Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10983 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Bella Donna

UK

#5655 Aug 19, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Right.
Laws don't reduce crime.
They serve no purpose at all.
And serious people advocate for the elimination of all laws.
Blah.
Blah.
Blah.
Grow the hell up, nitwit.
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?

Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5656 Aug 19, 2013
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
You want truth, do you?
Well, WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?
We already had this argument, moron. Back in May, remember?
Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
Be serious?
Okay, I'll be serious: WHEN was the last time that any man-made law ever stopped anything from happening?
Run along, troll. I already decimated this dipshit argument and there's no reason to do it again.

LOL!
Bella Donna

London, UK

#5657 Aug 19, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
We already had this argument, moron. Back in May, remember?
<quoted text>
Run along, troll. I already decimated this dipshit argument and there's no reason to do it again.
LOL!
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?

Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5658 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Right.
Laws don't reduce crime.
They serve no purpose at all.
And serious people advocate for the elimination of all laws.
Blah.
Blah.
Blah.
Grow the hell up, nitwit.
Serious people advocate for laws that clamp down on the lawless while having no effect on the honest law abiding citizen. Grow the hell up, nitwit.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5659 Aug 20, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>
Serious people advocate for laws that clamp down on the lawless while having no effect on the honest law abiding citizen. Grow the hell up, nitwit.
Like background checks. They do not prohibit law-abiding citizens from buying guns, but they do succeed at making it much harder for a criminal to get a firearm.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5660 Aug 20, 2013
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
You want truth, do you?
Well, WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?
There's a retarded echo in here.

LOL!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5662 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Like background checks. They do not prohibit law-abiding citizens from buying guns, but they do succeed at making it much harder for a criminal to get a firearm.
But they DO have an effect on the law abiding citizen. That law abiding citizen is REQUIRED to submit to something in order to exercise a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. That law abiding citizen should be REQUIRED to do nothing more than what he has already done.....abided by the law. Requiring the law abiding to submit to anything in order to be able to enjoy the rights guaranteed by the constitution is an effect.....an undesirable and probably unconstitutional effect. Background checks are nothing more than a custom built opportunity for government to abuse its power. Do you REALLY think criminals obtain their weapons from a source that requires background checks??? If so, you are even more naive and blind to reality than I first suspected.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5663 Aug 20, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>But they DO have an effect on the law abiding citizen. That law abiding citizen is REQUIRED to submit to something in order to exercise a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. That law abiding citizen should be REQUIRED to do nothing more than what he has already done.....abided by the law. Requiring the law abiding to submit to anything in order to be able to enjoy the rights guaranteed by the constitution is an effect.....an undesirable and probably unconstitutional effect. Background checks are nothing more than a custom built opportunity for government to abuse its power. Do you REALLY think criminals obtain their weapons from a source that requires background checks??? If so, you are even more naive and blind to reality than I first suspected.
As long as you believe that everyone is entitled to own any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation whatsoever, it's impossible to hold a rational conversation with you.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5664 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as you believe that everyone is entitled to own any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation whatsoever, it's impossible to hold a rational conversation with you.
Why do you insist on putting words in the mouths of others? Not only is it rude it makes you look like a knee-jerk reactionary fool. I said no such thing and you know it. What I said was that laws enacted to control the lawless should have no effect on the law abiding. Obviously a concept that is totally alien to you. Also one can't help but notice that you have completely ignored my question about where criminals obtain their weapons and how background checks will have any effect at all on the black market. The only people who will be inconvenienced or denied are the LAW ABIDING CITIZENS who submit to a background check while the criminals continue obtaining their guns illegally, business as usual. Criminals don't obtain their weapons through legal means where background checks are required......why would they? They never have in the past.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5665 Aug 20, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you insist on putting words in the mouths of others? Not only is it rude it makes you look like a knee-jerk reactionary fool. I said no such thing and you know it.
You've said as much. Your posts indicate that's what you believe.

So why don't you just clear it up right now? Do you support everyone owning any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation?

Bet you'll dodge it.

LMAO!
Aphelion

Palm Bay, FL

#5666 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You've said as much. Your posts indicate that's what you believe.
So why don't you just clear it up right now? Do you support everyone owning any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation?
Bet you'll dodge it.
LMAO!
Like you dodged their questions. Hypocrite!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5669 Aug 20, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Like you dodged their questions. Hypocrite!
Find those lies I told yet?

