LMAO! I never said ANY of those things.<quoted text>
So, let me get this straight.
You claim that armed guards can protect those kids. OK. I agree.
However, you then claim that the armed guard must be limited in how many rounds he can have in his weapon. You claim that the best time to stop a shooter is to wait until he has emptied his weapon and needs to reload. You also say that making sure (although you have no idea of how to make sure) the shooter has a small capacity magazine, will enable the armed guard to stop the shooter sooner rather than later. You additionally say that it is OK to assume that a mass shooting will always be only one shooter. You then go on to claim that this is all reasonable.
Nothing like those strawman arguments you love so much. You can always defeat them.
Too bad you can't argue with what I ACTUALLY say. LOL!