'Conceal and carry' in Illinois not d...

'Conceal and carry' in Illinois not done deal, as SCOTUS could put on the brakes

There are 2 comments on the Examiner.com story from May 5, 2013, titled 'Conceal and carry' in Illinois not done deal, as SCOTUS could put on the brakes. In it, Examiner.com reports that:

The United States Supreme Court on Friday granted the Attorney General of Illinois, Lisa Madigan, a 30-day extension to "file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 23, 2013 to June 24, 2013" in regards to " conceal and carry " in Illinois.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Examiner.com.

Unimpressed Pragmatist

Antioch, CA

#1 May 5, 2013
The many issues being raised, pro and con, on what the Second amendment means must, very soon, be resolved by the SCOTUS. Otherwise, will have a patchwork of state laws on who and where guns may be carried or held by We the People. Widespread confusion on this major right under the Bill of rights cannot be permitted to continue if we are to be a nation of laws that all are required to honor and follow.

The reluctance of the SCOTUS to make a final and all encompassing ruling on the issue of gun rights is a reflection of the liberal mindset of certain members of the Court to deny the rights of We the People to self-determination and freedom of choice that was the objective of the Founders of our great and free nation. Most of all the arguments, presented over the years by the liberal faction of our societ,y to greatly restrict and control gun ownership is indictitive of their belief in huge and intrusive government that controls every aspect of our lives. They must not be allowed to inflect the will of the minority (approx. 21% of our citizenry) over the vast majority of the citizens of the United States of America.

The Second Amendment is proof that the Founders realized the inherent tendency of government to devolve into tyranny and that the pro big government faction would always be pushing for minority rule under an all intrusive government in which these liberals would function as the human element of government. Possession of arms by We the people will act as a preventive measure over government tyranny. As Thomas Jefferson advised us:“When the people fear their government there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
more

Huntsville, AL

#2 May 5, 2013
Unimpressed Pragmatist wrote:
The Second Amendment is proof that the Founders realized the inherent tendency of government to devolve into tyranny
BS they were worried about the British and defending the new nation without a large standing army.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Hillary Clinton wavers on Second Amendment righ... 3 hr WasteWater 1,574
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 3 hr WasteWater 1,125
News Legislators criticize Healey's assault weapons ... 3 hr Get Out 6
News A Powerful and Pragmatic Approach to Criminal J... 5 hr Enough Already 1
News Pam Frampton: America: shot through the heart, ... 12 hr Watchdog 1
News Letter: Second Amendment should be abolished Jul 23 Prep-for-Dep 6
News AG Healey's assault weapons order is an overdue... Jul 23 Get Out 3
More from around the web