Moms make case for gun control

Moms make case for gun control

There are 9283 comments on the usatoday.com story from Mar 16, 2013, titled Moms make case for gun control. In it, usatoday.com reports that:

Peg Paulson had never beaten a path through the halls of Congress before or met a U.S. senator's staffer or advocated for a controversial issue.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at usatoday.com.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1521 May 9, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
While your perverse fascination with "Vikings"
The vein in your forehead is throbbing, GayDavy.

We both know you cannot think on your own, that is one your only trick is to continue to post spam of quotes of people who are more clever than you- which I am afraid is everyone in the history of time.

Time for yet another new alias, Shug.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1522 May 9, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The vein in your forehead is throbbing, GayDavy.
We both know you cannot think on your own, that is one your only trick is to continue to post spam of quotes of people who are more clever than you- which I am afraid is everyone in the history of time.
Time for yet another new alias, Shug.
Another perverse attempt at deflection, eh traitor-troll? That's all you have left after all. For you have totally LOST any and ALL debates on the subject.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1523 May 9, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Another perverse attempt at deflection, eh traitor-troll?
We both know that welfare medicare will take care of your high blood pressure, GayDavy, if you have already sponged every last nickle you can get from your mom.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1524 May 9, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
We both know that welfare medicare will take care of your high blood pressure, GayDavy, if you have already sponged every last nickle you can get from your mom.
"Another perverse attempt at deflection, eh traitor-troll? That's all you have left after all. For you have totally LOST any and ALL debates on the subject."
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#1525 May 9, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet we can be sure that those found "not guilty" were innocent of any crime.
Right, OJ?
PS: This REPUBLICAN who is prosecutor of zimmerman the pedophile has the highest rate of convictions in the state.
She has a very high rate of black prosecutions and most tend to use public defenders.

'It is a known fact that Corey transfers more juveniles into the adult criminal system than any other county in Florida on average, but what most people donít know is that Corey also moves a much greater percentage of black males into the adult system than the rest of Florida as a whole.
And this is odd. Because the 4th judicial circuit is made up of a majority of white people. Why is there such a huge disparity when it comes to the number of black males tried as adults? Why is this disparity continuing unquestioned?.
http://justice4juveniles.wordpress.com/2012/0...

You never gave proof that Zimmerman is a pedophile so like usual you make claims you can not prove.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1526 May 9, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Another perverse attempt at deflection,"
You have no independent thought, GayDavy.

Well.. no one here is surprised.

I've calculated your independent thoughts against your copy and pasts and clearly, carried to two decimal points:

You ain't got sh!t, GayDavy.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1527 May 9, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
<quoted text>
She has a very high rate of black prosecutions
We all know dem color folk go down easy for dat plea bargin, eh, DongLiqueur?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1528 May 9, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
You never gave proof that Zimmerman .
Pedophile wasn't arrested for molesting children.

Yet.
Clueless Defense

Mountain View, CA

#1529 May 10, 2013
We all know this wouldn't be an issue for gun nuts and fanatics if Zimmerman used a knife.

There would be no reason for them to support him in the least then.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1530 May 10, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no independent thought, GayDavy.
Well.. no one here is surprised.
I've calculated your independent thoughts against your copy and pasts and clearly, carried to two decimal points:
You ain't got sh!t, GayDavy.
"I will not go to the gentleman's State, or to any other gentleman's State, to find laws that I do not approve. We have plenty of them in my own State. And the gentleman ought to feel highly blessed if he has none in Indiana that he disapproves. We have a great many in Georgia I do not approve. There is one in particular which I fought in the legislature and opposed before the courts with all the power that I had. It was a law making it penal to bear concealed deadly weapons. I am individually opposed to bearing such weapons. I never bear weapons of any sort; but I believed that it was the constitutional right of every American citizen to bear arms if he chooses, and just such arms, and in just such way, as he chooses. I thought that it was the birthright of every Georgian to do it. I was defeated in our legislature. I was defeated before our courts. The question went up to the highest judicial tribunal in our State, the Supreme Court*, which sustained the law." [*Nunn v. State, 1 Ga.(1 Kel.) 243 (1846).]

- Hon. Alexander H. Stephens, June 28, 1856, U.S. House of Representatives.(Mr. Stephens served as a U.S. Representative from Georgia,(before and after the Civil War). He was also Vice President of the Confederate States of America, and the 50th Governor of Georgia from 1882 until his death in 1883).

