D.C. chief: 'We will arrest armed pro...

D.C. chief: 'We will arrest armed protesters'

There are 648 comments on the Examiner.com story from May 11, 2013, titled D.C. chief: 'We will arrest armed protesters'. In it, Examiner.com reports that:

Armed protesters who plan to march across the Arlington Memorial Bridge into Washington, D.C. on July 4 will have a special greeting committee awaiting them on the other side.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Examiner.com.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#104 May 12, 2013
88
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> depends on the state, you might not be allowed to have it loaded or keep it in the trunk, or keep the ammo in the car and the gun in the trunk, or not have ammo at all, or have the gun in the car and the ammo in the trunk, or, aw heck, why should all that matter if you can legally own it? One thing is for sure, u and I won't be finding out.
Only a fool brings a gun into communist ruled D.C.

But 20,000 armed Americans crossing the Potomac from Virginia into D.C. can do it without any fear of antigun police.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#105 May 12, 2013
92
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>the law is the law and has been settled by the Supreme Court. Not agreeing with a law is not a valid defense for breaking it
They can legally protest the law without breaking it, but that is not the choice they are making. It's a stupid move
The law requires all communists to be sodomized monthly. "The law is the law."

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#106 May 12, 2013
94
barefoot2626 wrote:
Why do you lie every time you open your mouth, GayDavy?
Kentucky enacted the first carrying concealed weapon statute in the United States in 1813.
Wipe your lying mouth, GayDavy.
You have a big wad running down your chin.
It was unConstitutional and probably a Jim Crow law.

Only communists should be forced to obey Jim Crow laws.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#107 May 12, 2013
100
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>obviously the Supreme Court ....you know those people who have actuall constitutional law degree....they say you're wrong. Who should I believe? This is tough.....the Supreme Court, or the crazy guy from the Internet with no education
I will need to mull this over for awhile
The SCOTUS is wrong. The single sentence of the 2nd amendment is easy to understand. It prohibits govts from regulating our weapons.

Dred Scott. Japanese/American WWII Internment.
FFS- wrote:
I will need to mull this over for awhile
You will injure your commie brain.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#108 May 12, 2013
49:
Tory II wrote:
If 20,000 armed people arrive and assemble, the cops will be rendered powerless (and terrified).

But be warned, gun owners, the cops will be in your crowd spying on you. The cops will come from Virginia too. There will be police snipers hiding on roof tops. So everyone watch your backs. When a cop raises his weapon be ready...

You will have three options:

1)jail
2)be shot by communists
3)shoot communists

The D.C. chief pig is a communist. She's famous for saying the safety of cops trumps the Constitution. Never forget this: the 2nd amendment supporter cops hate your guns. They believe they're superior to you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
mike wrote:
Your mouth bigger than that water pistol you pack.You call everybody communist no doubt your not very intelligent-its clear you probably write down license plate numbers and call the cops saying theres commies out there.Think again before you think that hauling artillery around in DC will cower the cops they deal with gangs that will make you look like choir boys so if you want to scream commie fine just remember if you shoot a cop youl know personally the phrase better dead than red..
&fe ature=player_embedded
That is

Huntsville, AL

#109 May 12, 2013
Tory II wrote:
92<quoted text>The law requires all communists to be sodomized monthly. "The law is the law."


why this freak calls everybody communists. He believe this is true and is hoping for some action.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#110 May 12, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>the law is the law and has been settled by the Supreme Court. Not agreeing with a law is not a valid defense for breaking it
They can legally protest the law without breaking it, but that is not the choice they are making. It's a stupid move
Not quite, traitor-troll:

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

The USURPreme Kourt CANNOT invalidate the Constitution - THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.

"Also, the conditions and circumstances of the period require a finding that while the stated purpose of the right to arms was to secure a well-regulated militia, the right to self-defense was assumed by the Framers."--Chief Justice John Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court.[As quoted in Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 251 (1846); State v. Dawson, 272 N.C. 535, 159 S.E.2d 1, 9 (1968).]

"Those then who controvert the principle that the Constitution is to be considered, in court as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution, and see only law.

