Poll Claims Gun Control a Winning Pos...

Poll Claims Gun Control a Winning Position for VA's McAuliffe

There are 26 comments on the AmmoLand story from Nov 5, 2013, titled Poll Claims Gun Control a Winning Position for VA's McAuliffe. In it, AmmoLand reports that:

On the eve of Virginia's gubernatorial election, Politico released numbers from " Democratic firm Public Policy Polling " showing that gun control is a winning position for candidate Terry McAuliffe .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at AmmoLand.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1 Nov 5, 2013
Then that "poll" is deliberately slanted, if not an outright fabrication. To Wit:

Americans undergo stunning gun control shift, new poll finds
Monday, October 28, 2013

The call for stricter gun control has waned since the Newtown, Conn., school shooting at the end of 2012, a Gallup poll released Friday found.

In the days following the school shooting, which killed 20 children and six staff members, 58 percent of those polled wanted stricter gun control. Now, almost a year after the December shooting, that number has dropped to 49 percent.

SPECIAL COVERAGE: Second Amendment and Gun Control

The drop also means the country now is split nearly evenly on whether gun control laws need to be stricter. On the other side of the 49 percent who want stricter laws, 50 percent want laws to either be less strict or kept the same.

The poll also found that 74 percent of respondents are opposed to a law that would ban handguns, except for use by police and other law enforcement. Only about a quarter think the use of handguns should be limited only to authorized personnel.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/...

But hey, if they want to destroy the democrats chances to win, so be it. The treasonous party deserves to lose as much as possible.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4 Nov 5, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Then that "poll" is deliberately slanted, if not an outright fabrication. To Wit:
CLICK!

Ninety percent of Americans support universal background checks.

Eighty percent of American gun owners support universal background checks

Seventy four percent of NRA members support universal background check

Fifty Five percent of licensed gun dealers support universal background checks.

It seems the only people who don't are the mentally ill and the felons.

PS: Violent crime went UP in 2012.

Wipe your chin, dear.

Flagged for spam.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#5 Nov 5, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
CLICK!
Ninety percent of Americans support universal background checks.
Eighty percent of American gun owners support universal background checks
Seventy four percent of NRA members support universal background check
Fifty Five percent of licensed gun dealers support universal background checks.
It seems the only people who don't are the mentally ill and the felons.
PS: Violent crime went UP in 2012.
Wipe your chin, dear.
Flagged for spam.
You flagged your own post as spam? Wow, you're really growing up. Frankly, I'm amazed.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6 Nov 5, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Frankly, I'm amazed.
You get amazed by traffic lights, Sodomite.

Have you come up with an explanation of how someone who owns slaves can be opposed to slavery his whole life?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7 Nov 5, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You get amazed by traffic lights, Sodomite.
Have you come up with an explanation of how someone who owns slaves can be opposed to slavery his whole life?
Why don't you ask; Thomas Jefferson or George Washington? Or, for more recent examples, how about Bill Gates, or Steve Jobs?
2ndAmretard

Winter Park, FL

#9 Nov 5, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you ask; Thomas Jefferson or George Washington? Or, for more recent examples, how about Bill Gates, or Steve Jobs?
DEMOCRATS TOOK ANOTHER BEATING... BWHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA

NBC: McAuliffe wins Virginia governor race

EAT $-HIT 2ndAmrightard....
Tray

Saltillo, MS

#11 Nov 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
CLICK!
Ninety percent of Americans support universal background checks.
Eighty percent of American gun owners support universal background checks
Seventy four percent of NRA members support universal background check
Fifty Five percent of licensed gun dealers support universal background checks.
It seems the only people who don't are the mentally ill and the felons.
PS: Violent crime went UP in 2012.
Wipe your chin, dear.
Flagged for spam.
First you pick polls that from the left and proven tainted. Second, if the majority were to favor slavery would it be OK to remove the rights of blacks and return them to slaves based on the will of the majority?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#12 Nov 6, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you ask; Thomas Jefferson or George Washington?
They are dead, Sodomite.

You were the one who told us a slave owner opposed slavery.

'spain it to us, Lucy!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#13 Nov 6, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Or, for more recent examples, how about Bill Gates, or Steve Jobs?
Show us the link or any proof that either owned slaves, Sodomite.

I understand: you become so ridiculous that you have to change your alias.

AGAIN.

Shame your aliases get no smarter.

Eh, Sodomite.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#14 Nov 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
They are dead, Sodomite.
You were the one who told us a slave owner opposed slavery.
'spain it to us, Lucy!
Because he didn't want to turn his slaves loose to be preyed upon by his fellow [degenerate racist] demonrats. Just as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson had done.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#15 Nov 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us the link or any proof that either owned slaves, Sodomite.
I understand: you become so ridiculous that you have to change your alias.
AGAIN.
Shame your aliases get no smarter.
Eh, Sodomite.
They don't "own", they lease them from their communist chinese business partners.
Tray

Saltillo, MS

#16 Nov 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us the link or any proof that either owned slaves, Sodomite.
I understand: you become so ridiculous that you have to change your alias.
AGAIN.
Shame your aliases get no smarter.
Eh, Sodomite.
Still dodging my question?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#17 Nov 6, 2013
Tray wrote:
<quoted text>Still dodging my question?
Still dodging mine?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#18 Nov 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Still dodging mine?
How does one "dodge" thin air?
SatanRules

Ashburn, VA

#19 Nov 6, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
How does one "dodge" thin air?
http://imageshack.us/a/img852/720/fatchickpuk...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#20 Nov 11, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
"The passage in General Wade Hampton's speech at the Union square ratification meeting which the Times held up to reprobation, is the following:

"We can have no relief unless this great Democratic party will come out, and pledge itself that we shall have a fair election--that the white people of the South shall vote; and I want you all to register an oath that, when they do vote, that these votes shall be counted, and if there is a majority of white votes, that, you will place Seymour and Blair in the White House, in spite of all the bayonets that shall be brought against them. I only want to see the election fair, and if they do that, even with the incubus of black rule, we can carry the Southern States."

