Police. Chief Suspended Over Videos | VIDEOS

There are 3 comments on the The Family Badge story from Aug 1, 2013, titled Police. Chief Suspended Over Videos | VIDEOS. In it, The Family Badge reports that:

The 7 p.m. meeting was preceded by a 55-minute executive session to discuss what action would be taken, if any, against Kessler.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Family Badge.

John Pul

Lady Lake, FL

#1 Aug 1, 2013
This person you call a police chief he should be fired, any one that showes that much anger,should not have a gun, or even be a cop. why is it that the midair glorifies this type of stupidity.

By the way the 2 amendment is in 2 parts, gun owner exclude the first part, The 2 amendment was incorporate in to the 14 amendment,so you do not have the right to own arms.

Define, arms- something that can be used in anger, against another. In 1776 it was fintlock and musket, so what part in the 2 amendment stats AK 47 OR GLOCKS. It also states as militants to secure a free state, from 1669 to the civial war all white males 16 to 60 were required to join a civilian militant group, if you did not, you could not have a firearm it was called the white mans law.
FormerParatroope r

North Charleston, SC

#2 Aug 1, 2013
John Pul wrote:
This person you call a police chief he should be fired, any one that showes that much anger,should not have a gun, or even be a cop. why is it that the midair glorifies this type of stupidity.
By the way the 2 amendment is in 2 parts, gun owner exclude the first part, The 2 amendment was incorporate in to the 14 amendment,so you do not have the right to own arms.
Define, arms- something that can be used in anger, against another. In 1776 it was fintlock and musket, so what part in the 2 amendment stats AK 47 OR GLOCKS. It also states as militants to secure a free state, from 1669 to the civial war all white males 16 to 60 were required to join a civilian militant group, if you did not, you could not have a firearm it was called the white mans law.
SCOTUS has affirmed that there is a right to bear arms.

The argument that AKs, Glocks, percussion rifles, etc did not exist at the time makes as much sense to think the First Amendment Rights are only subject to the technology of the time. That is a nonsense, often repeated argument of misinformed people.

The first gun laws barred non whites from being armed, and the Militia Act was a response to the political situation of the time. The Militia Act did not bar firearm ownership by non militia. It in fact offered firearms to those who could not afford one.

Gun control began as a racist policy on this continent. Later the King ordered gun confiscation in Boston to quell the rebellion. Following laws up to the early 1900's were aimed at minorities. The 1900's began a new era of gun control that still focused on minorities but also poor people of all races. Fee's, local permits were used to restrict the right to bear arms. Then there is the Gun Control Act of 1968, NRA endorsed, that made it Federal Law to restrict further the right. The authors admitted after the passing that the Act was meant to restrict minorities from bearing arms.

Did you know according to SCOTUS the police have no responsibility to secure you from a criminal? Or that the sawed off shotgun was banned because it did not have a military application and therefore not protected by the 2A, as ruled by the SCOTUS?

If you doubt these facts, Google them.

Gun control is nothing more than racism, classism and a phony idea that takes the focus away from failed political and economic policies in areas where firearm crime is prevails.
Toxicbeowulf

Atlanta, GA

#3 Aug 2, 2013
John Pul wrote:
This person you call a police chief he should be fired, any one that showes that much anger,should not have a gun, or even be a cop. why is it that the midair glorifies this type of stupidity.
By the way the 2 amendment is in 2 parts, gun owner exclude the first part, The 2 amendment was incorporate in to the 14 amendment,so you do not have the right to own arms.
Define, arms- something that can be used in anger, against another. In 1776 it was fintlock and musket, so what part in the 2 amendment stats AK 47 OR GLOCKS. It also states as militants to secure a free state, from 1669 to the civial war all white males 16 to 60 were required to join a civilian militant group, if you did not, you could not have a firearm it was called the white mans law.
John Pul you sir bring stupid to a whole new level! Please leave the gene pool.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News House passes concealed carry bill; Hassan plans... Apr 29 Truth and Facts 4
Democrats: Get A $2,000 Tax Credit For Turning ... Apr 29 Truth and Facts 19
News Sheriff, lawyer dispute whether 73-year-old dep... Apr 29 Truth and Facts 49
Kahr CW40 PROBLEM (Dec '08) Apr 17 OlFed 48
News Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) Apr 15 AMERICA 12,178
News Local Jews upset by Holocaust references in cam... (Jun '12) Apr 13 swedenforever 112
News Who's calling the shots in Canada? Apr 10 Truth and Facts 2
More from around the web