'Deport Piers Morgan': bid to kick out TV host for gun stance

Dec 23, 2012 Full story: The Age 23

US gun rights advocates have signed a White House petition calling for British CNN host Piers Morgan to be deported for allegedly attacking the Second Amendment rights of ordinary Americans.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Dec 12

Cookeville, TN

#1 Dec 23, 2012

“Pompous pontificator”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#2 Dec 23, 2012
No matter what side of an argument, a loudmouth is rude and annoying. Seems the left have more than their fair share of brash bigmouths.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#3 Dec 23, 2012
Piers Morgan needs mental health help.

He cannot hold a rational discussion.

He rants and raves and goes flying off the handle and cannot be calm and listen.

I think he should be adjudicated mentally unfit for firearm ownership.

God save the Queen and one million British government CCTV cameras.
Ping

Queen Creek, AZ

#6 Dec 23, 2012
He should be deported for just being annoying.
Mark Winshel

Orinda, CA

#7 Dec 24, 2012
Everytime there is a situation in which someone similar to Gian Luigi Ferri or Adam Lanza goes on a shooting spree, the liberals then go into high gear demanding more gun control laws.

However actually if the liberals and gun control advocates were really serious about protecting public health and safety, then they would concern themselves a lot less with gun control and a lot more with crooked lawyer control.

More specifically, approx 2.5 million people die every year in the US, and which is approx fifty thousand people per week, seven thousand people per day, and approx three hundred people per hour.

A lot of those deaths are people dying prematurely, and including from lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes, mesothelioma, and asbestosis, etc, etc, etc, due to toxic materials they are secretly exposed to, and as a result of hazardous situations in which crooked lawyers usually harass, threaten, and intimidate whistleblowers into silence, and so that those situations resulting in slow mass murder can continue.

In other words while the number of people killed over the last fifty years in the US in shooting sprees is less than one thousand people total, however crooked lawyers, and thru slow mass murder, kill far more people than that every single week, and in fact probably every single day.

However since lawyers are major sources of election campaign fundraising to the Democratic Party, therefore the "great liberals" and "wonderful humanitarians, and such as Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, who serve as leaders of the Demagogue Party, do not care how many people are victims of slow mass murder due to crooked lawyers as long as those crooked lawyers keep the money flowing to prominent Democrats.

Since: Sep 08

Neon City Oh.

#8 Dec 24, 2012
2nd amendment fools, want to do away with all the other amendments.
Yes, Pepe LePew is CRAZY.
NOTthechildren

Bryn Mawr, PA

#9 Dec 24, 2012
Apparently he is claiming we are violating HIS first admendment rights to free speech. And yet if we advocate/speak about gun ownership we're labled as crazies. On one of the boards they said when you are a guest you don't complain about somebody else's house.

Do not forget this Brit has been involved in a phone message hacking scandal in the UK getting PERSONAL phome message information. The ends justify the means with this toad.

http://www.businessinsider.com/piers-morgan-f...

Alot of brits act like this. I've had the displeasure of working with and then for a brit. They ARE very arrogant. Even the job where the brit was my coworker he acted like he was in charge. The supervisor eventually got pushed out of the not getting along with her supervisor. But to their credit at least one of them immigrated got his US citizenship.

Too many brits seem to forget we fought a war to get away from them. As did many other citizens in their colonies.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#10 Dec 24, 2012
You know you all are feeding into the Media Propaganda Machine, right?

If you try to deport a person for exercising freedoms that we all cherish, what does that make you?
NOTthechildren

Bryn Mawr, PA

#11 Dec 24, 2012
TheBlackSheep wrote:
You know you all are feeding into the Media Propaganda Machine, right?
If you try to deport a person for exercising freedoms that we all cherish, what does that make you?
It is a bit of a conundrum but the actual deportation petition cites sedition or inciting overthrow as some of the premise for deportation.

