Back Door Gun Control Moves Forward

Back Door Gun Control Moves Forward

There are 117 comments on the Right Wing News story from Oct 29, 2013, titled Back Door Gun Control Moves Forward. In it, Right Wing News reports that:

There are numerous alarming reasons why the US government and the military have been buying up all the ammo.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Right Wing News.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#55 Nov 21, 2013
PrinceofDarkness wrote:
<quoted text>How about I just punch your lights out?
How about you come to Phoenix and give it a try?
PrinceofDarkness

Los Angeles, CA

#56 Nov 21, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
How about you come to Phoenix and give it a try?
Let's have an address, hero!!!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#57 Nov 21, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
How about you come to Phoenix and give it a try?
Will they let you out of your cell for this, GumsShow?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#59 Nov 21, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Addendum: It should be noted that around 70% of all homicides by firearm are gang related.
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

You just told us it was EIGHTY PERCENT!!!

HAHAHAHA!

You lying POOOOOOOOOOOOOOTAH!

PS: It isn't 70 either!!!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#60 Nov 21, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Why do you think the FBI lumped in "Hispanic" with "White" in their crime figures?.
Because most Hispanics are WHITE!

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!

PS: Your mother didn't mind! Why do you think you have a hankering for salsa, mu·cha·cha?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#61 Nov 21, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Will they let you out of your cell for this, GumsShow?
Time for another pathetic episode of Blunder-Troll already? Nah, it gets too boring. Change the channel.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#62 Nov 21, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!
You just told us it was EIGHTY PERCENT!!!
HAHAHAHA!
You lying POOOOOOOOOOOOOOTAH!
PS: It isn't 70 either!!!
Gee, I guess Blunder-Troll doesn't know how to read. This is pathetic. Change the channel again.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#63 Nov 21, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because most Hispanics are WHITE!
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
PS: Your mother didn't mind! Why do you think you have a hankering for salsa, mu·cha·cha?
I guess that last hit from the crack pipe fried your brain, eh?

His·pan·ic (h-spnk)
adj.
1. Of or relating to Spain or Spanish-speaking Latin America.
2. Of or relating to a Spanish-speaking people or culture.
n.
1. A Spanish-speaking person.
2. A U.S. citizen or resident of Latin-American or Spanish descent.
[Latin Hispnicus, from Hispnia, Spain.]
Usage Note: Though often used interchangeably in American English, Hispanic and Latino are not identical terms, and in certain contexts the choice between them can be significant. Hispanic, from the Latin word for "Spain," has the broader reference, potentially encompassing all Spanish-speaking peoples in both hemispheres and emphasizing the common denominator of language among communities that sometimes have little else in common. Latinowhich in Spanish means "Latin" but which as an English word is probably a shortening of the Spanish word latinoamericanorefers more exclusively to persons or communities of Latin American origin. Of the two, only Hispanic can be used in referring to Spain and its history and culture; a native of Spain residing in the United States is a Hispanic, not a Latino, and one cannot substitute Latino in the phrase the Hispanic influence on native Mexican cultures without garbling the meaning. In practice, however, this distinction is of little significance when referring to residents of the United States, most of whom are of Latin American origin and can theoretically be called by either word.· A more important distinction concerns the sociopolitical rift that has opened between Latino and Hispanic in American usage. For a certain segment of the Spanish-speaking population, Latino is a term of ethnic pride and Hispanic a label that borders on the offensive. According to this view, Hispanic lacks the authenticity and cultural resonance of Latino, with its Spanish sound and its ability to show the feminine form Latina when used of women. Furthermore, Hispanicthe term used by the U.S. Census Bureau and other government agenciesis said to bear the stamp of an Anglo establishment far removed from the concerns of the Spanish-speaking community. While these views are strongly held by some, they are by no means universal, and the division in usage seems as related to geography as it is to politics, with Latino widely preferred in California and Hispanic the more usual term in Florida and Texas. Even in these regions, however, usage is often mixed, and it is not uncommon to find both terms used by the same writer or speaker.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hispanic

Go ask your dad to stop spanking you so hard child.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#64 Nov 21, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess that last hit from the crack pipe fried your brain, eh?
His·pan·ic (h-spnk)
adj.
Apparently the pipe you have been sucking on fired of a wad that shut off your oxygen supply.

I know your KKK rallies don't cover terms such as "race" and "ethnicity", but in fairness to your KKK masters, I am sure even they realized what a dullard you are: someone who cannot even admit that 276 is a larger number than 253.

NO one is waiting for you to admit you have ever had anything wrong, Vince.