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1531 May 10, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"I will not go
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1532 May 10, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
Hon. Alexander H. Stephens,
American traitor.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#1533 May 10, 2013
Clueless Defense wrote:
We all know this wouldn't be an issue for gun nuts and fanatics if Zimmerman used a knife.

There would be no reason for them to support him in the least then.
Depends. Would you want to ban certain knives? Knives are still considered arms, and thus protected under the second amendment.
As far as the Zimmerman/Martin case, self defense is self defense. Stand your ground is stand your ground, regardless of the defensive tool utilized.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1534 May 10, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Depends. Would you want to ban certain knives? Knives are still considered arms, and thus protected under the second amendment.
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Next?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1535 May 10, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
As far as the Zimmerman/Martin case, self defense is self defense.
And murder is murder.

And the the pedophile chased down this boy who had every right to be where he was at and shot him dead.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1536 May 10, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
Stand your ground is stand your ground, regardless of the defensive tool utilized.
The key to standing your ground is standing your ground.

You do not get to chase someone for three blocks and then say you were standing your ground, especially after you were told by the police to wait for officers who are on the way.

The reason the pedophile's defense team is not pursing SYG is: the pedophile was chasing, not standing.
Gustavo

United States

#1537 May 10, 2013
Ninthman wrote:
Obama has put a gag order on the survivors of Benghazi. What's that tell you about our piece of shit, lying, President?
.
Should he be the one telling us to do anything?
George W Bush, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties." --discussing the Iraq war with Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson in 2003, as quoted by Robertson.

To prove this, he censored the press from covering the arrival home of thousands of dead soldiers.

BTW: There were 68 attacks on US embassies under George W Bush that resulted in 98 deaths. None were ever investigated. Under Obama there have been about 5.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1538 May 10, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
American traitor.
Hon. Alexander H. Stephens, June 28, 1856, U.S. House of Representatives.(Mr. Stephens served as a U.S. Representative from Georgia,(before and after the Civil War). He was also Vice President of the Confederate States of America,

>>>>>>> >>Mr. Stephens served as a U.S. Representative from Georgia,(before and after the Civil War).<<<<< <<<<<

>>>>>>> >>and the 50th Governor of Georgia from 1882 until his death in 1883).<<<<<< <<<<

Do you understand English, traitor-troll?

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1539 May 10, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The key to standing your ground is standing your ground.
You do not get to chase someone for three blocks and then say you were standing your ground, especially after you were told by the police to wait for officers who are on the way.
The reason the pedophile's defense team is not pursing SYG is: the pedophile was chasing, not standing.
"...A man may repel force by force in defense of his person, habitation, or property against one who manifestly intends and endeavors, by violence or surprise, to commit a known felony, such as murder, rape, robbery, arson, burglary, and the like, upon either. In these cases he is not obliged to retreat, but may pursue his adversary until he has secured himself from all danger; and if he kill him in so doing it is called justifiable self-defense..."-- Mr. Justice HARLAN, U.S. Supreme Court, Beard v. U.S., May 27, 1895.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1540 May 10, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And murder is murder.
And the the pedophile chased down this boy who had every right to be where he was at and shot him dead.
"...The law has grown, and even if historical mistakes have contributed to its growth it has tended in the direction of rules consistent with human nature. Many respectable writers agree that if a man reasonably believes that he is in immediate danger of death or grievous bodily harm from his assailant he may stand his ground and that if he kills him he has not succeeded the bounds of lawful self defence. That has been the decision of this Court. Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550, 559, 15 S. Sup. Ct. 962. Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife. Therefore in this Court, at least, it is not a condition of immunity that one in that situation should pause to consider whether a reasonable man might not think it possible to fly with safety or to disable his assailant rather than to kill him..."--Mr. Justice [Oliver Wendell] HOLMES, U.S. Supreme Court, BROWN v. UNITED STATES, 256 U.S. 335 (1921).

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The new Wild West: Sacramento's sheriff issues ... 4 hr RayOne 1
News Packing pistols: Is Texas safer with more licen... (Jul '11) 19 hr Public farts 6
News Suspect in Louisiana theatre rampage had histor... Jul 28 El Chapo 56
News Local Jews upset by Holocaust references in cam... (Jun '12) Jul 27 swedenforever 123
News Louisiana Moms, Aurora Theater Shooting Survivo... Jul 25 payme 2
News Why assault rifle sales are booming Jul 24 Here Is One 242
News Legal Loophole: Concealed carry law Jul 24 CGiven 2
More from around the web