Conn. senators to discuss gun control plans

Apr 26, 2013 Full story: WDBO-AM Orlando 10

Connecticut's two U.S. senators are expected to discuss plans to push for gun control legislation following its recent Senate defeat.

Full Story

Since: Jan 09

Brooklyn, NY

#1 Apr 26, 2013
So they want to bring to the rest of the country the "wonderful" laws that New York, Connecticut, California, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Maryland have on the books. No thank you! It is bad enough living in New York. At least I have the prospect of moving away from this state in four years to a free state.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#2 Apr 26, 2013
Connecticut Senators :

First Senator : I am for gun control!

Second Senator : Here , Here !!

First Senator : OK it is time to leave , where is my armed security detail to see me back to Connecticut ?

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#3 Apr 26, 2013
What part of: "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed". Do these treasonous SERVANTS not understand?
Bruce VB

Killingworth, CT

#4 Apr 26, 2013
There is no common sense involved in Ct gun laws that were passed. They would not have had any useful impact on the Sandy Hook shootings. As for our Senators, one has integrity issues and our other Senator parrots the guy with integrity problems! Both are Michael Bloomberg puppets who openly lie about supporting the Second Amendment. Total civilian disarmament is their obsession and they cannot succeed if there are still free states. Hence the attacks on the non-socialist legislators in other states.
Bruce VB

Killingworth, CT

#5 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
What part of: "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed". Do these treasonous SERVANTS not understand?
. Unfortunately, those of us who work and support the Constitution are out numbered by the masses who live off of our tax dollars through entitlement programs. It will be interesting when the money runs out! Think they will riot, rape and pillage or try to become part of the solution? Just a thought!!

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#6 Apr 26, 2013
Bruce VB wrote:
<quoted text>. Unfortunately, those of us who work and support the Constitution are out numbered by the masses who live off of our tax dollars through entitlement programs. It will be interesting when the money runs out! Think they will riot, rape and pillage or try to become part of the solution? Just a thought!!
I'll let Mr. Samuel Adams answer that one:

"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."--Samuel Adams

And as far as those that would "riot, rape and pillage" are concerned. That's why it's wise to have faith, and a good supply of ammunition on hand.... ;)
Bruce VB

Danielson, CT

#7 Apr 27, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll let Mr. Samuel Adams answer that one:
"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."--Samuel Adams
And as far as those that would "riot, rape and pillage" are concerned. That's why it's wise to have faith, and a good supply of ammunition on hand.... ;)
. The Founding Fathers always inspire with timeless wisdom. To read renews faith. And I am in good shape with ammunition. Thanks for this piece of history.:)

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#8 Apr 27, 2013
Bruce VB wrote:
<quoted text>. The Founding Fathers always inspire with timeless wisdom. To read renews faith. And I am in good shape with ammunition. Thanks for this piece of history.:)
You are most welcome, my fellow American Patriot. Here's some more for your ammo. box:

"The constitutional right to bear arms is intended to guaranty to the people, in support of just government, such right, and to afford the citizen means for defense of self and property. While this secures to him a right of which he cannot be deprived, it enjoins a duty in execution of which that right is to be exercised. If he employs those arms which he ought to wield for the safety and protection of his country, his person, and his property, to the annoyance and terror and danger of its citizens, his acts find no vindication in the bill of rights. That guaranty was never intended as a warrant for vicious persons to carry weapons with which to terrorize others. Going armed with unusual and dangerous weapons, to the terror of the people, is an offense at common law. A man may carry a gun for any lawful purpose, for business or amusement, but he cannot go about with that or any other dangerous weapon to terrify and alarm a peaceful people."--Chief Justice William T. Spear, Supreme Court of Ohio, State v. Hogan, 63 Ohio 202, 58 N.E. 572, 52 L.R.A. 863, 81 Am. St. 626 (1900).
Bruce VB

Danielson, CT

#9 Apr 27, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are most welcome, my fellow American Patriot. Here's some more for your ammo. box:
"The constitutional right to bear arms is intended to guaranty to the people, in support of just government, such right, and to afford the citizen means for defense of self and property. While this secures to him a right of which he cannot be deprived, it enjoins a duty in execution of which that right is to be exercised. If he employs those arms which he ought to wield for the safety and protection of his country, his person, and his property, to the annoyance and terror and danger of its citizens, his acts find no vindication in the bill of rights. That guaranty was never intended as a warrant for vicious persons to carry weapons with which to terrorize others. Going armed with unusual and dangerous weapons, to the terror of the people, is an offense at common law. A man may carry a gun for any lawful purpose, for business or amusement, but he cannot go about with that or any other dangerous weapon to terrify and alarm a peaceful people."--Chief Justice William T. Spear, Supreme Court of Ohio, State v. Hogan, 63 Ohio 202, 58 N.E. 572, 52 L.R.A. 863, 81 Am. St. 626 (1900).
. I thank you again for another intriguing bit of American history.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#10 Apr 27, 2013
Bruce VB wrote:
<quoted text>. I thank you again for another intriguing bit of American history.
And you are once again most welcome. A LOT more can be found here:
http://gunshowonthenet.blogspot.com/

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Opinion Line 12 min woodtick57 86
Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) 19 min Julia 10,876
Moms Demand Action Calls On Kroger Family Of St... Thu Squach 10
Fact or Fiction: Push-Feed Rifles Won't Cycle R... Sep 16 Tory II 1
3 year old shoots AR and survives Sep 15 Tory II 4
30-06 (7.62X63) vs .308 (7.62X51) (Feb '11) Sep 15 Tory II 96
Chicago Liberals Outlaw the Firearm Industry Sep 15 Tory II 1
•••

Guns People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••