People do not need assault weapons: defense secretary

Jan 17, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Reuters

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta joined the gun control debate on Thursday when he told troops at a military base in Italy that only soldiers needed armor-piercing bullets or assault weapons.

Comments (Page 237)

Showing posts 4,721 - 4,740 of4,995
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Tray

Saltillo, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5049
Mar 30, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
~stomp stomp stomp~
wow... snappy comeback.
Dodge duck dodge. When are you going to show a beer company liable for shooting while drunk. Or hell even answer ANY of my questions. I love it when you claim you don't answer irrelevant posts but then do it anyway but don't address the issue.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5053
Mar 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
PRECISELY. For that is exactly why the first 10 amendments were INSISTED upon. We were NOT intended to be governed by the 'tyranny of the majority'.
Especially the 'tyranny' of the 90- percent who ninety percent who want background checks and the 'tyranny' of the Supreme Court which keeps insisting states have a right for reasonable gun control and the 'tyranny' of the majority that keeps passing laws that the NRA finds so offensive.

Too bad: the 2nd Amendment doesn't give you the right to carry assault weapons into public schools.

No matter how hard you and your special rights group stomp your feet.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5054
Mar 30, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
All product liability lawsuits, Mooch.
I know: reading isn't your forte.
Liar...Why do you continually try to lie your way out of an argument...?

"I know: reading isn't your forte."

Really...?...then why does the law say that you can...?...just like I said...? You are still an ignorant, lying, POS, "frustrated control freak".

15 USC CHAPTER 105 - PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS
15 USC § 7901 - FINDINGS; PURPOSES
To prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers,
distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages,
injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others.
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection of Lawful Commerce
in Arms Act’’.
15 USC § 7903 - DEFINITIONS
“…but shall not include—

(v)an action for death, physical injuries or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the product, when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner,…”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/cha...

Seems to me that you just proved yourself a liar...again...and the one whose "reading isn't your forte."

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5056
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
""The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed."
Always funny to see the gnutters cough up one half of the Second Amendment.

Always funny to see the gun gnutters forget the dozens of state and federal regulations already endorsed by the Supreme Court qualifying regulations.

Even the first amendment isn't a blank check to give people the "right" to say whatever they please.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5057
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
Our opinion is, that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right, originally belonging to our forefathers
1846... how many people born in the USA who would otherwise be citizens were enslaved at this time?

Putting aside most of the signers of the Constitution were also slave owners.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5058
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
--Chief Justice Collier
Not US Supreme Court, Shug.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5059
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
<
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear arms shall NOT be infringed".
Not from the US Constitution, gun gnutter.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5061
Mar 30, 2013
 
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Liar...Why do you continually try to lie your way out of an argument...?
"I know: reading isn't your forte."
Really...?...then why does the law say that you can...?...just like I said...? You are still an ignorant, lying, POS, "frustrated control freak".
15 USC CHAPTER 105 - PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS
15 USC § 7901 - FINDINGS; PURPOSES
To prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers,
distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages,
injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others.
Reading is not your forte, Shug.

Misquoting is.

Stick to what you know: misquoting, putting up outright lies, and deception.

I've already given you the Bush bill, I am not going to make you read it.
Spocko

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5064
Mar 30, 2013
 
Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
So should auto manufacturers be held liable for vehicular manslaughter every time someone dies in a car accident?
Which pat of accident don't you understand?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5065
Mar 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DavidQ762 wrote:
Not long ago in this country kids used to take their guns to school.
Complete load of cr@p.

The picture of Johnny shooting a deer on the way home in the good old days is complete wad of NRA jiizz that toads like yourself are just too eager and swallow.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5066
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how you freedom and liberty haters always fall back on that.
Funny how NRA special rights alternate lifestyle fall back on that.

Wipe your chin, Davy, here commes another wad.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5067
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
The severity of your blindness is becoming more and more apparent.
That low pressure zone your create by your constant sucking is causing thunderstorms and golf-stone sized hail in Ohio and parts of Iowa.
Brad

Manchester, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5069
Mar 30, 2013
 
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Which pat of accident don't you understand?
So if some whack job purposely runs down and kills another person the auto manufacturer is responsible for that?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5070
Mar 30, 2013
 
Brad wrote:
So if some whack job purposely runs down and kills another person the auto manufacturer is responsible for that?
Tell me: have you stopped beating your kids?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5071
Mar 30, 2013
 
Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
So if some whack job purposely runs down and kills another person the auto manufacturer is responsible for that?
PS: you should talk with someone- a professional- for having these kinds of thoughts.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5072
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
Guess the debate is over then, eh adolescent? Can't win so you resort to childish ad hominem attacks.
If you dish it out, Shug, then don't whine just because I've hurt your feelings.

I get enough of that from the Frenchman.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5073
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet you have no problem with your 'masters' carrying their,
WAHHHHHHHHHH! WAHHHHHHHHHHH!

MOMMY!

I can dish it out WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! make Barefoot stop throwing it back!

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5074
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong moron, I sure CAN say whatever I please. I also have to be prepared to face the consequences..
WAHHH! WAHHHHHHHHH!

MOMMMY!

Davy, seriously, Shug: you should get an official copy of the us Constitution, not the Cliff Notes edition.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5075
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
Believe the kourt would call that a MOOT POINT.
You don't know what 'moot point' is either, dear.

Maybe you should go back to your blog and cry somewhere there where the tree falls in the forest and no one can hear you cry?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5076
Mar 30, 2013
 
DavidQ762 wrote:
Believe the kourt would call that a MOOT POINT.
PS: pointing out that it was not a Supreme Court justice when you pretended it was isn't moot to making you look the fool you are, Davy.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 4,721 - 4,740 of4,995
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••