Senate panel to vote on assault weapons ban

Mar 12, 2013 Full story: USA Today 821

A Senate panel is likely to approve a ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, but the measure faces opposition from Republicans and Democrats.

Full Story
CBOW

Dover, PA

#279 Mar 26, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Seconded.
You know, one of my favorite sayings when referring to libtards such as the "Professor" {snicker} here, was to say that they are dumber than a bag of hammers. But you know what, even hammers serve a purpose. This idiot is dumber than dog shit.
LOL, even dog shit has a purpose as fertilizer....oooh wait, so could the professor.......
CBOW

Dover, PA

#280 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Vote yourself out, whiny Rightie bitch with no argument.
No argument, well, that would be you fool. Your party failed to complete their mission of disarmament; too bad, so sad. hahahah. Let freedom ring!!!!

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#281 Mar 26, 2013
Cat74 wrote:
Sorry even a moron like you should be able to read the 2nd amendment and understand what it means. The Supreme Court has no problem interpreting it, and they are the highest law in the land. You can't even get Horrible Harry to do your bidding. He will not go against the NRA. Neither will the Supreme Court. I love watching the liberals do their useless kabuki dance. At least while they are wasting their time they can't be making any more wars.
Hope you love more mass shootings and more dead kids, too. Too bad you can't blame those on eeebullll liberals, huh?

Well, you'll TRY, but we'll just laugh.

Mass murder isn't funny, though, and you're enabling it. Remember that, you evil Rightie hag.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#282 Mar 26, 2013
Patriot wrote:
<quoted text>
Professor? They could have arrested David anytime they wanted while he was in town. This was nothing more than grandstanding, and you obviously approve of communistic maneuvers like this. Innocent women and children, then again you probably approved of Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler.
Even you should know it wasn't just a matter of arresting him, but investigating the presence of an arms cache at his "religious" compound. He was a criminal wacko, his people attacked government agents, and he and his people fired the compound, committing mass murder.

You prefer to lie and make stupidly false accusations. Were you a buddy of Jim Jones, too? Did you enjoy the news of the death of his cult in the jungle? I'm sure you were disappointed you couldn't blame it on the U.S. government.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#283 Mar 26, 2013
Well wrote:
<quoted text>
Fine. Repeal the 2nd. I will keep my firearms under the 9th and 10th.
When new gun laws are passed, you will OBEY them or go to jail, chump.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#284 Mar 26, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
No argument, well, that would be you fool. Your party failed to complete their mission of disarmament; too bad, so sad. hahahah. Let freedom ring!!!!
Childish response, typical of an under-educated gunner and rightie.

I have no "party," I only vote Dem because the GOPee is so damned putrid and fascistic. And of course there was no attempt at "disarmament," just another NRA-sponsored bit of paranoia on your part.

You think freedom = guns....which makes you truly stupid.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#285 Mar 26, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, even dog shit has a purpose as fertilizer....oooh wait, so could the professor.......
Another implied threat of violence, typical of the nuts on the gunner side of the aisle. Fortunately, most of them are like you - keyboard cowards who would be too busy wetting their pants during a robbery to pull that gun and use it.

Wimps! LOL
CBOW

Dover, PA

#286 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Childish response, typical of an under-educated gunner and rightie.
I have no "party," I only vote Dem because the GOPee is so damned putrid and fascistic. And of course there was no attempt at "disarmament," just another NRA-sponsored bit of paranoia on your part.
You think freedom = guns....which makes you truly stupid.
Freedom is the right to choose. No attempt at disarmament? The why was protection from the gun grabbers added to Obamacare? So clueless. Keep whining libturd, it's over.
CBOW

Dover, PA

#287 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Another implied threat of violence, typical of the nuts on the gunner side of the aisle. Fortunately, most of them are like you - keyboard cowards who would be too busy wetting their pants during a robbery to pull that gun and use it.
Wimps! LOL
You could stop by and find out.....Now go take your Paxil like a good little libturd.
Trust Not the Left

Genoa, IL

#288 Mar 26, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Freedom is the right to choose. No attempt at disarmament? The why was protection from the gun grabbers added to Obamacare? So clueless. Keep whining libturd, it's over.
We don't need guns and We don't need a right to choose. Just call 911 in an emergency.
The trained professionals will be there to write the report(true or false).

Training means everything, Check these links:

http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Officer-Tim-Da...

http://www.kwwl.com/story/18704429/teen-convi...

http://www.kcrg.com/news/crime/Teen-Put-On-Pr...

http://d3811613.v438.spirevps.com/the-blotter...
Trust Not the Left

Genoa, IL

#289 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
You think freedom = guns....which makes you truly stupid.
In some cases Guns certainly do play a role in protecting freedom.
One should not be so irresponsible that he places his life and freedom in the hands of others.
There is a valid reason for the second amendment and it should not in anyway be infringed upon.

If you are in favor of tightening regulations on the 2nd, then should be in favor of limiting the 1st, by requiring all speech to be true.

Trust Not the Left

Genoa, IL

#290 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Another implied threat of violence, typical of the nuts on the gunner side of the aisle. Fortunately, most of them are like you - keyboard cowards who would be too busy wetting their pants during a robbery to pull that gun and use it.
Wimps! LOL
There is some truth to what you say here. In that case the coward has the freedom to choose not to own a firearm and dial 911 if they should ever feel the need.