Goalposts, troll: Delaware was a slave state and is south of the Mason Dixon line.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#65 Nov 21, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently the pipe you have been sucking on fired of a wad that shut off your oxygen supply.
I know your KKK rallies don't cover terms such as "race" and "ethnicity", but in fairness to your KKK masters, I am sure even they realized what a dullard you are: someone who cannot even admit that 276 is a larger number than 253.
NO one is waiting for you to admit you have ever had anything wrong, Vince.
Goalposts, troll: Delaware was a slave state and is south of the Mason Dixon line.
Geographically, the approximate division between the north and south in the continental United States. Would be from just north of Richmond in Virginia on the east coast. To just south of the city of Monterey in California on the west coast. Which makes Delaware in the NORTHERN United States. And THAT is a PHYSICAL GEOLOGICAL FACT.

Of interest, is that this dividing line cuts about 1/4 off of Nevada and Utah,(placing the bulk of those states in the north). As well as 3/5 of Colorado, and about 1/3 of Kansas and Missouri. In addition to cutting through major parts of Illinois, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia and Virginia. Yet ALL of those states were included in the "south", with the exception of Illinois and Indiana. In other words, your pathetic ‘Delaware’ argument is pure BS.

As for the rest of your flailing and mindless spewings, they're just that.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#66 Nov 21, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Geographically, the approximate division between the north and south
I see: since you lost the argument of Delaware being a southern state, you are back to drawing a line across the US - and pretending that was what you meant to say in the first place.

Problem with that is, GayDavy, you aren't going to be able to pick a latitude that lines up with your states you've repeated 20 times in the last day.

You best bet now is to claim someone took over your account and posted as you.

This is called the ANal of Indy defense.

You may have to pay him a small fee, he could have put a patent on it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#67 Nov 21, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
And THAT is a PHYSICAL GEOLOGICAL FACT..
You are making things up.

I guess it is in your nature to lie when you blink.

Anyone can take a sharpie out and draw a line on a map and insist everything above the line is north and below it south.

Of course, then you are stuck with explaining with why the states you already listed- twenty times or so- different from the ones you have now.

Maybe it's something your boyfriend can mull over while you suckle his grapes tonight.

PS: Delaware was a slave state and I noticed you never got around to explaining the Mason Dixon line.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#68 Nov 22, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Which makes Delaware in the NORTHERN United States. And THAT is a PHYSICAL GEOLOGICAL FACT.
Delaware was a slave state.

NO matter how hard you stomp your feet.

And we have gotten around to the other dozen things you said in your post... we are still on #1.

Should be fun you explaining how Washington DC is a southern "state" when parts of Virginia are north of it, putting aside it's a city...

PS: If you want to draw a line that is halfway between the northern most part of the US and the southern most point, let me know.

I'd be happy to jam that PHYSICAL GEOLOGICAL FACT up your azz.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#69 Nov 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I see: since you lost the argument of Delaware being a southern state, you are back to drawing a line across the US - and pretending that was what you meant to say in the first place.
Problem with that is, GayDavy, you aren't going to be able to pick a latitude that lines up with your states you've repeated 20 times in the last day.
You best bet now is to claim someone took over your account and posted as you.
This is called the ANal of Indy defense.
You may have to pay him a small fee, he could have put a patent on it.
Not quite troll. For I've "lost" NOTHING. While on the contrary, >you< have lost EVERYTHING. For that is what you are, and what you do - LOSE.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#70 Nov 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Delaware was a slave state.
NO matter how hard you stomp your feet.
And we have gotten around to the other dozen things you said in your post... we are still on #1.
Should be fun you explaining how Washington DC is a southern "state" when parts of Virginia are north of it, putting aside it's a city...
PS: If you want to draw a line that is halfway between the northern most part of the US and the southern most point, let me know.
I'd be happy to jam that PHYSICAL GEOLOGICAL FACT up your azz.
And this addresses the rest of your ignorant drooling:

Northern States "Total murders" "Total firearms"
Alaska 29 11
Connecticut 146 112
Delaware 57 41
Idaho 26 17
Illinois3 509 439
Indiana 275 205
Iowa 44 25
Maine 25 14
Maryland 365 277
Massachusetts 121 70
Michigan 682 536
Minnesota 89 41
Montana 22 11
Nebraska 52 42
New Hampshire 14 9
New Jersey 385 273
New York 682 407
North Dakota 16 4
Ohio 410 278
Oregon 81 42
Pennsylvania 684 522
Rhode Island 34 19
South Dakota 14 4
Vermont 8 2
Washington, D.C. 108 77
Washington 194 106
Wisconsin 169 108
Wyoming 14 5

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#71 Nov 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are making things up.
I guess it is in your nature to lie when you blink.
Anyone can take a sharpie out and draw a line on a map and insist everything above the line is north and below it south.
Of course, then you are stuck with explaining with why the states you already listed- twenty times or so- different from the ones you have now.
Maybe it's something your boyfriend can mull over while you suckle his grapes tonight.
PS: Delaware was a slave state and I noticed you never got around to explaining the Mason Dixon line.
It is good when your own ignorance can be used against you. Appreciate the frequent opportunities:

Northern States:

Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, D.C., Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming. Total Population = 136,308,568

Southern States:

Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia. Total legal 2012 population = 177,362,338

The South has 41,053,770 more people than the North. Then there's THIS interesting FACT:

Illegal immigrants 16,000,000

At least 80% of those are in the southern U.S.- Mainly; Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, New Mexico and Texas.

