Connecticut passes strictest gun control laws in US as Obama's reforms stall

Apr 4, 2013 Full story: Guardian Unlimited 1,562

A makeshift memorial to the victims of the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, which has reignited the national debate on gun control.

Full Story

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#1758 Apr 26, 2013
The Flying Pig wrote:
<quoted text>
Masturbation is your game, because you repeat yourself endlessly. How does it feel to be a perpetual jerk off?
I'm not sure yet. I'm still practicing how to be a frightwing birther nut teabag hypocrite.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1759 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
United States Circuit Court,
DISTRICT OF MISSOURI,
SPECIAL JULY TERM, 1861.
1861, traitor state.

Don't care.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1760 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I'd be ashamed to show my face if I were you.
You can't even stick to one alias, GAYDavy.

I speak for others when I say: I hope you wipe your face before you show it.

You are a mess.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1761 Apr 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
1861, traitor state.
Don't care.
“The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them. The government is administered by the representatives of the people, voluntarily and freely chosen.
"Under these circumstances, should any one attempt to establish their own system, in prejudice of the rest, they would be universally detested and opposed, and easily frustrated. This is a principle which secures religious liberty most firmly.”-- Zachariah Johnson, Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 25, 1788.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1762 Apr 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't even stick to one alias, GAYDavy.
I speak for others when I say: I hope you wipe your face before you show it.
You are a mess.
"17th. That the people have a right to keep and bear arms; that a well regulated militia, including the body of the people capable of bearing arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free state; that the militia shall not be subject to martial law, except in time of war, rebellion, or insurrection; that standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and ought not to be kept up, except in eases of necessity; and that at all times, the military should be under strict subordination to the civil power....18th. That any person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms ought to be exempted..."-- Page 160 - Journal of The Senate, Ratification of the constitution by the convention of the state of Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations.(Rhode-Island,Newp ort, June 9, 1790).

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#1763 Apr 27, 2013
The Flying Pig wrote:
<quoted text>
Masturbation is your game, because you repeat yourself endlessly. How does it feel to be a perpetual jerk off?
He and Obama are both pivot men........
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#1764 Apr 27, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
...and where's that phoney nom de plume with the frosted face, au confraud? Oh...still here:

http://www.topix.com/member/profile/aucontrai...

hahahahahahahahaha

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#1765 Apr 27, 2013
Sorry pookie, I'm not posting to you. You send out viruses. What's wrong, wouldn't Topix do you job for you this time. You and Soros are a hoot.
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#1766 Apr 27, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
au confraud is an inbred virus, pookster.

hahahahahahahahahaha

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1767 Apr 27, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
“The
"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.[United States v.] Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."

Justice Scalia
Speaking for the SCOTUS majority
this century

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1768 Apr 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Like most rights, the Second Amendment ...
"What are the inalienable and inherent rights that belong to the individual? The first and nearest one is what? The right of enjoying and defending his life. Whether he be saint or sinner, Protestant or Catholic, or what not, the first inalienable right he has, and ought to be protected in, is that of enjoying and defending his life. The next in importance is the right of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of his conscience. The third, the right of seeking and pursuing his safety and happiness. The fourth, the right of communicating his thought and his opinions. Fifth, the right to acquire and protect property. Sixth, the right to meet and consult with his fellows as to what will promote the common welfare. Seventh--and while enjoying all these rights, these six that I have just mentioned, he has the right to bear arms in defense of himself, his family and his state, and no man can take it away. There are seven inalienable and inherent rights of the individual man."

- Mr. C.T. Allen, Oct. 9, 1890.[Official Report of the Proceedings and Debates in the Convention, Kentucky]

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1769 Apr 27, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"What are the inalienable and inherent rights
Justice Scalia.
US Supreme Court
Alive.

