thomas 4
News The news media love America. The government, no... Oct 11 USWarRaceMakeWorl... 144
Best AR-15 How to Choose the Best AR-Style Ri... (Sep '15) Oct 6 FormerParatrooper 21
More from around the web