Proposal Would Take Guns From Residen...

Proposal Would Take Guns From Residents With DUI Convictions

There are 6 comments on the Patch.com story from Feb 28, 2013, titled Proposal Would Take Guns From Residents With DUI Convictions. In it, Patch.com reports that:

If you've been convicted of a DWI or DUI in the past five years, then Governor Dannel P. Malloy doesn't think you should own a firearm.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Patch.com.

“Pompous pontificator”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#1 Feb 28, 2013
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.

THIS is why gun owners and all other freedom-minded Americans must act when a totalitarian government acts on our citizens with insidious, incremental attacks. First retroactive confiscation of a few, then..........

Since: Nov 09

Newnan, GA

#2 Feb 28, 2013
This left wing dirt bag wants to make it so that having a DUI prevents someone from exercising a constitutioal right. Meanwhile they will allow you to own a car and drive again which is only a privelege.Liberals really are twisted. The people of CT get what they deserve

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#3 Mar 1, 2013
Then if woman or black should get a DUI and they don't like to own guns, they should lose their right to vote, instead.
Get Out

Jacksonville, NC

#4 Mar 2, 2013
Why don’t they take it to the next level of dumb? If you bounce a check, lose your job, receive welfare, receive food stamps, if you’re subsidized by the government for anything, jaywalkers, get a fix it ticket on your car just to name a few.
don russell

Oklahoma City, OK

#5 Mar 2, 2013
well, dui SHOULD get legs and arms broken, for reckless, no goldarned reason endangerment of everyone around them, the arrogant, selfish pieces of work. Why cant they stay HOME and do their damned drinking?

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#6 Mar 3, 2013
don russell wrote:
well, dui SHOULD get legs and arms broken, for reckless, no goldarned reason endangerment of everyone around them, the arrogant, selfish pieces of work. Why cant they stay HOME and do their damned drinking?
LOL, a person doesn't need to be drunk to get a DUI, for starters. As far as drinking at home, I agree...which means you the tax payer should make up for all the lost income taxes, sales taxes, liquor license taxes and gas taxes, from those that will lost when the feds and state government doesn't get that money from people who go to places of business that serve alcohol. LOL!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Jesus and the Second Amendment 15 hr FormerParatrooper 5
News Bristol Palin is engaged (May '15) 18 hr Three Rounds 67
News Assault weapon bans should stand Fri okimar 884
News Hillary to Voter Calling for More Second Amendm... Fri Justice Leaguer 2
News Federal Judge Strikes Down DC Concealed Carry Law Thu Prep-for-Dep 4
News Facebook Spends $16 Million on Armed Guards for... May 26 okimar 3
News It's just a bill May 25 Justice Leaguer 2
More from around the web