U.S. Supreme Court Asked To Consider ...

U.S. Supreme Court Asked To Consider New Jersey Right To Carry Case

There are 30 comments on the AmmoLand story from Jan 10, 2014, titled U.S. Supreme Court Asked To Consider New Jersey Right To Carry Case. In it, AmmoLand reports that:

The Second Amendment Foundation and Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs today asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the appeal in the challenge to New Jersey's unconstitutional carry laws.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at AmmoLand.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#22 Jan 21, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
So this guy was right in his commentary several decades later but Thomas Jefferson was wrong?
It wasn't "several decades later", traitor-troll:

William Rawle, A View of the Constitution, 125-6 (2nd ed. 1829).(>>>>>App ointed by President George Washington as U.S. District Attorney<<<<< for Pennsylvania in 1791).

You do know what 2nd EDITION means, RIGHT?

Take a hike, traitor.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#23 Jan 21, 2014
2ndAmrght wrote:
<quoted text>
the Constitution is only a general guide and subject to interpretation depending on the times and political climate. That's why we have a supreme court and legislatures. Hillbilly's can shoot themselves up in the back woods all they want. No one gives a rats a-$$.
Scalia: Constitution is not a living document

NEW ROCHELLE, N.Y.– U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that the Constitution is not a living document and should not be rewritten each year by the unelected justices of the Supreme Court.

Justice Scalia delivered an address titled “On Interpreting the Constitution” at Iona College in New Rochelle, where he is the Jack Rudin and John G. Driscoll distinguished visiting professor for the spring semester. The Jan. 23 lecture was attended by 700 students, faculty and alumni, as well as officials from New Rochelle and Westchester County....

- catholicreview.org

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#24 Jan 21, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't "several decades later".....
It doesn't matter, it's just a commentary. Why is it that your best sources are commentaries written after ratification rather than from the actual ratification debates?

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#25 Jan 21, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that the Constitution is not a living document and should not be rewritten each year by the unelected justices of the Supreme Court.
But it was ok for him to do exactly that with the Second Amendment?
Stud Muffin

London, UK

#26 Jan 21, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't matter, it's just a commentary. Why is it that your best sources are commentaries written after ratification rather than from the actual ratification debates?
You really are an ignoramus, aren't you?
Those who attended the debates knew that the right to arms was a forgone conclusion, and therefor required no debate.

Have you always been this stupid?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#27 Jan 21, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't matter, it's just a commentary. Why is it that your best sources are commentaries written after ratification rather than from the actual ratification debates?
What part of PREEXISTING Natural Right do you NOT understand? And it was RATIFIED under those impressions.

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that ORIGINAL RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE which is PARAMOUNT to ALL positive forms of government ... The CITIZENS must rush tumultuously to ARMS...."-- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist #28, Dec. 26, 1787.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#28 Jan 21, 2014
Bob2bob too wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't matter, it's just a commentary. Why is it that your best sources are commentaries written after ratification rather than from the actual ratification debates?
Here traitor-troll, "comment" on THIS:

"...Look at the great volume of human nature. They will foretell you that a defenceless country cannot be secure. The nature of man forbids us to conclude that we are in no danger from war, The passions of men stimulate them to avail themselves of the weakness of others."-- John Marshall, June 10, 1788, The Debates in the Several State Conventions,(Virginia), on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution.[Elliot's Debates, Volume 3].(Mr. Marshall joined the Culpeper Minutemen and was appointed as a lieutenant. He later attained the rank of captain. Mr. Marshall was also the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, serving from February 4, 1801 until his death).

Mr. Marshall later stated;

"Also, the conditions and circumstances of the period require a finding that while the stated purpose of the right to arms was to secure a well-regulated militia, the right to self-defense was assumed by the Framers."

- John Marshall,[As quoted in Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 251 (1846); State v. Dawson, 272 N.C. 535, 159 S.E.2d 1, 9 (1968).]

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#30 Jan 21, 2014
2ndAmrght wrote:
<>
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
HOW MANY THOUSANDS OF SPAMS HAVE YOU POSTED FROM THE 1800'S?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!
BETCHA YOU WILL SEE THIS QUOTE AGAIN, KEATS!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
Wipe your chin, dear!
bobtobob2 wrote:
<>
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
HOW MANY THOUSANDS OF SPAMS HAVE YOU POSTED FROM THE 1800'S?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!
BETCHA YOU WILL SEE THIS QUOTE AGAIN, KEATS!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
Wipe your chin, dear!
satanzhit wrote:
<>
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
HOW MANY THOUSANDS OF SPAMS HAVE YOU POSTED FROM THE 1800'S?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!
BETCHA YOU WILL SEE THIS QUOTE AGAIN, KEATS!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
Wipe your chin, dear!
Treason freak !

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#31 Jan 21, 2014
2ndAmrght wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
HOW MANY THOUSANDS OF SPAMS HAVE YOU POSTED FROM THE 1800'S?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!
BETCHA YOU WILL SEE THIS QUOTE AGAIN, KEATS!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
Wipe your chin, dear!
Yet more mindless and meaningless regurgitated drool.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#33 Jan 21, 2014
2ndAmrght wrote:
<quoted text>
re-tard freak
Yeah, that's you alright.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 2 hr barefoot2626 1,513
News Democrats to push for universal background chec... 4 hr Marauder 2
News Melania Trump will address immigration controve... Tue JohnInLa 234
News George Soros, Other Democratic Megadonors Plowi... Aug 21 Heath Ledger Suic... 2
News New Dating Site Aims to Pair Concealed Carry Si... Aug 21 RobertM 1
News Psychiatrists Reminded To Refrain From Armchair... Aug 20 lorr d 4
News In Several States, Trump's Poll Monitors May Be... Aug 17 Marauder 9
More from around the web