Gabrielle Giffords to testify in support of Washington state background check bill

There are 20 comments on the Jan 27, 2014, KTAR story titled Gabrielle Giffords to testify in support of Washington state background check bill. In it, KTAR reports that:

Former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona will be in Olympia to testify in favor of an initiative to require universal background checks on all firearm sales in Washington state.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KTAR.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#77 Jan 31, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
It proves that you are an agenda-driven liar.
http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/stro...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#78 Jan 31, 2014
Luciferhasreturned wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
HOW MANY THOUSANDS OF SPAMS HAVE YOU POSTED FROM THE 1800'S?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!
BETCHA YOU WILL SEE THIS QUOTE AGAIN, KEATS!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
Wipe your chin, dear!
Lam and pathetic.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#79 Jan 31, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
U.S. Constitution, 2nd Article of Amendment, "Restrictive" clause:

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."

Trumps you and the treasonous courts.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#80 Jan 31, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
An agenda-driven liar for pointing out that a quote is manufactured? It's the people who manufacture and distort these quotes who are agenda-driven, surely.
NOT "manufactured, liar. NOTHING I quote is.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#81 Jan 31, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
NOT "manufactured, liar. NOTHING I quote is.
But I've just proven that it IS manufactured.
From the Jefferson site:
Status: This quotation has not been found in any of the writings of Thomas Jefferson. It is often seen preceded by the sentence, "No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms,"

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#82 Feb 1, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
But I've just proven that it IS manufactured.
From the Jefferson site:
Status: This quotation has not been found in any of the writings of Thomas Jefferson. It is often seen preceded by the sentence, "No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms,"
No, you inbred LIEberal. You proved that a quote from ANOTHER POSTER was "manufactured". And NOT ANY of the quotes that I have posted.

Take a hike, you agenda-driven LIAR.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#83 Feb 1, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you inbred LIEberal. You proved that a quote from ANOTHER POSTER was "manufactured". And NOT ANY of the quotes that I have posted.
Take a hike, you agenda-driven LIAR.
Dinesh posted this:
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" óThomas Jefferson,
----------

I replied:
"Jefferson never said that"

----------

You jumped in with:
" ....you are an agenda-driven liar".

----------

I replied:
"An agenda-driven liar for pointing out that a quote is manufactured? It's the people who manufacture and distort these quotes who are agenda-driven, surely"
http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/stro...

----------

You said:
"NOT "manufactured, liar. NOTHING I quote is".

----------

I replied:
"But I've just proven that it IS manufactured. From the Jefferson site:
Status: "This quotation has not been found in any of the writings of Thomas Jefferson. It is often seen preceded by the sentence, "No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms," "

----------

You said:
"You proved that a quote from ANOTHER POSTER was "manufactured". And NOT ANY of the quotes that I have posted."
==========
==========

At which point did I say that YOU posted it? I just said that Jefferson never said it.
Having said that, if you are GSOTNet, you have posted plenty of manufactured quotes in the past and continued to post them even after I provided the evidence that they were fake. I could find the thread and bring it to the top if you like?

.
Cat74

Aurora, IL

#84 Feb 1, 2014
Sorry, my Brit friend, you were wrong 200 or so years ago, and you are wrong now. Whatever gives you the idea you have a say in American issues? Go have a cup of tepid tea, and ponder what might have been had you not lost in 1776

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#85 Feb 1, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
Dinesh posted this:
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" óThomas Jefferson,
----------
I replied:
"Jefferson never said that"
----------
You jumped in with:
" ....you are an agenda-driven liar".
----------
I replied:
"An agenda-driven liar for pointing out that a quote is manufactured? It's the people who manufacture and distort these quotes who are agenda-driven, surely"
http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/stro...
----------
You said:
"NOT "manufactured, liar. NOTHING I quote is".
----------
I replied:
"But I've just proven that it IS manufactured. From the Jefferson site:
Status: "This quotation has not been found in any of the writings of Thomas Jefferson. It is often seen preceded by the sentence, "No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms," "
----------
You said:
"You proved that a quote from ANOTHER POSTER was "manufactured". And NOT ANY of the quotes that I have posted."
==========
==========
At which point did I say that YOU posted it? I just said that Jefferson never said it.
Having said that, if you are GSOTNet, you have posted plenty of manufactured quotes in the past and continued to post them even after I provided the evidence that they were fake. I could find the thread and bring it to the top if you like?
.
And you are outright LYING. EVERY SINGLE LAST QUOTE I'VE >EVER< PLACED ON TOPIX is referenced and sourced.

You have LOST the argument. So now you resort to trickery and OUTRIGHT LIES. How utterly PATHETIC of you,'bob'.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#86 Feb 1, 2014
Cat74 wrote:
Sorry, my Brit friend, you were wrong 200 or so years ago, and you are wrong now. Whatever gives you the idea you have a say in American issues? Go have a cup of tepid tea, and ponder what might have been had you not lost in 1776
HaHa! Good one!