"This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written Constitutions ... It would be giving to the legislature a practical and real omnipotence, with the same breath, which professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure.

"That it thus reduces to nothing what we have deemed the greatest improvement on political institutions--a written Constitution--would of itself be sufficient, in America, where written Constitutions have been viewed with so much reverence, for rejecting the Constitution."

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void."--Chief Justice Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison, 5, U.S.(Cranch) 137, 174,176.]

Why are you joined in the conspiracy to overthrow We The People's Constitution? And this by defending the tyrannical usurpations perpetrated by our perverse public servants in governments? In order to betray your fellow citizens into slavery? What was the price paid to you for your treachory? Was it more than the thirty pieces of silver paid to Judas?

Take a hike, you vile treasonous troll.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#111 May 12, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>YOU have no say in what's constitutional, as you are just a crazy guy on the Internet. The USSC DOES determine what is constitutional....and they have disagreed with you. You should call them and tell them they are wrong....maybe they'll take another look at it. Lol
WRONG AGAIN, traitor-troll:

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

"An amendment of the constitution is of still higher authority, for it has the effect of controlling and repealing the express provisions of the constitution authorizing a power to be exercised, by a declaration that it shall not be construed to give such power. 3 Dall 382.

"We have stated to you the various provisions of the constitution of the United States and its amendments, as well as that of this state; you see their authority and obligation to be supreme over any laws or regulations which are repugnant to them, or which violate, infringe or impair any right thereby secured; the conclusions which result are too obvious to be more than stated."

- U.S. Supreme Court Justice BALDWIN, Circuit Court of The United States,[PENNSYLVANIA APRIL TERM 1833 BEFORE Hon. HENRY BALDWIN, Associate Justice of the [U.S.] Supreme Court, Hon JOSEPH HOPKINSON District Judge, Johnson v Tompkins,(13 F. Cas. 840 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1833)), and others.]

"It is the peculiar value of a written constitution that it places in unchanging form limitations upon the legislation and thus gives a permanence and stability to popular government which otherwise would be lacking."--Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412.

"When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and NO ONE is bound to obey it."--State v Sutton,[Source: 63 Minn 167, 65 NW 262, 30 LRA 630]

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."--Miranda v Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436, 491 (1966).

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

Take a hike, traitor-troll.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#112 May 12, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do chin.
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

Why are you joined in the conspiracy to overthrow We The People's Constitution? And this by defending the tyrannical usurpations perpetrated by our perverse public servants in governments? In order to betray your fellow citizens into slavery? What was the price paid to you for your treachory? Was it more than the thirty pieces of silver paid to Judas?

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#113 May 12, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>ob
Care to explain THIS, traitor-troll?-

Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan;

“September 8, 1951 (1)

“Japan has this day signed a Treaty of Peace with the Allied Powers.(2) On the coming into force of that Treaty, Japan will not have the effective means to exercise its inherent right of self-defense because it has been disarmed.

“There is danger to Japan in this situation because irresponsible militarism has not yet been driven from the world. Therefore Japan desires a Security Treaty with the United States of America to come into force simultaneously with the Treaty of Peace between the United States of America and Japan.

“The Treaty of Peace recognizes that Japan as a sovereign nation has the right to enter into collective security arrangements, and further, the Charter of the United Nations recognizes that all nations possess an inherent right of individual and collective self-defense.*

“In exercise of these rights, Japan desires, as a provisional arrangement for its defense, that the United States of America should maintain armed forces of its own in and about Japan so as to deter armed attack upon Japan.

“The United States of America, in the interest of peace and security, is presently willing to maintain certain of its armed forces in and about Japan, in the expectation, however, that Japan will itself increasingly assume responsibility for its own defense against direct and indirect aggression, always avoiding any armament which could be an offensive threat or serve other than to promote peace and security in accordance with the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter.”

So, let me see if I understand this correctly. Our government signed a treaty with the Japan. Which had been guilty of GENOCIDE, and various other gross violations of civilized warfare. And then they acknowledge that our ENEMY had an inherent right to self-defense? And yet our same perversely HYPOCRITICAL government has been actively working to undermine our Second Amendment Right, enumerated in our OWN Constitution? Explain, please.....
mhmdAbn

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#114 May 12, 2013
((( O people Say No God But Allah, Achieve Eternal Salvation )))

" Laa illaha illa lah ." (There is none worthy of worship except Allah.)