He could also choose to scream "HELP" in hopes that a conservative neighbor might come to his aide.
CBOW

Dover, PA

#291 Mar 26, 2013
Trust Not the Left wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't need guns and We don't need a right to choose. Just call 911 in an emergency.
The trained professionals will be there to write the report(true or false).
Training means everything, Check these links:
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Officer-Tim-Da...
http://www.kwwl.com/story/18704429/teen-convi...
http://www.kcrg.com/news/crime/Teen-Put-On-Pr...
http://d3811613.v438.spirevps.com/the-blotter...
Exactly, the trained professionals never arrive in a timely fashion. They have even told us to always maintain a form of self defense. Must be why guns are so popular with rational thinkers.
Ever hear the one about the trucker and the cop?
A cop pulls a trucker over. The cop asks for license and registration. The trucker tells the cop, "I have a .38 under my seat, I also have a .45 in the glove box as well as a rifle behind the seat." The cop says" what are you afraid of?" the trucker says "NOT A DAMN THING!"

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#292 Mar 26, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
You could stop by and find out.....Now go take your Paxil like a good little libturd.
I don't visit gay brothels, sorry....:)
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Freedom is the right to choose. No attempt at disarmament? The why was protection from the gun grabbers added to Obamacare? So clueless. Keep whining libturd, it's over.
WTF does gun regulation have to do with Obamacare, you paranoid freak? Is your Obama Derangement Syndrome spiralling out of control, or what?

NO ONE IS DISARMING America. Only things being talked about were some more regulations and possibly a ban on a certain military-type of rifle...not even all RIFLES.

What's "over" is the part of your life when you were sane, if there ever WAS such a time...:)

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#293 Mar 26, 2013
Trust Not the Left wrote:
<quoted text>
In some cases Guns certainly do play a role in protecting freedom.
One should not be so irresponsible that he places his life and freedom in the hands of others.
There is a valid reason for the second amendment and it should not in anyway be infringed upon.
If you are in favor of tightening regulations on the 2nd, then should be in favor of limiting the 1st, by requiring all speech to be true.
Guns may at times play a role in protecting our PERSONAL freedom...not the same things as guns EQUALLING freedom, as you 2nd Amendment worshippers like to pretend.

I repeat that the 2nd Amendment should be REPEALED as being out-of-date, and new gun regulations should take its place. There is no place in the modern world for unlimited gun ownership for everyone.

I don't favor any changes in the 1st Amendment. In fact it's usually gunners and righties who want to suppress freedom of speech.
CBOW

Dover, PA

#294 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't visit gay brothels, sorry....:)
<quoted text>
WTF does gun regulation have to do with Obamacare, you paranoid freak? Is your Obama Derangement Syndrome spiralling out of control, or what?
NO ONE IS DISARMING America. Only things being talked about were some more regulations and possibly a ban on a certain military-type of rifle...not even all RIFLES.
What's "over" is the part of your life when you were sane, if there ever WAS such a time...:)
For these reasons, the following language did, indeed, become a part of the nation’s controversial health care reform law: How's that for defending the 2nd amendment?

(c) PROTECTION OF SECOND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS.—

‘‘(1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS.— A wellness and health promotion activity implemented under subsection (a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any information relating to—

‘‘(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully- possessed firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property of an individual; or

‘‘(B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm or ammunition by an individual.&#8232;‘‘

(2) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION.—None of the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used for the collection of any in- formation relating to—

‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition;

‘‘(B) the lawful use of a firearm or ammunition; or

‘‘(C) the lawful storage of a firearm or ammunition.

‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON DATABASES OR DATA BANKS.—None of the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used to maintain records of individual ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition. Read it and weep, libturd!!!!!

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#295 Mar 26, 2013
Trust Not the Left wrote:
<quoted text>
There is some truth to what you say here. In that case the coward has the freedom to choose not to own a firearm and dial 911 if they should ever feel the need.
He could also choose to scream "HELP" in hopes that a conservative neighbor might come to his aide.
I'd rather die than depend on a Conservative for anything. And of course in reality, I'd probably be in FAR greater danger from my gun-nut Con neighbor than from any criminals in the neighborhood.
CBOW

Dover, PA

#296 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd rather die than depend on a Conservative for anything. And of course in reality, I'd probably be in FAR greater danger from my gun-nut Con neighbor than from any criminals in the neighborhood.
You probably will die if your little world you have created for yourself even experiences a hiccup. Incapable of self defense or food providing.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#297 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd rather die than depend on a Conservative for anything. And of course in reality, I'd probably be in FAR greater danger from my gun-nut Con neighbor than from any criminals in the neighborhood.
Spoken like a true hoplophobe.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#298 Mar 26, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd rather die than depend on a Conservative for anything. And of course in reality, I'd probably be in FAR greater danger from my gun-nut Con neighbor than from any criminals in the neighborhood.
Do yourself a favor then. If you should ever find yourself in danger or need of assistance....DON'T dial 9-1-1. Why? Because some nice guys CARRYING GUNS are going to show up and try to help you, and we wouldn't want you pissing your little panties and getting all embarrassed.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sharyl Attkisson: Docs indicate ATF was using F... 1 hr Zzznorch 2
Shoot Down the Stupid Second Amendment 1 hr Zzznorch 11
Eleanor Roosevelt Had a Carry Permit, So Why Ca... 3 hr Here Is One 1
National View: Shoot down the stupid Second Ame... 8 hr Squach 3
Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) 8 hr Squach 12,136
An Individual Right Rekindled Sat Marauder 1
Ferguson braces for grand jury decision Fri Michael S 16
More from around the web