But as a guest in this country who the frack is brit hacker Piers Morgan to not only express AN opinion but to actually lobby for a change that suits his views. He is a guest in this country-that's it.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#12 Dec 24, 2012
NOTthechildren wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a bit of a conundrum but the actual deportation petition cites sedition or inciting overthrow as some of the premise for deportation.
But as a guest in this country who the frack is brit hacker Piers Morgan to not only express AN opinion but to actually lobby for a change that suits his views. He is a guest in this country-that's it.
I am not sticking up for the pompous ass and what idiot would listen too Him? I don't listen to the media to make my decisions.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#13 Dec 24, 2012
TheBlackSheep wrote:
You know you all are feeding into the Media Propaganda Machine, right?
If you try to deport a person for exercising freedoms that we all cherish, what does that make you?
Deportation of a person of influence who is exposing anti American ideas and will not be subject to prosecution at home is legal and in this case an excellent idea.

If he was a lunatic American reporter like Chris Mathews I would support his First Amendment rights.

In this case Mr. Morgan is on USA soil as a guest and just like a badly behaving house guest it is time to ask him to leave and barring his voluntary participation then he should be escorted off the premises.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#18 Dec 24, 2012
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Deportation of a person of influence who is exposing anti American ideas and will not be subject to prosecution at home is legal and in this case an excellent idea.
If he was a lunatic American reporter like Chris Mathews I would support his First Amendment rights.
In this case Mr. Morgan is on USA soil as a guest and just like a badly behaving house guest it is time to ask him to leave and barring his voluntary participation then he should be escorted off the premises.
Who is he influencing that won't be influenced by him from England? Sometimes, having an idiot speak is good for the opposition. Showing that we stand behind our freedoms, even when offended by then, is what makes us Great! Just my opinion, of course.
Is that

Santa Fe, NM

#19 Dec 25, 2012
TheBlackSheep wrote:
<quoted text>

Sometimes, having an idiot speak is good for the opposition.

.
your strategy?
If the

Santa Fe, NM

#20 Dec 25, 2012
NOTthechildren wrote:
. And yet if we advocate/speak about gun ownership we're labled as crazies.
.
shoe fits
Sean Livingstone

Lawrence, KS

#21 Dec 25, 2012
Before you make any judgments... look into the eyes of the shooting victims.... no one is calling the ban on guns... until there are ways to stop criminals and nuts from buying guns, stop selling them. Your fear and hobby are affecting the lives of many. People die and you Guyana offer no solution except... oh it's the second amendment... oh guns don't kill human do.... another solution to offer for your selfish hobby?
Get Out

Jacksonville, NC

#23 Dec 25, 2012
Sean Livingstone wrote:
Before you make any judgments... look into the eyes of the shooting victims.... no one is calling the ban on guns... until there are ways to stop criminals and nuts from buying guns, stop selling them. Your fear and hobby are affecting the lives of many. People die and you Guyana offer no solution except... oh it's the second amendment... oh guns don't kill human do.... another solution to offer for your selfish hobby?
May be the NRA got the idea to put armed security in schools came from a Democrate!
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/ ...

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#24 Dec 25, 2012
Sean Livingstone wrote:
Before you make any judgments... look into the eyes of the shooting victims.... no one is calling the ban on guns... until there are ways to stop criminals and nuts from buying guns, stop selling them. Your fear and hobby are affecting the lives of many. People die and you Guyana offer no solution except... oh it's the second amendment... oh guns don't kill human do.... another solution to offer for your selfish hobby?
"Before you make any judgments... look into the eyes of the shooting victims" !?!?!? You base your judgements on emotions? Try logic if you want to have a real discussion.

Emotions got us in a war with Iraq.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#25 Dec 25, 2012
Get Out wrote:
<quoted text>
May be the NRA got the idea to put armed security in schools came from a Democrate!
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/ ...
But when a Democrat says it, it is much smarter.
Mark Winshel

Orinda, CA

#27 Dec 25, 2012
To elaborate a bit on my previous post, and which was post # 7, in some situations, and such as for instance in some office buildings, the building ownership and/or management company will drastically reduce the cost of remodeling projects by allowing asbestos dust (and/or other hazardous materials) to blow all over the tenants, employees, customers, and visitors, and rather than taking the necessary precautions to keep the building's occupants from being exposed to conditions that will cause many of them to eventually get diseases, and such as lung cancer, that will considerably shorten their lives.