( I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and I bear witness that Muhammad is His servant and messenger )

 http://aslam-ahmd.blogspot.co m

( Introduction to Islam )
mhmdAbn

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#115 May 12, 2013
((( O people Say No God But Allah, Achieve Eternal Salvation )))

" Laa illaha illa lah ." (There is none worthy of worship except Allah.)

( I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and I bear witness that Muhammad is His servant and messenger )

( Introduction to Islam )

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#116 May 12, 2013
mhmdAbn wrote:
((( O people Say No God But Allah, Achieve Eternal Salvation )))
" Laa illaha illa lah ." (There is none worthy of worship except Allah.)
( I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and I bear witness that Muhammad is His servant and messenger )
( Introduction to Islam )
Jesus Christ is the Lord, and EVERY knee shall bow, and EVERY tongue shall confess Him.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#117 May 12, 2013
mhmdAbn wrote:
((( O people Say No God But Allah, Achieve Eternal Salvation )))
" Laa illaha illa lah ." (There is none worthy of worship except Allah.)
( I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and I bear witness that Muhammad is His servant and messenger )
( Introduction to Islam )
"Jesus answered, I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."--Jesus Christ, John 14:6
d pantz

United States

#118 May 13, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>the law is the law and has been settled by the Supreme Court. Not agreeing with a law is not a valid defense for breaking it
They can legally protest the law without breaking it, but that is not the choice they are making. It's a stupid move
duh. That's why its called "protest" and its legal if a certain # of people do it peacefully.
But see the posts on here? That probably isn't going to go well.
You idiots better not shoot at the cops, really. It will ruin the whole point of it. If they shoot don't shoot back, stay peaceful, remember the impact of kent state in ohio. Make them the assholes.
d pantz

United States

#119 May 13, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus Christ is the Lord, and EVERY knee shall bow, and EVERY tongue shall confess Him.
dude go to the ssm threads. Tons of people debating the bible on there. I never knew the left was so "religious".
d pantz

United States

#120 May 13, 2013
Tory II wrote:
88<quoted text>Only a fool brings a gun into communist ruled D.C.
But 20,000 armed Americans crossing the Potomac from Virginia into D.C. can do it without any fear of antigun police.
well I must say you have king kong balls sir and I hope there isn't any violence escalated from either side.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#121 May 13, 2013
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> dude go to the ssm threads. Tons of people debating the bible on there. I never knew the left was so "religious".
Are you smoking CRACK? I'm about as far to the RIGHT as one can possibly get. Shove off, clown.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#122 May 13, 2013
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> well I must say you have king kong balls sir and I hope there isn't any violence escalated from either side.
Go back to your gun-free utopia, traitor.

The violence will come from the D.C. pigs.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#123 May 13, 2013
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> duh. That's why its called "protest" and its legal if a certain # of people do it peacefully.
But see the posts on here? That probably isn't going to go well.
You idiots better not shoot at the cops, really. It will ruin the whole point of it. If they shoot don't shoot back, stay peaceful, remember the impact of kent state in ohio. Make them the assholes.
Half of America are communists. The mainstream newsmedia is communist and hates guns. The cops know this and will gladly shoot gun owners knowing the Press won't defend gun owners.

You're advocating the gun owners should allow communists to shoot them. You're a pig.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Reader Reaction Forum: Will concealed carry mak... (Jun '11) Jan 17 Hendo 45
Safe carry Jan 16 javawhey 21
News Secret sting operation by the GAO blows away th... Jan 12 Say What 3
News Malloy: Bump stocks should be banned in Connect... Jan 12 Say What 3
News NJ's new governor could sue feds over concealed... Jan 5 jimwildrickjr 2
News ATF Seeking Public Comment on Proposed Bump Sto... Jan 5 Say What 4
News Military must meet FBI database requirements Jan 4 Watchdog 4
More from around the web