Senate panel to vote on assault weapons ban

Mar 12, 2013 Full story: USA Today 821

A Senate panel is likely to approve a ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, but the measure faces opposition from Republicans and Democrats.

Full Story
Anonymous

Brighton, MI

#259 Mar 25, 2013
Saying murder rates will decrease by banning assault weapons is like saying arson rates will drop by banning zippo lighters, I see no reason limiting anything to the law abiding general public but instead have tougher laws on criminals. Florida is an example, have a gun on you while u commit a crime, 10 extra years in prison, show that gun during the crime u committed, that's an extra 20 years in prison, shoot that gun in the crime u committed, automatic life in prison, and I believe Florida crime rates are on of the lowest per capita in the US

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#260 Mar 25, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>BS, How much of the Federalist Papers have you read? The reason for the Second Amendment is to protect the First. Also to protect from the Government. Thank goodness we don't answer to you, or take what you say at face value...
I'm sorry - the Federalist Papers are the law of the land, are they? They're what our laws and system of government are based on, are they?

You don't know s--t about the First Amendment OR the Founders.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#261 Mar 25, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Not the entire base, you f-ing moron. But that processing center was. The only people allowed to carry there were base police. The soldiers are NOT armed 24-7 while on post, idiot. Spout off some more shit about stuff you don't know. It is quite comical.
Ah...so there were armed police. It wasn't a gun-free area at all.

Thanks.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#262 Mar 25, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry, but why did we fight the Revolutionary War??? Oh yeah, to throw out the tyrannical government that was controlling us through non-represented taxation, and then tried to disarm us in Lexington and Concord. You need to go take a remedial history class, moron.
Irrelevant. Try to stay on-topic, assclown. The topic is early AMERICAN government and the Constitution.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#263 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry - the Federalist Papers are the law of the land, are they? They're what our laws and system of government are based on, are they?
You don't know s--t about the First Amendment OR the Founders.
Gee Whiz, Little Boy, your reading comprehension leave you wide open to scrutiny? Give it up,
I never said, little boy, that the Federalist Papers were the law of the land. They are an explanation of the The Constitution of the United States. For a 16 year old, you are slow... Pick it up Little Boy.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#264 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Irrelevant. Try to stay on-topic, assclown. The topic is early AMERICAN government and the Constitution.
The topic of your post was the reason for the 2nd Amendment, asshat. You don't even know the topic of your own post? Pathetic libturd.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#265 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah...so there were armed police. It wasn't a gun-free area at all.
Thanks.
You still have your head planted squarely up your ass don't you. Gun-free except for civilian base police and military police (just like most college campuses, only cops are allowed to be armed). They were called and responded. What a f**k-up you are.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#266 Mar 25, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Gee Whiz, Little Boy, your reading comprehension leave you wide open to scrutiny? Give it up,
I never said, little boy, that the Federalist Papers were the law of the land. They are an explanation of the The Constitution of the United States. For a 16 year old, you are slow... Pick it up Little Boy.
An "explanation of the Constitution?" You wish. But evidently you're willing to use them to "explain" certain aspects of the Constitution when the explanations supports your ridiculous, outdated positions on Constitutional issues.

The 2nd Amendment should be repealed. I don't give a flying f--k what the Founders think of it. They're long dead and the amendment has outlived its usefulness - to say the least.

Deal..

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#267 Mar 25, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
The topic of your post was the reason for the 2nd Amendment, asshat. You don't even know the topic of your own post? Pathetic libturd.
LOL...typical thuggish rightie, trying to dictate the terms of the discussion and tell everyone else what their own thoughts and subjects of debate are.

I repeat, you are offtopic. I was not discussiong pre-Revolutionary America, dumbass.

Now wake the f--k up, or STFU.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#268 Mar 25, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
You still have your head planted squarely up your ass don't you. Gun-free except for civilian base police and military police (just like most college campuses, only cops are allowed to be armed). They were called and responded. What a f**k-up you are.
Completely "gun free" except for the people with guns....gotcha.