For instance in one particular large office building I worked in, it was standard procedure for the remodeling projects in areas that contained large amounts of asbestos to be done in such a way that asbestos dust was regularly blowing so blatantly, flagrantly, and openly all over the tenants and their desks, that therefore most of the tenants automatically assumed it was just ordinary plaster and dust.

When a whistleblower complains about such practices, and which are really a form of slow mass murder, the way the offender almost always handles it is to hire the sleaziest prsofessional pathological liars and common criminals hiding behind law licenses it can find to pretend to "investigate" the evidence and the allegations.

Then, and after the crooked lawyers go thru their charades of pretending to "investigate" the evidence, they almost every single time insist there is no foundation to the whistleblower's complaints, and they then retaliate against the whistleblower, and which: one, therefore often allows the offender to continue engaging in slow mass murder; and two, causes most other potential whistlblowers in similar situations to decide to keep their mouths shut so that they themselves will not be subjected to the harassment and blacklisting from future employment that previous whistleblowers almost always were.

In other words, the actions of crooked lawyers result in far more murders every single week than people such as Charles hitman, Gian Lugi Ferri, and Adam Lanza, etc, have killed over the last fifty years.

However since crooked lawyers for decades have been providing a fortune in election campaign contributions to the Democratic Party, therefore the liberals and gun control advocates have done very little to control crooked lawyers.
Mid Term 2014

Canton, GA

#28 Dec 25, 2012
Mark Winshel wrote:
To elaborate a bit on my previous post, and which was post # 7, in some situations, and such as for instance in some office buildings, the building ownership and/or management company will drastically reduce the cost of remodeling projects by allowing asbestos dust (and/or other hazardous materials) to blow all over the tenants, employees, customers, and visitors, and rather than taking the necessary precautions to keep the building's occupants from being exposed to conditions that will cause many of them to eventually get diseases, and such as lung cancer, that will considerably shorten their lives.
For instance in one particular large office building I worked in, it was standard procedure for the remodeling projects in areas that contained large amounts of asbestos to be done in such a way that asbestos dust was regularly blowing so blatantly, flagrantly, and openly all over the tenants and their desks, that therefore most of the tenants automatically assumed it was just ordinary plaster and dust.
When a whistleblower complains about such practices, and which are really a form of slow mass murder, the way the offender almost always handles it is to hire the sleaziest prsofessional pathological liars and common criminals hiding behind law licenses it can find to pretend to "investigate" the evidence and the allegations.
Then, and after the crooked lawyers go thru their charades of pretending to "investigate" the evidence, they almost every single time insist there is no foundation to the whistleblower's complaints, and they then retaliate against the whistleblower, and which: one, therefore often allows the offender to continue engaging in slow mass murder; and two, causes most other potential whistlblowers in similar situations to decide to keep their mouths shut so that they themselves will not be subjected to the harassment and blacklisting from future employment that previous whistleblowers almost always were.
In other words, the actions of crooked lawyers result in far more murders every single week than people such as Charles hitman, Gian Lugi Ferri, and Adam Lanza, etc, have killed over the last fifty years.
However since crooked lawyers for decades have been providing a fortune in election campaign contributions to the Democratic Party, therefore the liberals and gun control advocates have done very little to control crooked lawyers.
You are so spot on with this post.

The Pro 2nd Amendment movement crosses all party lines. We must not let the anti gun crowd erase our gains. They want to blame all gun owners for the actions of one lunatic.

_______

Sign the petition to deport cnn's Peirs Morgan for attacking the 2nd Amendment.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/dep...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) 7 hr Professor of Math... 12,100
Texas open carry is shooting itself in the foot 19 hr Independent1 9
Open Carry Activist Charged With Shooting Ex-Hu... Dec 13 Here Is One 3
Ferguson braces for grand jury decision Dec 11 Vern5554566 4
Deer Hunting Time Dec 9 kurtcooksalot16 1
Bill would stiffen background checks Dec 8 Independent1 3
SAFE Act PROTEST draws crowd in Lewis County (Jun '13) Dec 7 lowville resident 4
More from around the web