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#88 Feb 1, 2014
Luciferhasreturned wrote:
<quoted text>
IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT YOU COME IN CONTACT WITH 2ndamright OR ANY OF HIS MANY ALIASES DO NOT BEND OVER IN FRONT OF HIM UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES . A panel of experts has recently determined that this poor INBREDíS complete inability to attract any attention from either sex has driven him to the rather bizarre behavior of impersonating Americans. He is doing this in the hope of attracting either reverend ted hagg.ard or a priest with a tub of vaseline, to which he hasnít been successful.
He has now resorted to trying to kornhole his own aliases. This creature can most commonly found on the TOPIX gun threads, erect, spinning around like a dog chasing itís tail, while trying to get at his own butt. It is also highly recommended that in the case of accidental contact you rinse yourself off with bleach and burn the clothes you were wearing
Isn't it time for your nap, mindless drone?

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#89 Feb 1, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
And you are outright LYING. EVERY SINGLE LAST QUOTE I'VE >EVER< PLACED ON TOPIX is referenced and sourced.
You have LOST the argument. So now you resort to trickery and OUTRIGHT LIES. How utterly PATHETIC of you,'bob'.
How can I have lost the argument if I've just shown the quote to be fake?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#90 Feb 1, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
How can I have lost the argument if I've just shown the quote to be fake?
Because you yourself are a FAKE, you bumbling British savant.
Common sense from London

Europe

#93 Feb 2, 2014
Such narrow minds...

Freedom of speech anyone? Got news for you:
Everyones entitled to express its opinion about everything on this planet you self egoistic overpatriot from Aurora, btw what a name...the irony for you trigger happy idiots.

I didnt say a word about 1776, you guys keep mentioning that and "we bailed you" etc. Delusions of grandeur as usual. Thankfully there are open minded Americans, this is coming from someone who spent unlimited years in Cali.

And just a reminder for those who dont read carefully:
I live in London but I wasnt born here, got it?

Im a John Lennon follower, a true human right supporter, a citizen of the world, proud to be human, thats how I feel, Im not some redneck unintellectual douche like Nugent who Im sure all of you here admire, good luck with that and your pro-nazi mentality.
Tray

Saltillo, MS

#94 Feb 2, 2014
Common sense from London wrote:
Such narrow minds...
Freedom of speech anyone? Got news for you:
Everyones entitled to express its opinion about everything on this planet you self egoistic overpatriot from Aurora, btw what a name...the irony for you trigger happy idiots.
I didnt say a word about 1776, you guys keep mentioning that and "we bailed you" etc. Delusions of grandeur as usual. Thankfully there are open minded Americans, this is coming from someone who spent unlimited years in Cali.
And just a reminder for those who dont read carefully:
I live in London but I wasnt born here, got it?
Im a John Lennon follower, a true human right supporter, a citizen of the world, proud to be human, thats how I feel, Im not some redneck unintellectual douche like Nugent who Im sure all of you here admire, good luck with that and your pro-nazi mentality.
Thereís simply no way of disputing this: the revered icon of peace and love had a serious problem with violence against women. This has been documented all the way back to his Liverpool days, and he eventually admitted it himself later in life. His first wife Cynthia and his second, Yoko Ono, were both victims of Lennonís brutality at one point or another, and given that most men who beat their spouses or girlfriends regularly are not particularly discriminating about the object of their violence, itís frankly impossible that they were the only ones. It seems clear in hindsight that the gentle icon the hippies worship was actually a man with very serious psychological problems who often flew into uncontrollable fits of rage which he took out on the women in his life.

Emotionally Abused His Son
Without question, the greatest victim of Lennonís character failings was his oldest son, Julian. Lennon clearly resented the young boy whose conception had forced him into a marriage he didnít want and trapped him in a domestic routine he was too immature and narcissistic to sustain. Both Julian and his mother Cynthia have publicly stated that Lennon was alternately absent, indifferent, drug-addled, and generally unpleasant to be around during Julianís early childhood. After he divorced Cynthia, Lennon took off with Yoko Ono and dropped out of his sonís life for years. After they reconnected, Lennon severely emotionally abused his son on several occasions, berating and screaming at him until the boy was reduced to tears. Once, Julian giggled and Lennon shouted back,ďI hate the way you fucking laugh!Ē Julian was not yet a teenager at the time. In perhaps the saddest statement ever made about Lennon, Julian later stated that Paul McCartney was more of a father to him than his real father was.
Pathological Liar
Politically Clueless
People tend to see Lennon as some sort of divine guru of peace and love because of his political activities in the early 1970s. The truth is that most of Lennonís reputation as a political activist is based on photos of him with various Ď60s radicals and his own press statements. He never actually did anything whatsoever of note in the political realm, and most of the radicals he cultivated thought he was an ignorant poseur. The few things he did actually do, like giving money and publicity to violent groups like the Black Panthers, are nothing to be proud of.
Cat74

