Moms make case for gun control

There are 20 comments on the Mar 16, 2013, usatoday.com story titled Moms make case for gun control. In it, usatoday.com reports that:

Peg Paulson had never beaten a path through the halls of Congress before or met a U.S. senator's staffer or advocated for a controversial issue.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at usatoday.com.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7239 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now... he's still recovering from the tattooed man from the circus.
Can see you have reached a new level of lame. You've become even more pathetic than before. How low can you go? I'm sure you'll lamely attempt show us...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7240 Nov 1, 2013
PrinceofDarkness wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah, I know... conspiracy.. yeah... ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, AP, MSN etc....they are all in a conspiracy.. bwhhahahahhahha.... LOSER...
Actually, it is a proven and admitted FACT that they were all bought and paid for about one hundred years ago. And they have been spreading propaganda and lies every since. But we could hardly expect someone of your moral and intellectual fiber to comprehend that fact.

You put down Alex Jones of InfoWars before. Yet, how is it that he provides HARD EVIDENCE for EVERY statement he makes?

You have proven that you are nothing more than a willing hireling and sycophant.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7241 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Hey queenie, here's one for you:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."
You mean you lie?

And the fact you don't know the words to the Second Amendment "stings" me?

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!

I appreciate you repeating your ignorance. Other gun gnutters no doubt insist you are a plant to make them all look even more stupid.

Do insist: keep posting.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7242 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Can see you have reached a new level of lame.
What alias are you on now, honey?

If you had some pride in your opinion or anything you say, why do you keep changing your alias?

You see, Shug: you can't get beyond your own stupidity. You obviously haven't learned anything new for years.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7243 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, it is a proven and admitted FACT that they were all bought and paid for about one hundred years ago.
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH1

That's some real FACTS you got there, shug.

Especially since most did not exist one hundred years ago.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7245 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
What alias are you on now, honey?
If you had some pride in your opinion or anything you say, why do you keep changing your alias?
You see, Shug: you can't get beyond your own stupidity. You obviously haven't learned anything new for years.
"Here, then, every man,--whether native or naturalized, whether free or bond--for the provision comprehended every class and colour--every man capable of shouldering a musket, was required to be trained and armed, by our present Constitution; and the proposed to it, designates the militia as only to be for defence, and in this view Blackstone himself regarded the militia. The very second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, previous to which several of the States had refused to come into the compact, he begged to recommend to the attention of his friend from Allegheny,(Mr. Forward)--"a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Mark the admirable adaption of the language. There is said (Mr. I) an argument in it more than I could make in a year, all condensed. A regulated right of every man, to do what? To hear arms--and the Constitution says this right to bear arms "shall not be infringed." This "well regulated militia," which is "necessary to the security of a free State" is the right of every man to bear arms, and it is a right which "shall not be infringed." And when his friend from Allegheny said at first,(as he had understood him,) that the federal power absorbed all the rights of the states on this subject, he (.Mr I) confessed that he had felt himself excited almost to pugnacity. This right exceeded, was beyond the reach of the federal Constitution--it was supreme, above the supremacy of the Constitution--it was a right which the Constitution could not touch. It was nothing less than man's right to self defence, that power which could not be impaired by any power of government."

- Mr. Charles Jared Ingersoll, Oct. 24, 1837, PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE CONVENTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, TO PROPOSE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION, COMMENCED AT HARRISBURG MAY 2 1837 VOL. IV. Reported by JOHN AGG, Stenographer: Assisted By Messrs. Wheeler, Kingman, Draks, and McKinley. HARRISBURG: PRINTED BY PACKER, BARRETT, And PARKE. 1838.(Ingersoll served twice as a United States representative, first from 1813 to 1815 and again from 1841 to 1847. In between these terms, he worked as the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from 1815 to 1829 by appointment from President James Madison, was Pennsylvania state representative in 1830, and in 1837, was a delegate to the Pennsylvania state constitutional convention. Over the course of his governmental career, Ingersoll worked with a few U. S. presidents such as James Monroe, John Tyler, and James K. Polk).

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7246 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean you lie?
And the fact you don't know the words to the Second Amendment "stings" me?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
I appreciate you repeating your ignorance. Other gun gnutters no doubt insist you are a plant to make them all look even more stupid.
Do insist: keep posting.
The Preamble to The Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to PREVENT MISCONSTRUCTION or ABUSE of its powers, that further DECLARATORY and RESTRICTIVE clauses should be added: And as EXTENDING the ground of PUBLIC CONFIDENCE in the Government, will BEST ENSURE the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, ALL, or any of which Articles, when RATIFIED by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be VALID to ALL INTENTS and PURPOSES, as PART of the said Constitution; viz.]

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution....

...Amendment II

DECLARATORY clause;

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,

RESTRICTIVE clause;

the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, shall NOT be infringed.

To bad for you and your kind, eh?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7247 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
The Preamble to The Bill of Rights
Nothing to do with the Second Amendment Spooge Sponge.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7248 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Oct. 24, 1837
'nuff said.

