Giffords' gun control group aims at McConnell in ad onslaught

Apr 24, 2013 Full story: WHAS11 38

Sen. Mitch McConnell is the target of a new radio ad criticizing his opposition to gun control legislation that he helped defeat in the U.S. Senate.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Feb 13

Amarillo, TX

#1 Apr 24, 2013
Spend money in the 9th most conservative state full of hunters for an anti-gun agenda. Yeah, that is smart spending.

Especially when there are so many definitions of universal background checks. And the fact that, no matter how it is defined, criminals will never submit to them and criminals will get guns the same way they do now.
decent woman

Louisville, KY

#2 Apr 24, 2013
vote mcconnell 2014! we love you mitch! keep ky decent!
CBOW

East Berlin, PA

#4 Apr 24, 2013
Giffords wasn't the sharpest knife in the drawer before she got her lobotomy......
Shasta21

United States

#5 Apr 24, 2013
Maybe the gun rights groups should spend money for ads against the senators that voted for that stupid bill.
Sir Bucking Fastard

UK

#6 Apr 24, 2013
People might want to be asking how it is that Giffords —having been shot in the head— managed to NOT have ANY hair loss around that wound, inasmuch as in order to properly treat that area, the medical staff would surely have shaved the ENTIRE area around that wound.
Then it would have taken OVER TWO YEARS for her hair to reach its the length shown.
So, WAS she actually shot in the head? If so, WHERE is the wound scar?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#7 Apr 24, 2013
Sir Bucking Fastard wrote:
People might want to be asking how it is that Giffords —having been shot in the head— managed to NOT have ANY hair loss around that wound, inasmuch as in order to properly treat that area, the medical staff would surely have shaved the ENTIRE area around that wound.
Then it would have taken OVER TWO YEARS for her hair to reach its the length shown.
So, WAS she actually shot in the head? If so, WHERE is the wound scar?
I can't believe you're actually asking this.

I never thought there was a right wing idiot who would try to prove they're a superior party idiot...

... I see that I'm wrong.
donnie

United States

#8 Apr 24, 2013
Sir Bucking Fastard wrote:
People might want to be asking how it is that Giffords —having been shot in the head— managed to NOT have ANY hair loss around that wound, inasmuch as in order to properly treat that area, the medical staff would surely have shaved the ENTIRE area around that wound.
Then it would have taken OVER TWO YEARS for her hair to reach its the length shown.
So, WAS she actually shot in the head? If so, WHERE is the wound scar?
Ever heard of a wig?
CBOW

East Berlin, PA

#9 Apr 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I can't believe you're actually asking this.
I never thought there was a right wing idiot who would try to prove they're a superior party idiot...
... I see that I'm wrong.
"I see that I'm wrong." You usually are, you're a liberal.
Lib

London, KY

#10 Apr 25, 2013
Shelly Bl wrote:
Spend money in the 9th most conservative state full of hunters for an anti-gun agenda. Yeah, that is smart spending.
Especially when there are so many definitions of universal background checks. And the fact that, no matter how it is defined, criminals will never submit to them and criminals will get guns the same way they do now.
fOOl! that's the point! criminals won't subject themselves to a background ck...

so IF...Gun Show...LOOP HOLES...were 'closed' and you HAD to have a background ck to PuRcHaSe a GUN at a Gun Show, they WOULDN'T buy one there now would they?

'here's your sign'....

gOOd ole gun toting KY VOTERS 'FAVORED' Universal BACKground Checks at 87% that's EIGHTY SEVEN pErCENT...or eighteee 7 PERcent.

so your little ole 13 per center wont hardly beat that big ole 87 percenter EVEN if 50% of the 87% don't show UP at the polls in 2014.

See, we don't want to help rapist, criminals, & all round terrorist have the same weapons as we do.

Haven't you seen the 'FBI's Most Wanted' Al Qaeda requiter on TV teaching his latest crop of terrorist how to buy guns at Gun Shows? Think it's a joke? Ask those folks in Boston if they're laughing Redneck.

What's the matter, YOU can't pass a background ck?
Lib

London, KY

#11 Apr 25, 2013
Sir Bucking Fastard wrote:
People might want to be asking how it is that Giffords —having been shot in the head— managed to NOT have ANY hair loss around that wound, inasmuch as in order to properly treat that area, the medical staff would surely have shaved the ENTIRE area around that wound.
Then it would have taken OVER TWO YEARS for her hair to reach its the length shown.
So, WAS she actually shot in the head? If so, WHERE is the wound scar?
God has ways of opening your eyes so you can see crystal clear how things come about, & this couldn't happen to a nicer person than you.

'here's your sign'

Since: Feb 13

Amarillo, TX

#12 Apr 25, 2013
Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
fOOl! that's the point! criminals won't subject themselves to a background ck...
so IF...Gun Show...LOOP HOLES...were 'closed' and you HAD to have a background ck to PuRcHaSe a GUN at a Gun Show, they WOULDN'T buy one there now would they?
'here's your sign'....
gOOd ole gun toting KY VOTERS 'FAVORED' Universal BACKground Checks at 87% that's EIGHTY SEVEN pErCENT...or eighteee 7 PERcent.
so your little ole 13 per center wont hardly beat that big ole 87 percenter EVEN if 50% of the 87% don't show UP at the polls in 2014.
See, we don't want to help rapist, criminals, & all round terrorist have the same weapons as we do.
Haven't you seen the 'FBI's Most Wanted' Al Qaeda requiter on TV teaching his latest crop of terrorist how to buy guns at Gun Shows? Think it's a joke? Ask those folks in Boston if they're laughing Redneck.
What's the matter, YOU can't pass a background ck?
Sounds like your meds need adjustment. If you are really not a antigun advocate and are just showing how stupid the anti-gun people can sound disregard the first sentence.