Romeoville, IL

#96 Feb 2, 2014
John Lennon follower? That explains everything.
Tray

Saltillo, MS

#98 Feb 2, 2014
-2ndAmright wrote:
<quoted text>
more bull$-hit
Boo hoo hoo. Poor baby. Don't you just hate it when your hero and life are exposed to be false. Lennon was nothing more than a drug head, wife and child abusing, pervert. Your other pick living in public housing drawing a public check (Obama) is just as much a failure of humanity. Another pick was Trayvon the thug. Yet again you pick a sorry excuse for a human to look up to. You couldn't pick a winner in a one horse race. WOW if I was you I might want to slap that thing you call a momma for making such a failure. Was you a crack baby? Maybe you are just a result of her failed abortion. Failure runs in your family. Maybe she should try for a really late late late term abortion.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#99 Feb 2, 2014
-2ndAmright wrote:
<quoted text>
2ndamrightard is exercising his right to be stupid... it is in the bill of rights...
John Kerry and the Right to be Stupid
Our new Secretary of State, John Kerry, thinks that the right to be stupid is part of the Bill of Rights.
Just as lame the hundredth time you posted it was as the first time. Don't you need to get ready for your "special education" classes tomorrow, child?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#100 Feb 2, 2014
Common sense from London wrote:
Such narrow minds...
Freedom of speech anyone? Got news for you:
Everyones entitled to express its opinion about everything on this planet you self egoistic overpatriot from Aurora, btw what a name...the irony for you trigger happy idiots.
I didnt say a word about 1776, you guys keep mentioning that and "we bailed you" etc. Delusions of grandeur as usual. Thankfully there are open minded Americans, this is coming from someone who spent unlimited years in Cali.
And just a reminder for those who dont read carefully:
I live in London but I wasnt born here, got it?
Im a John Lennon follower, a true human right supporter, a citizen of the world, proud to be human, thats how I feel, Im not some redneck unintellectual douche like Nugent who Im sure all of you here admire, good luck with that and your pro-nazi mentality.
Fluuuuuuuuuuuussssshhhhhh. That ought to get rid of the stench....

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#101 Feb 2, 2014
Tray wrote:
<quoted text>Thereís simply no way of disputing this: the revered icon of peace and love had a serious problem with violence against women. This has been documented all the way back to his Liverpool days, and he eventually admitted it himself later in life. His first wife Cynthia and his second, Yoko Ono, were both victims of Lennonís brutality at one point or another, and given that most men who beat their spouses or girlfriends regularly are not particularly discriminating about the object of their violence, itís frankly impossible that they were the only ones. It seems clear in hindsight that the gentle icon the hippies worship was actually a man with very serious psychological problems who often flew into uncontrollable fits of rage which he took out on the women in his life.
Emotionally Abused His Son
Without question, the greatest victim of Lennonís character failings was his oldest son, Julian. Lennon clearly resented the young boy whose conception had forced him into a marriage he didnít want and trapped him in a domestic routine he was too immature and narcissistic to sustain. Both Julian and his mother Cynthia have publicly stated that Lennon was alternately absent, indifferent, drug-addled, and generally unpleasant to be around during Julianís early childhood. After he divorced Cynthia, Lennon took off with Yoko Ono and dropped out of his sonís life for years. After they reconnected, Lennon severely emotionally abused his son on several occasions, berating and screaming at him until the boy was reduced to tears. Once, Julian giggled and Lennon shouted back,ďI hate the way you fucking laugh!Ē Julian was not yet a teenager at the time. In perhaps the saddest statement ever made about Lennon, Julian later stated that Paul McCartney was more of a father to him than his real father was.
Pathological Liar
Politically Clueless
People tend to see Lennon as some sort of divine guru of peace and love because of his political activities in the early 1970s. The truth is that most of Lennonís reputation as a political activist is based on photos of him with various Ď60s radicals and his own press statements. He never actually did anything whatsoever of note in the political realm, and most of the radicals he cultivated thought he was an ignorant poseur. The few things he did actually do, like giving money and publicity to violent groups like the Black Panthers, are nothing to be proud of.
Not to mention that John brought Yoko into his home right in front of his wife and children. The guy was a real vile p.o.s.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sheriff, lawyer dispute whether 73-year-old dep... 1 hr Truth and Facts 43
Democrats: Get A $2,000 Tax Credit For Turning ... Apr 20 Truth and Facts 13
Kahr CW40 PROBLEM (Dec '08) Apr 17 OlFed 48
News Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) Apr 15 AMERICA 12,178
News Local Jews upset by Holocaust references in cam... (Jun '12) Apr 13 swedenforever 112
News Who's calling the shots in Canada? Apr 10 Truth and Facts 2
Suspect in Arizona Shooting Spree a White Supre... Apr 5 Truth and Facts 82
More from around the web