Justice Scalia: still alive.

“gun control takes two hands”

Since: Mar 13

outdoors

#7249 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean you lie?
And the fact you don't know the words to the Second Amendment "stings" me?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
I appreciate you repeating your ignorance. Other gun gnutters no doubt insist you are a plant to make them all look even more stupid.
Do insist: keep posting.
He's close enough- you might have gotten confused (as usual) because he didn't try to "arm bears"- that is likely what confused you.

“gun control takes two hands”

Since: Mar 13

outdoors

#7250 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH1
That's some real FACTS you got there, shug.
Especially since most did not exist one hundred years ago.
Prove it, Closet Homosexual. There are books full of things you think you know but you're too stoopid to realize it.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7251 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing to do with the Second Amendment Spooge Sponge.
Wow, you've sunk to a new low. Must be that depression from being dethroned....

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7252 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
'nuff said.
Justice Scalia: still alive.
Nothing more than a hired servant of We The People. And, We The People's Constitution EXPRESSLY declares:

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."

We The People's Constitution wins again.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7254 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing more than a hired servant of We The People. And, We The People's Constitution EXPRESSLY declares:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."
We The People's Constitution wins again.
barefoot2626 would like to see the 14th amendment repealed so the Liberals(bigots) and barefoot2626 kind in Washington DC could force their beliefs onto whole United States just like what the Radical Republicans tried to do to the states and it resulted into a Civil War.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7255 Nov 1, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>barefoot2626 would like to see the 14th amendment repealed so the Liberals(bigots) and barefoot2626 kind in Washington DC could force their beliefs onto whole United States just like what the Radical Republicans tried to do to the states and it resulted into a Civil War.
Your revisionist theories of history are interesting only to yourself. Perhaps you should give reality a try?

“gun control takes two hands”

Since: Mar 13

outdoors

#7257 Nov 1, 2013
PrinceofDarkness wrote:
<quoted text>
do you need a roll?
http://www.sovereignman.com/wp-content/upload...
FYI, no one is going to open your links, sport- we aren't interested in what rings your bell...well maybe the Closet Homosexual will look.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7258 Nov 1, 2013
huntcoyotes wrote:
<quoted text>FYI, no one is going to open your links, sport- we aren't interested in what rings your bell...well maybe the Closet Homosexual will look.
You got that right!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7259 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Your revisionist theories of history are interesting only to yourself. Perhaps you should give reality a try?
your the revisionist and come to real world and you will see why you are flawed in your thinking which ty a chanceis why I believe you are pro Obama and Liberal and that is control over the states just like Lincoln.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7260 Nov 1, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>your the revisionist and come to real world and you will see why you are flawed in your thinking which ty a chanceis why I believe you are pro Obama and Liberal and that is control over the states just like Lincoln.
Wow, talk about delusional. Perhaps you should revisit your doctor and have him change your psych. med. prescription [AGAIN]. You might also want to go back to high school and learn proper sentence structure as well.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7261 Nov 1, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, talk about delusional. Perhaps you should revisit your doctor and have him change your psych. med. prescription [AGAIN]. You might also want to go back to high school and learn proper sentence structure as well.
You better visit the doctor soon and be professionally checked for delusional schizophrenia and like I said before you need to go back and take classes on US History and US Government epecially the changes to the US Constitution after the Civil War which I posted the links to Reconstruction Amendments and for some reason you are skipping that fact which I believe is intentional that you are avoiding besides using your thinking Blacks are still property to the White Man and have no rights under your US Constituion you are referring to which they would not under the Orginal wording of the US Constitution which was another reason for the Reconstruction Amendments after the US Civil War to the US Constitution but unfortunately the 14th amendment was flawed besides prior to the Civil War in 1833 the SCOTUS stated in Barron v. Baltimore that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government, but not to any state government which we all live in a state and each state has its own government & constitution which is different from state to state.

Incorporation of the Bill of Rights

The incorporation of the Bill of Rights (or incorporation for short) is the process by which American courts have applied portions of the U.S. Bill of Rights to the states. Prior to 1925, the Bill of Rights was held only to apply to the federal government. Under the incorporation doctrine, most provisions of the Bill of Rights now also apply to the state and local governments.

Prior to the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and the development of the incorporation doctrine, the Supreme Court in 1833 held in Barron v. Baltimore that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal, but not any state governments.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sheriff, lawyer dispute whether 73-year-old dep... 11 min Truth and Facts 43
Democrats: Get A $2,000 Tax Credit For Turning ... Apr 20 Truth and Facts 13
Kahr CW40 PROBLEM (Dec '08) Apr 17 OlFed 48
News Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) Apr 15 AMERICA 12,178
News Local Jews upset by Holocaust references in cam... (Jun '12) Apr 13 swedenforever 112
News Who's calling the shots in Canada? Apr 10 Truth and Facts 2
Suspect in Arizona Shooting Spree a White Supre... Apr 5 Truth and Facts 82
More from around the web