Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#4495 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not a guilt trip. It's a REASON to do something.
But you place a higher priority on every person owning any weapon they want with zero restrictions over the lives of children. That says something significant about the quality of your character.
BULLSHIT!

I place a higher priority on people being able to protect their kids from mass murderers with an effective weapon instead of a dumbass Gun-Free Zone sign. Restricting the law-abidiong from exercising their right to protect themselves with an effective weapon is what led to the slaughter of those kids at Sandy Hook. GUN FREE ZONES GET PEOPLE KILLED!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4496 Jun 18, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
BULLSHIT!
I place a higher priority on people being able to protect their kids from mass murderers with an effective weapon instead of a dumbass Gun-Free Zone sign. Restricting the law-abidiong from exercising their right to protect themselves with an effective weapon is what led to the slaughter of those kids at Sandy Hook. GUN FREE ZONES GET PEOPLE KILLED!
If you cared about kids being shot, you'd offer some solutions to the problem instead of accusing those of us who do of using "guilt trips."
Gosnell joked

Copenhagen, Denmark

#4498 Jun 18, 2013
.
.
.

If you cared about kids being shot, you'd offer some solutions to the problem instead of accusing those of us who do of using "guilt trips."

.
.
.
.

Gosnell snipped the neck of one born at 30 weeks,

he joked that it was big enough to

.
.

"walk to the bus stop."

.
.
.
.

..........

big enough to

"walk to the bus stop."

"get it"

LOL,

ROTFLMAO

..........

big enough to "walk to the bus stop."

LOL, ROTFL, LMAO,LOL, ROTFL, LMAO,LOL, ROTFL, LMAO,LOL, ROTFL, LMAO,LOL, ROTFL, LMAO,

LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LO L,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL, LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,

Yeah baby!

..........

.
.

If you cared about kids being murdered, you'd offer some solutions to the problem instead of accusing those of us who do of using "guilt trips."

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4499 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course I didn't go to the rally. Why would I?
I see.
So you do not have the courage of your claimed convictions.

We already knew that.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4500 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
No, when the thread started I addressed the specific subject of the thread - a demonstration in support of nullification of federal law.
Many reasonable restrictions have been proposed. Limits on magazine capacities is reasonable. Universal background checks is reasonable.
But the issue is that gunners believe there should be NO restrictions whatsoever and that existing restrictions are unconstitutional. Are you in that camp?
Describe just HOW limiting the capacity of your fellow citizens to defend themselves is "reasonable".

Explain WHAT the purpose of background checks is.

No. I am not in camp. I wish I was tho. Oh well, September will be here soon enough.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4501 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh oh - there's that strawman again. LOL!
Where have I ever suggested that there should be limits on the number of guns anyone can own?
On page 13?

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4502 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
How many cars can I own Dan?
How about homes? How many homes can I own Dan?
Hey, I like antique hand tools. How many antique hand tools can I own Dan?
What would be "reasonable", according to yourself, in the maximum number of each of the above items I can own?
Dan?
How many is reasonable to you?
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh oh - there's that strawman again. LOL!
Where have I ever suggested that there should be limits on the number of guns anyone can own?
Just so you know Dan.^That^ too was NOT an argument, straight up or strawman. It was merely questions posed to you so that I could clarify just how far your need to limit what I possess, extends.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4503 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh oh - there's that strawman again. LOL!
Where have I ever suggested that there should be limits on the number of guns anyone can own?
You have REPEATEDLY stated that you intend to limit how much ammo one can possess. That limit, placed by you, also limits the weapon.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4504 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not a guilt trip. It's a REASON to do something.
But you place a higher priority on every person owning any weapon they want with zero restrictions over the lives of children. That says something significant about the quality of your character.
"with zero restrictions over the lives of children."
WTF?^That^ "says something significant about the quality of your character."

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4505 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
I see.
So you do not have the courage of your claimed convictions.
We already knew that.
LOL! It's actually consistent with my conviction not to knowingly place myself in dangerous situations.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4506 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Describe just HOW limiting the capacity of your fellow citizens to defend themselves is "reasonable".
Explain WHAT the purpose of background checks is.
No. I am not in camp. I wish I was tho. Oh well, September will be here soon enough.
LOL! ANOTHER strawman?

I have never advocated anything that would limit anyone's capacity for self-defense.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4507 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
On page 13?
Nope.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4508 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
If you cared about kids being shot, you'd offer some solutions to the problem instead of accusing those of us who do of using "guilt trips."
We HAVE offered solutions. You do not like them because you are a wuss. You lack the courage of your convictions, and the intestinal fortitude to defend those kids with some "eye for an eye" treatment. You talk through your hat Washichu.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4509 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
How many cars can I own Dan?
How about homes? How many homes can I own Dan?
Hey, I like antique hand tools. How many antique hand tools can I own Dan?
What would be "reasonable", according to yourself, in the maximum number of each of the above items I can own?
Dan?
How many is reasonable to you?
<quoted text>
Just so you know Dan.^That^ too was NOT an argument, straight up or strawman. It was merely questions posed to you so that I could clarify just how far your need to limit what I possess, extends.
Let me explain - the assumption that I want to limit what you can possess IS your strawman argument.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4510 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
You have REPEATEDLY stated that you intend to limit how much ammo one can possess. That limit, placed by you, also limits the weapon.
Sorry, I haven't.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4511 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
"with zero restrictions over the lives of children."
WTF?^That^ "says something significant about the quality of your character."
LOL! Obviously you misunderstood the statement.

Or you intentionally distorted it.

Either way - you're wrong.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4512 Jun 18, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! It's actually consistent with my conviction not to knowingly place myself in dangerous situations.
We know it is consistant with your lack of testicles to avoid places where you can not hold your own.
That is exactly why you insist on placing those innocent kids in dangerous situations rather than yourself, or another adult with some guts to actually defend those kids when they need it. They need defending BEFORE the cops show up.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4513 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
We HAVE offered solutions. You do not like them because you are a wuss. You lack the courage of your convictions, and the intestinal fortitude to defend those kids with some "eye for an eye" treatment. You talk through your hat Washichu.
Keep fighting with those strawmen!

Maybe one day you'll defeat them and then will have the courage to argue with what I've ACTUALLY said.

LMAO!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4514 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
We know it is consistant with your lack of testicles to avoid places where you can not hold your own.
That is exactly why you insist on placing those innocent kids in dangerous situations rather than yourself, or another adult with some guts to actually defend those kids when they need it. They need defending BEFORE the cops show up.
Guess what? I'm on record here supporting armed guards in schools.

Next strawman argument.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#4515 Jun 18, 2013
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
We know it is consistant with your lack of testicles to avoid places where you can not hold your own.
LOL! Where I can't hold my own.

You're funny.

Statistically the courthouse square was the most dangerous spot in Franklin County on that day. Sensible people stayed away.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Congressman plans to introduce national conceal... 41 min GloriusGoodness 48
News Trump nominee will politicize Dept. of Justice 13 hr Dolly6807 2
News DNC Chair Frontrunner Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Min... 14 hr Trump your President 58
News Big Law Firms Target Your Second Amendment Rights 15 hr Say What 1
News 'Miss Sloane': Bad behavior on Capitol Hill 22 hr Frogface Kate 1
News Mapping Reform: Where are Things Likely to Change? Thu Scout1 1
News Hudson Proposes National Concealed Carry Bill Dec 6 duzitreallymatter 3
More from around the web