Universal background checks won't change a criminal's gun buying habits.

87% of KY wants UBCs? Really? Show the link to that study.

Nobody wants to help criminals. But there has yet to be a gun control law proposed that will help stop the criminals. They don't buy firearms at gun shops or gun shows (very few do). They normally steal them, trade for drugs or buy them from other criminals. UBCs won't change that behavior.

The folks in Boston would probably loved to had firearms to protect themselves. But that's state has pretty insane 2nd Amendment restrictions.

I have no problem passing background checks, do you?
Patriot

Antioch, TN

#13 Apr 25, 2013
They need to ask if the Boston bombers were prevented obtaining firearms by a background check. We know that answer. and we know the answer whether they obtained them legally.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#14 Apr 25, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>"I see that I'm wrong." You usually are, you're a liberal.
lol! It's better than being an idiot like you son.

I can change. You refuse!
Smarter Than You

Louisville, KY

#15 Apr 25, 2013
Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
See, we don't want to help rapist, criminals, & all round terrorist have the same weapons as we do.
That's exactly why this bill was immediately shot down. Universal background checks didn't make it die in the senat, the assault weapons ban slipped in killed it. If it had passed, "rapist, criminals, & all round terrorist" wouldn't have the same weapons as we do - they'd have better ones.
Smarter Than You

Louisville, KY

#16 Apr 25, 2013
Shelly Bl wrote:
<quoted text>87% of KY wants UBCs? Really? Show the link to that study.
Watch, she'll try to post that manipulated poll from the Liberal-Journal that ol' limp-wrist Johnny Yarmuth kept pushing on MSNBC for weeks. A manipulated poll where they just called all the liberal hippies in the highlands so they would get the results that pushed their political agenda. Another liberal biased poll from the Courier-Urinal that has no scientific accuracy whatsoever, therefor null and void.
FormerParatroope r

Toledo, OH

#17 Apr 25, 2013
Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
fOOl! that's the point! criminals won't subject themselves to a background ck...
so IF...Gun Show...LOOP HOLES...were 'closed' and you HAD to have a background ck to PuRcHaSe a GUN at a Gun Show, they WOULDN'T buy one there now would they?
'here's your sign'....
gOOd ole gun toting KY VOTERS 'FAVORED' Universal BACKground Checks at 87% that's EIGHTY SEVEN pErCENT...or eighteee 7 PERcent.
so your little ole 13 per center wont hardly beat that big ole 87 percenter EVEN if 50% of the 87% don't show UP at the polls in 2014.
See, we don't want to help rapist, criminals, & all round terrorist have the same weapons as we do.
Haven't you seen the 'FBI's Most Wanted' Al Qaeda requiter on TV teaching his latest crop of terrorist how to buy guns at Gun Shows? Think it's a joke? Ask those folks in Boston if they're laughing Redneck.
What's the matter, YOU can't pass a background ck?
What is the gunshow loophole exactly?

Boston was done by bombs, made of common household items and fireworks, what law would you implement to eradicate the risk of it happening again? A background check? Maybe a ban of some sort?
CBOW

East Berlin, PA

#18 Apr 26, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! It's better than being an idiot like you son.
I can change. You refuse!
But you won't, will you? Once the liberal disease sets in, the only cure is to become a victim of those you elevate to human status. Just because it walks upright does not make it a trustworthy human. We'll keep our guns because we know when to call a spade a spade.....
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#19 Apr 26, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
But you won't, will you? Once the liberal disease sets in, the only cure is to become a victim of those you elevate to human status. Just because it walks upright does not make it a trustworthy human. We'll keep our guns because we know when to call a spade a spade.....
lol! Why should I son? I'm not wrong.

But if you like less government and playing with your toys on a regular basis, I suggest Somalia. I think you'll fit right in with the crowd!
CBOW

East Berlin, PA

#20 Apr 26, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Why should I son? I'm not wrong.
But if you like less government and playing with your toys on a regular basis, I suggest Somalia. I think you'll fit right in with the crowd!
I can play with my 69 Camaro and 72 Chevelle and not have to work???? I could be just like you, only with cool cars.
The Flying Pig

UK

#21 Apr 26, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I can't believe you're actually asking this.
I never thought there was a right wing idiot who would try to prove they're a superior party idiot...
... I see that I'm wrong.
Well, WHERE is the wound?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ferguson braces for grand jury decision 6 hr Here Is One 14
Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) 8 hr Marauder 12,171
Magnum Research Introduces Stainless Steel Dese... Wed Here Is One 1
Concealed carry does not make us safer (Nov '09) Tue fae31 6,985
Texas open carry is shooting itself in the foot Dec 20 Independent1 9
Open Carry Activist Charged With Shooting Ex-Hu... Dec 13 Here Is One 3
Deer Hunting Time Dec 9 kurtcooksalot16 1
More from around the web