Texas law professor calls for repeal ...

Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second Amendment

There are 12127 comments on the BizPacReview.com story from Nov 17, 2013, titled Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second Amendment. In it, BizPacReview.com reports that:

A professor at the Texas A&M University School of Law claims that the Second Amendment should be shelved and replaced with something else.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at BizPacReview.com.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2815 Dec 31, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's designed to put the fear of God into criminal demonrats.
It's designed to kill.

But I know you have a quota: at least one lie per post.

It sure put the fear into those six year old children, though.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2816 Dec 31, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
1 Alaska: homicides per 100,000: 20 RED STATE
2 Louisiana: homicides per 100,000: 19.5 RED STATE
3 Wyoming: homicides per 100,000: 18.8 RED STATE
4 Arizona: homicides per 100,000: 18 RED STATE
5 Nevada: homicides per 100,000: 17.3 Purple STATE
5 Mississippi: homicides per 100,000: 17.3 RED STATE
7 New Mexico: homicides per 100,000: 16.6 Blue
8 Arkansas: homicides per 100,000: 16.3 RED STATE
9 Alabama: homicides per 100,000: 16.2 RED STATE
10 Tennessee: homicides per 100,000: 15.4 RED STATE

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2817 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact.
You think it was invented for target shooting?
Anything else, dear?
Yeah, you need to put your bib back on. As you are getting the floor wet with your incessant mindless drooling.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2818 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's designed to kill.
But I know you have a quota: at least one lie per post.
It sure put the fear into those six year old children, though.
No, the treasonous demonrat agenda is designed to kill.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2819 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
Every bit a true Christian as you.
Then... you know about as much as Christianity as you do constitutional law.
Know the truth about both more than you ever will, traitor-troll.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2820 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
1 Alaska: homicides per 100,000: 20 RED STATE
2 Louisiana: homicides per 100,000: 19.5 RED STATE
3 Wyoming: homicides per 100,000: 18.8 RED STATE
4 Arizona: homicides per 100,000: 18 RED STATE
5 Nevada: homicides per 100,000: 17.3 Purple STATE
5 Mississippi: homicides per 100,000: 17.3 RED STATE
7 New Mexico: homicides per 100,000: 16.6 Blue
8 Arkansas: homicides per 100,000: 16.3 RED STATE
9 Alabama: homicides per 100,000: 16.2 RED STATE
10 Tennessee: homicides per 100,000: 15.4 RED STATE
Already proven to be false, troll.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2821 Dec 31, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Yeah, you need to put your bib back on.
You need new material.

You certainly can't respond with actual facts, the least you can do is come up with something new in five years.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2822 Dec 31, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Already proven to be false, troll.
Already sourced.

Wipe your chin, Sod0mite.

We don't need your approval.
Gun Control Does Not Work

United States

#2823 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Already sourced.
Wipe your chin, Sod0mite.
We don't need your approval.
All lies.....

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2824 Dec 31, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the treasonous demonrat agenda is designed to kill.
yes yes, Sod0mite.

the vein in your forehead is throbbing.

Calm blue ocean...

The AR-15 was designed to kill humans. It was originally designed as a military weapon to be sold to the DoD for use by the infantry to replace the M1.

Designed to kill humans.

Not target shooting.

And of course not hunting.
Gun Control Does Not Work

United States

#2825 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You need new material.
You certainly can't respond with actual facts, the least you can do is come up with something new in five years.
More barefoot lies......
Gun Control Does Not Work

United States

#2826 Dec 31, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Lanza was definitely a demonrat, as the preponderance of evidence clearly indicates.
Yes he was......undoubtedly the product of a very progressive liberal upbringing. I was told that there had been Obama campaign signs on the family's front lawn......that is all the proof I needed.
Gun Control Does Not Work

United States

#2828 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
yes yes, Sod0mite.
the vein in your forehead is throbbing.
Calm blue ocean...
The AR-15 was designed to kill humans. It was originally designed as a military weapon to be sold to the DoD for use by the infantry to replace the M1.
Designed to kill humans.
Not target shooting.
And of course not hunting.
It was a civilian design first. The Air Force was the first branch to look at the AR15. It was designed for self protection. Currently used as a target and hunting rifle. Most popular rifle in the US. Oh, and Heller says YOU CAN'T BAN IT. Hahahahahahahaha.
Gun Control Does Not Work