GayDAvy: multiple aliases, opinion worthless

“have seen the years,”

Since: Mar 10

and the slow parade of fears"

#1770 Apr 27, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"What are the inalienable and inherent rights that belong to the individual? The first and nearest one is what? The right of enjoying and defending his life. Whether he be saint or sinner, Protestant or Catholic, or what not, the first inalienable right he has, and ought to be protected in, is that of enjoying and defending his life. The next in importance is the right of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of his conscience. The third, the right of seeking and pursuing his safety and happiness. The fourth, the right of communicating his thought and his opinions. Fifth, the right to acquire and protect property. Sixth, the right to meet and consult with his fellows as to what will promote the common welfare. Seventh--and while enjoying all these rights, these six that I have just mentioned, he has the right to bear arms in defense of himself, his family and his state, and no man can take it away. There are seven inalienable and inherent rights of the individual man."
- Mr. C.T. Allen, Oct. 9, 1890.[Official Report of the Proceedings and Debates in the Convention, Kentucky]
LOL! This shows you know nothing about what you keep spewing trash about. Have you really read this? It is totally worthless to the discussion. Face it. With idiotic comments like yours, you might as well pack up your armory and turn it over now! You repugnantcans are such lying, cheating, spinning, stealing, wannabe bullying losers! What a waste of space.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1771 Apr 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Justice Scalia.
US Supreme Court
Alive.
GayDAvy: multiple aliases, opinion worthless
"The constitutional right to bear arms is intended to guaranty to the people, in support of just government, such right, and to afford the citizen means for defense of self and property. While this secures to him a right of which he cannot be deprived, it enjoins a duty in execution of which that right is to be exercised. If he employs those arms which he ought to wield for the safety and protection of his country, his person, and his property, to the annoyance and terror and danger of its citizens, his acts find no vindication in the bill of rights. That guaranty was never intended as a warrant for vicious persons to carry weapons with which to terrorize others. Going armed with unusual and dangerous weapons, to the terror of the people, is an offense at common law. A man may carry a gun for any lawful purpose, for business or amusement, but he cannot go about with that or any other dangerous weapon to terrify and alarm a peaceful people."--Chief Justice William T. Spear, Supreme Court of Ohio, State v. Hogan, 63 Ohio 202, 58 N.E. 572, 52 L.R.A. 863, 81 Am. St. 626 (1900).

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1772 Apr 27, 2013
Doctor My Eyes wrote:
It is totally worthless to the discussion.
He spins a wheel with gives him the number of the copy & paste quote he insists and it becomes the quote of the day which he posts in all threads.

Sound familiar?

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1773 Apr 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
He spins a wheel with gives him the number of the copy & paste quote he insists and it becomes the quote of the day which he posts in all threads.
Sound familiar?
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

Doesn't matter what ANY division of ANY American government declares to the contrary. That IS the "SUPREME LAW of the LAND". And ANYTHING to the contrary NOTWITHSTANDING.

To bad for you and your fellow treasonous ilk, eh?

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#1774 Apr 28, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.[United States v.] Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."
Justice Scalia
Speaking for the SCOTUS majority
this century
Show us where that is in the constitution.........waiting.
conservative crapola

Allentown, PA

#1775 Apr 28, 2013
Even the Founding Fathers practiced gun control. In order to keep dangerous fools, like yourslef, in line. Next........

hahahahahahahahahahaha

The Founding Fathers practiced strict gun control. The most racist was the law barring black people from owning guns. The Black Panthers declared they had a right to defend themselves but the NRA disagreed. The NRA fervently backed gun controls during those years. Just like the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers also required that all long guns (muskets) be regularly inspected and REGISTERED with the new government. They held regular “musters” in the town square where every weapon had to be presented to the militia for full inspection. Those who did not swear allegiance to the new government were not allowed to own guns. Some were compelled to acquire a fighting weapon and join the militia or their rights were severely restricted.

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#1776 Apr 28, 2013
Yawn, come back pookie when you have proof that it is in the constitution.
conservative crapola

Allentown, PA

#1777 Apr 28, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
You couldn't live by the Constitution.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Opinion Line 20 min kuda 42
Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) 1 hr Surprise 10,843
Moms Demand Action Calls On Kroger Family Of St... 16 hr Kentucky-Mitch 9
Fact or Fiction: Push-Feed Rifles Won't Cycle R... Tue Tory II 1
3 year old shoots AR and survives Sep 15 Tory II 4
30-06 (7.62X63) vs .308 (7.62X51) (Feb '11) Sep 15 Tory II 96
Chicago Liberals Outlaw the Firearm Industry Sep 15 Tory II 1
•••

Guns People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••