Bundy vs U.S.
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#34 May 2, 2014
Independent wrote:
You are either being obtuse, or are extremely stupid.
LMAO!

Obtuse - mentally slow, dim, dense
Stupid - mentally dull, simple, dim

Yes, it must be one or the other. Since they mean totally different things.

LOL!
Independent

United States

#35 May 2, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
You pull one sentence out of the thought and claim that's what I was saying. That's distortion.
You distort what I say then blame me for the distortion. That's the desperate game of a loser who can't make his case on the facts.
Dude, you're whacked.
I refuted one sentence....claim.....statemen t......you made, and you try to weasel out by stating I am distorting your words?

Uh, Dan.....I am not claiming you said it, I am directly quoting your words.
No need to "claim" what is there in black and white for the world to see.

http://www.topix.com/forum/guns/TA78OBQK2KQI4...

So, Dan, what does "There was no SWAT team." actually mean in Danspeak?

How have I distorted your words? I have used a direct quote from what you said. Since I have changed not one word or punctuation mark there is no distortion.

Can't read your "thoughts," Dan.
So I am left to refute what you put into words.

:^`P

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#37 May 2, 2014
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude, you're whacked.
I refuted one sentence....claim.....statemen t......you made, and you try to weasel out by stating I am distorting your words?
Uh, Dan.....I am not claiming you said it, I am directly quoting your words.
No need to "claim" what is there in black and white for the world to see.
http://www.topix.com/forum/guns/TA78OBQK2KQI4...
So, Dan, what does "There was no SWAT team." actually mean in Danspeak?
How have I distorted your words? I have used a direct quote from what you said. Since I have changed not one word or punctuation mark there is no distortion.
Can't read your "thoughts," Dan.
So I am left to refute what you put into words.
:^`P
*sigh*

I plainly said that BLS doesn't have a SWAT team. You know that's what I said. Pulling one sentence out of the paragraph to distort my plain meaning is a distortion and is dishonest.

I can explain it to you, but I can't comprehend it for you.

Get back to me when you can debate like an adult.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#38 May 2, 2014
Diamond Jim wrote:
<quoted text>Dan can't think or do for himself so he lets the government do all of that for him. He thinks everyone should be as dependent on the government the way he is.
He hates America now because there are too many free-thinking people that haven't fallen in line with his group think mentality.
Dan has been such a wretched failure in his life that the best he can do is try to spread his misery in the form of public policy ideas.
Do I know you?

You come making personal attacks as if we have a history. What name do you usually use here?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#39 May 2, 2014
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude, you're whacked.
I refuted one sentence....claim.....statemen t......you made, and you try to weasel out by stating I am distorting your words?
You are either lying or not telling the truth. I don't know if you're always wrong because of your embarrassingly low intelligence or your shamefully weak IQ. I don't know whether to mock you or just make fun of you.

LMAO!
Independent

United States

#40 May 2, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
*sigh*
I plainly said that BLS doesn't have a SWAT team. You know that's what I said. Pulling one sentence out of the paragraph to distort my plain meaning is a distortion and is dishonest.
I can explain it to you, but I can't comprehend it for you.
Get back to me when you can debate like an adult.
sigh all you want, Dan.
As you plainly said, and I quote directly.....
"There was no SWAT team." PERIOD

I can do this as long as you deny that statement.
My time is free and this is fun.

This left the realm of debate when you denied making that statement.
It has moved into petty bickering since your denial.

:^`P
Independent

United States

#41 May 2, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
You are either lying or not telling the truth. I don't know if you're always wrong because of your embarrassingly low intelligence or your shamefully weak IQ. I don't know whether to mock you or just make fun of you.
LMAO!
Do whatever makes you happy, Dan.
You only show your true colors.
It won't take one second off of my life span.

:^`P

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#42 May 2, 2014
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
sigh all you want, Dan.
As you plainly said, and I quote directly.....
"There was no SWAT team." PERIOD
I can do this as long as you deny that statement.
My time is free and this is fun.
This left the realm of debate when you denied making that statement.
It has moved into petty bickering since your denial.
:^`P
And what came after the period? More of the same thought.

So if you misunderstood the first sentence, the very next sentence clarified exactly what I was talking about.

You can continue your petty bickering as long as you like, but it won't change the facts of reality. Let me know when you're ready to move on to actual debate.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#43 May 2, 2014
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
Do whatever makes you happy, Dan.
You only show your true colors.
It won't take one second off of my life span.
:^`P
Right.

Over.

His.

Head.

LMAO!
Independent

United States

#44 May 2, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Right.
Over.
His.
Head.
LMAO!
Des

per

at

ion

LMAO

:^`P
Independent

United States

#45 May 2, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
but it won't change the facts of reality.
Dan, you live in a different reality from the rest of the world.

:^`P

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#46 May 2, 2014
Enforcing the law is not "armed aggression."

Confronting United States law enforcement with armed resistance is sedition.

Why does the right refuse to support enforcing the law in this particular case when they claim that's core to their ideology?

Why are they on the side of separatist sedition instead of the side of the nation they claim to love?

I keep asking these questions and all I get in return are dishonest distortions of my own positions in order to justify childish personal attacks. It's almost like the rightwingers here know they can't answer the questions based on the facts.
Independent

United States

#51 May 3, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
I keep asking these questions and all I get in return are dishonest distortions of my own positions in order to justify childish personal attacks.
Boohoohoo.....

Don't whine, Dan. Be a man.....like your moniker suggests.
Learn to not put a period in the middle of a thought. It changes meanings drastically.
Admit when you are in err.
Just because you post something doesn't make it true. Realize that.

Here is a Kleenex....blow your nose and start again.
And most of all stop whining about childish personal attacks when you lead the pack in that respect.

:^`P
Independent

United States

#52 May 3, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Enforcing the law is not "armed aggression."
Was the BLM armed?.....Yes
Were they aggressive?.....Yes

Most bill collectors just use the phone.
It is not sedition to protect others from aggression.

:^`P

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Hillary Clinton wavers on Second Amendment righ... 12 min Sheriff Joe 529 1,201
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 1 hr kuda 14
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a "paraly... 16 hr Jagermann 1
News Obama to seek healing in Orlando even as politi... Sun OK Barry 61
Freestanding B-e-l-f-a-s-t Sink Unit Jun 23 boyocuy 1
News The Latest: House GOP says electronic devices s... Jun 23 payme 2
News Bristol Palin is engaged (May '15) Jun 22 Uncle Bens AWOLdaddy 68
More from around the web