United States

#2829 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
1 Alaska: homicides per 100,000: 20 RED STATE
2 Louisiana: homicides per 100,000: 19.5 RED STATE
3 Wyoming: homicides per 100,000: 18.8 RED STATE
4 Arizona: homicides per 100,000: 18 RED STATE
5 Nevada: homicides per 100,000: 17.3 Purple STATE
5 Mississippi: homicides per 100,000: 17.3 RED STATE
7 New Mexico: homicides per 100,000: 16.6 Blue
8 Arkansas: homicides per 100,000: 16.3 RED STATE
9 Alabama: homicides per 100,000: 16.2 RED STATE
10 Tennessee: homicides per 100,000: 15.4 RED STATE
Flagged as Spam

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2831 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You need new material.
You certainly can't respond with actual facts, the least you can do is come up with something new in five years.
Can't help that your LIEberal agenda prevents you from seeing or acknowledging the facts. Your own evil has contributed much to your blindness. And shall be the cause of your impending destruction.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2832 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Already sourced.
Wipe your chin, Sod0mite.
We don't need your approval.
You will never get my approval, vile Sod0mite.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2833 Dec 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
yes yes, Sod0mite.
the vein in your forehead is throbbing.
Calm blue ocean...
The AR-15 was designed to kill humans. It was originally designed as a military weapon to be sold to the DoD for use by the infantry to replace the M1.
Designed to kill humans.
Not target shooting.
And of course not hunting.
No, that's how LIEberals use weapons. We, the normal people, use them as defensive weapons and for target practice.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2834 Dec 31, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
In the likely event any of you happen to come in contact with the schizophrenics called 2ndAmRight, Marauder , ArmedVeteran or huntcoyotes and/or any of his aliases.. immediately hide your children.
A panel of experts has recently determined that this poor hillbilly's complete inability to attract any attention from either sex has driven them to the rather bizarre behavior of impersonating human creatures. They are doing this in the hope of attracting either reverend ted haggard or a priest with a tub of vaseline. What ever you do .. DO NOT BEND OVER IN FRONT OF THEM UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
It is also highly recommended that in the case of accidental contact you rinse yourself off with bleach and burn the clothes you were wearing. These creatures can most commonly found on the “TOPIX GUN FORUMS” in a soiled diaper having a conversations with themselves
Yet more drooled deviled spam.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2835 Dec 31, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
bwhahahhahahaha... think again stupa-$$.. how many generations of morons do you come from?
California’s law banning possession of a semi-automatic assault rifle is constitutional, according to a state appeals court that upheld the law Monday against a Second Amendment challenge. As the court’s opinion explains, the Supreme Court’s seminal Second Amendment opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller held that the right to bear arms is “‘not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose,’ but is instead the right to possess and carry weapons typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes such as hunting or self-defense.” Ownership of “[d]angerous and unusual weapons” is not protected by the Constitution.
Vaild U.S. Supreme Court decisions:

"...The Territory being a part of the United States, the Government and the citizen both enter it under the authority of the Constitution, with their respective rights defined and marked out; and the Federal Government [60 U.S. 393, 450] can exercise no power over his person or property, beyond what that instrument confers, nor lawfully deny any right which it has reserved.

"A reference to a few of the provisions of the Constitution will illustrate this proposition.

"For example, no one, we presume, will contend that Congress can make any law in a Territory respecting the establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people of the Territory peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for the redress of grievances.

"Nor can Congress deny to the people the right to keep and bear arms, nor the right to trial by jury, nor compel any one to be a witness against himself in a criminal proceeding.

"These powers, and others, in relation to rights of person, which it is not necessary here to enumerate, are, in express and positive terms, denied to the General Government; and the rights of private property have been guarded with equal care...."--Mr. Chief Justice TANEY, U.S. Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).

"The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress. This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government, leaving the people to look for their protection against any violation by their fellow citizens of the rights it recognizes, to what is called, in The City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 139, the "powers which relate to merely municipal legislation, or what was, perhaps, more properly called internal police," "not surrendered or restrained" by the Constitution of the United States."--U.S. Supreme Court, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."--Miranda vs. Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436, 491,(1966).

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2837 Dec 31, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
don't forget to swallow... don't want you killing all those live sperm.... bwhahhahahahahahha...your god doesn't like abortions... well, you are the exception.....
Yet more mindless drooling. Oh well, we won't be having to put up with the likes of you much longer.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News McRgo E'News: National Reciprocity & December C... 15 hr Jim Wildrick Jr 1
News Pelosi's claim the House GOP is 'inviting' viol... Thu Say What 8
News Florida: Another Mass Murder Stopped by Armed C... Dec 12 im not a doctor 9
News Lancaster County's congressmen vote opposite wa... Dec 11 jimwildrickjr 1
News Supreme Court turns away challenge to Md. assau... Dec 6 im not a doctor 6
News Florida Church Warns Visitors That Members Are ... Dec 5 im not a doctor 2
A Breakdown of Reloading at Home Nov 27 SummerBB8 1
More from around the web