No?

I didn't think so.

LMAO!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5670 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You've said as much. Your posts indicate that's what you believe.
So why don't you just clear it up right now? Do you support everyone owning any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation?
Bet you'll dodge it.
LMAO!
If you had paid attention, I've told you and others on this thread numerous times. The 2nd amendment covers all weapons up to and including the individual fire arms carried by the foot soldier. Plain and simple. I have NEVER said or implied anything else no matter what your erroneous mind reading tells you. It has also been ruled By the SCOTUS to be an INDIVIDUAL right, another indicator that it covers INDIVIDUAL arms. No one is talking about rocket launchers and atomic bombs as you hysterical gun grabbers would like the uninformed to believe. According to the wording of the constitution, the purpose of NOT INFRINGING on the right of the people to keep and bear arms it so there will always be an organized militia and a large unorganized militia. Should those militia ever be called to arms the folks who answer will be expected to fill the role of an individual foot soldier. It's all pretty clear to me. Not my fault you live in constant confusion.

And guess what, you've dodged my question once again. I guess I can conclude that you have no intelligent answer and chalk it up as another of your many defeats.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#5671 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Typing words is a behavior. Making statements is a behavior. Making assertions about the world is a behavior. Making claims about what is true is a behavior.
And Squach [sic] has made plenty of delusional statements, assertions, and claims.
How do you not comprehend this? Are you really this ignorant?
BTW - I await your apology for accusing me of lying when it was YOU who was confused.
LOL!...at you.
"Typing words is a behavior. Making statements is a behavior. Making assertions about the world is a behavior. Making claims about what is true is a behavior."

All typed words on a computer monitor...which really has nothing to do with ones "behavior". The words expressed here could only be used as an aid in determining behavior but only if you are personally interviewing the individual. Without actual contact with the individual, YOU have no idea and no way possible to make a "behavioral" determination.

"BTW - I await your apology for accusing me of lying when it was YOU who was confused."

Hole your breath, you seem confused. I never said you lied regarding "he". The lies you made were shown from your own posts...but then if YOU don't realize it, then it isn't a lie...according to you.

So how narrow is that opening between your blinders...?

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#5672 Aug 20, 2013
Take that gibberish to the next tea bag rally, they will love your level of ignorance

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5673 Aug 20, 2013
bobby6464 wrote:
Take that gibberish to the next tea bag rally, they will love your level of ignorance
Don't worry about the ignorance level of others. Your title of the most ignorant fool on the thread is only challenged by the other voices in your head. Does Danny Boy know you're out of your cage again?

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#5674 Aug 20, 2013
Squach the racial hating tea bag squach box. Your a dumb ass. Go prey for birthers

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5675 Aug 20, 2013
bobby6464 wrote:
Squach the racial hating tea bag squach box. Your a dumb ass. Go prey for birthers
The intellectual profundity of your comment is mind boggling. ROTFLMO!!!!!!! If it took intelligence to breath.......you'd suffocate. How does it feel to be a waste of skin?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5676 Aug 20, 2013
Oh good heavens! I left an "E" off!!!

I meant to type <breathe> OOOPS!

Now bubbleheaded bobby will have a typo to harp on for a few posts. Gotta toss even the dummest dog a bone every once in a while. LMAO!!

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#5677 Aug 20, 2013
Back at ya dumb ass. Be a good ignorant racial hater and guzzle that Limbaugh nut juice, don't sip that B.S. your above the sippy sippy cup. Your ignorance is promoted

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The NRA And The Worst Ad You May Ever See 46 min Big Al 179
News Country singer Scotty McCreery cited for Tue Been There Done That 4
News DC Circuit Tosses DC's Concealed Carry Ban Tue Mr Manfredgensenden 1
News Should they teach this in schools? Tue okimar 1
News Dove Hunting: Think Wires, Water, Treeline Breaks Tue okimar 1
News Black Women Picking Up Firearms For Self-Defense Tue okimar 1
News Black women picking up firearms for self-defense Tue Laredo 1
More from around the web