ROTFLMAO!!
CBOW

Dover, PA

#269 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
An "explanation of the Constitution?" You wish. But evidently you're willing to use them to "explain" certain aspects of the Constitution when the explanations supports your ridiculous, outdated positions on Constitutional issues.
The 2nd Amendment should be repealed. I don't give a flying f--k what the Founders think of it. They're long dead and the amendment has outlived its usefulness - to say the least.
Deal..
Commie Pinko Traitor=professor. I vote you be repealed.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#270 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
An "explanation of the Constitution?" You wish. But evidently you're willing to use them to "explain" certain aspects of the Constitution when the explanations supports your ridiculous, outdated positions on Constitutional issues.
The 2nd Amendment should be repealed. I don't give a flying f--k what the Founders think of it. They're long dead and the amendment has outlived its usefulness - to say the least.
Deal..
That's why you use 16 yr. old logic and reasoning. That's why you use the language you do. Because you can't explain your reasoning with a civil tongue.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#271 Mar 25, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Commie Pinko Traitor=professor. I vote you be repealed.
Vote yourself out, whiny Rightie bitch with no argument.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#272 Mar 25, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Commie Pinko Traitor=professor. I vote you be repealed.
Seconded.

You know, one of my favorite sayings when referring to libtards such as the "Professor" {snicker} here, was to say that they are dumber than a bag of hammers. But you know what, even hammers serve a purpose. This idiot is dumber than dog shit.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

#273 Mar 25, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Seconded.
You know, one of my favorite sayings when referring to libtards such as the "Professor" {snicker} here, was to say that they are dumber than a bag of hammers. But you know what, even hammers serve a purpose. This idiot is dumber than dog shit.
Most likely you just project your stupidity onto others in order to comfort yourself.

Nutball raving Righties have to make violent attacks, they can't think or reason at all. Stupidity is a kind of violent mind-state, probably arising out of your confusion, right?:)
Cat74

Mchenry, IL

#274 Mar 25, 2013
Sorry even a moron like you should be able to read the 2nd amendment and understand what it means. The Supreme Court has no problem interpreting it, and they are the highest law in the land. You can't even get Horrible Harry to do your bidding. He will not go against the NRA. Neither will the Supreme Court. I love watching the liberals do their useless kabuki dance. At least while they are wasting their time they can't be making any more wars.
Patriot

Herndon, VA

#275 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean Waco and Ruby Ridge? So distractions are supposed to be your answer to my request?
Lame even by YOUR standards. The government LOST a lot of people at Waco, for instance, the cultists were the aggressors and set fire to the damn compound. Do you lie compulsively, or for pleasure?
Professor? They could have arrested David anytime they wanted while he was in town. This was nothing more than grandstanding, and you obviously approve of communistic maneuvers like this. Innocent women and children, then again you probably approved of Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler.
Patriot

Herndon, VA

#276 Mar 25, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>That's why you use 16 yr. old logic and reasoning. That's why you use the language you do. Because you can't explain your reasoning with a civil tongue.
Should probably repeal your right to speak.
Well

York, PA

#277 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
An "explanation of the Constitution?" You wish. But evidently you're willing to use them to "explain" certain aspects of the Constitution when the explanations supports your ridiculous, outdated positions on Constitutional issues.
The 2nd Amendment should be repealed. I don't give a flying f--k what the Founders think of it. They're long dead and the amendment has outlived its usefulness - to say the least.
Deal..
Fine. Repeal the 2nd. I will keep my firearms under the 9th and 10th.
Cat74

Mchenry, IL

#278 Mar 25, 2013
The Liberals don't have the votes for a Constitutional amendment. If they ever do take away the 2nd amendment we cannot protect the other amendments. They know the second amendment is safe. It is all blowing smoke for their losing cause. They are really pathetic. It is interesting to watch them twist in the wind.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Opinion Line 1 hr Bubbletoes 27
Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) 4 hr Captain Yesterday 10,763
3 year old shoots AR and survives 6 hr Tory II 4
30-06 (7.62X63) vs .308 (7.62X51) (Feb '11) 6 hr Tory II 96
Chicago Liberals Outlaw the Firearm Industry 6 hr Tory II 1
Cops Says Use RAID on Intruder 10 hr Tory II 1
Moms Demand Action Calls On Kroger Family Of St... Sun Halftone175 8
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Guns People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••