"We find nothing in this to disapprove. We should deprecate the necessity of a resort to force, but we pour scorn upon the craven, the pusillanimous notion that freemen may not vindicate their rights by arms. Courage to resist oppression is the ultimate security for good government. This, at least, was the opinion of our brave forefathers when they took care to provide in the Constitution that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The right to bear arms implies the right, on a sufficient provocation, to use them. The only debatable question relates to the sufficiency of the provocation.

"If the Democratic party should fairly elect the next President....

- The Evening Telegraph, Philadelphia, Thursday, July 16, 1868. Vol. X--No. 13. Pg. 2.
PrinceofDarkness

Sydney, Australia

#21 Nov 11, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
"The passage in General Wade Hampton's speech at the Union square ratification meeting which the Times held up to reprobation, is the following:
"We can have no relief unless this great Democratic party will come out, and pledge itself that we shall have a fair election--that the white people of the South shall vote; and I want you all to register an oath that, when they do vote, that these votes shall be counted, and if there is a majority of white votes, that, you will place Seymour and Blair in the White House, in spite of all the bayonets that shall be brought against them. I only want to see the election fair, and if they do that, even with the incubus of black rule, we can carry the Southern States."

"We find nothing in this to disapprove. We should deprecate the necessity of a resort to force, but we pour scorn upon the craven, the pusillanimous notion that freemen may not vindicate their rights by arms. Courage to resist oppression is the ultimate security for good government. This, at least, was the opinion of our brave forefathers when they took care to provide in the Constitution that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The right to bear arms implies the right, on a sufficient provocation, to use them. The only debatable question relates to the sufficiency of the provocation.
"If the Democratic party should fairly elect the next President....
- The Evening Telegraph, Philadelphia, Thursday, July 16, 1868. Vol. X--No. 13. Pg. 2.
RIGHT TO WIPE

http://www.sovereignman.com/wp-content/upload...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#23 Nov 11, 2013
PrinceofDarkness wrote:
"THE MINUTE MEDICINE.--Radway's Ready Relief is truly a minute medicine for it will cure in minutes diseases that other remedies require hours and days to effect; and it will relieve the agnostic pain of acute and inflamatory diseases in seconds, when all other remedies fail altogether.
"Radway's Ready Relief should be kept in the house as arms are kept in self-defence, or a fire-escape for safety from a sudden conflagration. Hundreds die from a sudden attacks of disease that one dose of it would save. Persons subject to fits..."

- The Burlington Free Press, Friday Morning, January 11, 1861. Vol. XXXVII-New Series Vol. VII. Number Ywenty-Eight. Pg. 5.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#24 Nov 11, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
January 11, 1861
Waitress:...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top

... and spam...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#25 Nov 11, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Waitress:...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top
... and spam...
FREEDOM OF SPEECH.-- When Lord Byron's "forest-born Demosthenes" thundered against Virginia's aceptance of the "constitution of 1787," until his amendments, which guaranteed free speech, free assemblage, etc., were embodied in it, he did so in the belif, which was general then, that such constitutional safe-guards would prove sufficient to protect posterity in its "inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," and I think they wouldhave been if federalist judges had not twisted and tortured the whole instrument into a slave-making and slave-perpetuating machine.

Given a free press, free speech and the right to carry and bear arms, a people worthy of liberty can secure and maintain it, but in the absence of these essentials liberty is but a name, a mere ghost.

The question of a free press is the question which I am most interested in just now. Plutocracy and its allied interests have secured control of almost all great daily newspapers and use them to mislead the masses of the people.

A people fighting to regain control of their government must readily see the necessity of having and maintaining a daily newspaper in a great city like Chicago, for, say what we may, Chicago is and will be the storm center of the present and future struggles for industrial liberty...."

- T.P. Quinn, THE DAY BOOK An Adless Newspaper, Daily Except Sunday VOL. 5, NO. 97 Chicago, Friday, Jan. 21, 1916 Pg. 27.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Best AR-15 How to Choose the Best AR-Style Ri... (Sep '15) 5 hr SummerBB8 10
News The news media love America. The government, no... 8 hr FormerParatrooper 65
LAX Ammo Photo Contest/Giveaway! Sep 21 KTSullivan 2
Taurus Gaucho Revolver (May '06) Sep 16 Senb12 29
News Lawyer: 'Pharma Bro' joking about bounty for Cl... Sep 13 Jeff Brightone 2
News Ryan Blocking Concealed Carry Reciprocity, Cong... Sep 11 FormerParatrooper 1
News D.C. Requests Hearing on Protection of Second A... Sep 10 Lou Posey 3
More from around the web