Number of illegals: 12,800,000
Population Difference: 41,053,770
Total Population over: 53,853,770 (South over north)

The largest percentage of homicides [by far] are in California, Florida, and Texas.

Why do you think the FBI lumped in "Hispanic" with "White" in their crime figures?

Addendum: It should be noted that around 70% of all homicides by firearm are gang related.Which is verified here:

"Putting Gun Death Statistics In Perspective

"To hear gun control advocates speak, one would be led to believe that gun violence is a widespread problem whereby the mere existence of a gun is as much a problem as the person who intends to wield it. But the reality is that gun homicides are overwhelmingly tied to gang violence. In fact, a staggering 80% of gun homicides are gang-related. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), gang homicides accounted for roughly 8,900 of 11,100 gun murders in both 2010 and 2011. That means that there were just 2,200 non gang-related firearm murders in both years in a country of over 300 million people and 250 million guns."
http://usconservatives.about.com/od/capitalpu...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#72 Nov 22, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
And this addresses
1 Alaska: homicides per 100,000: 20
2 Louisiana: homicides per 100,000: 19.5
3 Wyoming: homicides per 100,000: 18.8
4 Arizona: homicides per 100,000: 18
5 Nevada: homicides per 100,000: 17.3
5 Mississippi: homicides per 100,000: 17.3
7 New Mexico: homicides per 100,000: 16.6
8 Arkansas: homicides per 100,000: 16.3
9 Alabama: homicides per 100,000: 16.2
10 Tennessee: homicides per 100,000: 15.4

++

Apples to Apples...
1. Tennessee: Violent crimes per 100,000: 643.6
2. Nevada: Violent crimes per 100,000: 607.6
3. Alaska: Violent crimes per 100,000: 603.2
4. New Mexico: Violent crimes per 100,000: 559.1
5. South Carolina:Violent crimes per 100,000: 558.8
6. Delaware: Violent crimes per 100,000: 547.4
7. Louisiana: Violent crimes per 100,000: 496.9
8. Florida: Violent crimes per 100,000: 487.1
9. Maryland: Violent crimes per 100,000: 476.8
10. Oklahoma: Violent crimes per 100,000: 469.3

Flagged for repeated spam

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#73 Nov 22, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Not quite troll. For I've "lost" NOTHING.
Since you put your word behind the bet and you welched on it, your word is worthless so I understand why you have lost nothing.

But I've slapped the snot out of you.

I can't make you admit anything, Shug.

But when you insist 276 is a larger number than 253, I can stuff it up your azz.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#75 Nov 22, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
And this addresses the rest of your ignorant drooling:
Northern States "Total murders" "Total firearms"
If only moron could understand why a state with 39 million people in it would have more murders (and more just about everything else) than a state that has 600,00- a population smaller than many of that state's cities.

Flagged for repeat cross posted spams.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#76 Nov 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
1 Alaska: homicides per 100,000: 20
2 Louisiana: homicides per 100,000: 19.5
3 Wyoming: homicides per 100,000: 18.8
4 Arizona: homicides per 100,000: 18
5 Nevada: homicides per 100,000: 17.3
5 Mississippi: homicides per 100,000: 17.3
7 New Mexico: homicides per 100,000: 16.6
8 Arkansas: homicides per 100,000: 16.3
9 Alabama: homicides per 100,000: 16.2
10 Tennessee: homicides per 100,000: 15.4
++
Apples to Apples...
1. Tennessee: Violent crimes per 100,000: 643.6
2. Nevada: Violent crimes per 100,000: 607.6
3. Alaska: Violent crimes per 100,000: 603.2
4. New Mexico: Violent crimes per 100,000: 559.1
5. South Carolina:Violent crimes per 100,000: 558.8
6. Delaware: Violent crimes per 100,000: 547.4
7. Louisiana: Violent crimes per 100,000: 496.9
8. Florida: Violent crimes per 100,000: 487.1
9. Maryland: Violent crimes per 100,000: 476.8
10. Oklahoma: Violent crimes per 100,000: 469.3
Flagged for repeated spam
"Flagged for repeated spam"

As well you should. For everything >you< post is spam.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Shooting at Lake Hefner Restaurant in OKC 2 hr Joseph DeDominicis 9
News Largest maker of bump stocks will stop acceptin... 2 hr whiney beech 588
News Lash Hansborough: Second Amendment no longer ap... 17 hr The Green Watchdog 9
News Trump's plan will seek to 'harden' schools agai... Sat Shelly Bl 1,562
News Committee rejects bill to arm teachers Thu Joseph DeDominicis 3
News Texas Moms Demand Action President Charged for ... Thu judy 16
News Saratoga proposes firearm safety ordinance May 19 WTF 2