Area gun sales, fears rising

Area gun sales, fears rising

There are 7574 comments on the North Port Sun story from Nov 14, 2012, titled Area gun sales, fears rising. In it, North Port Sun reports that:

Gun stores in Charlotte County have experienced increased sales since Election Day as local gun owners brace for an anticipated restriction of gun laws following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at North Port Sun.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#7716 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
That may be a valid point, but how do you get oil company owners to keep their oil here in the US where the goal is to decrease the profit on it? How do you make them keep it here, without violating their rights? The way I see it, if we want oil company owners to sacrifice their profit margin to be a do gooder, we should have taken the path in life to be an oil company owner.
Keep in mind, the money made by the people in the oil industry, gets spent to other businesses, which pay employees, which spend money at other businesses... The problem, is when you get down to the level where those low skilled workers finally benefitting from that money, are not only getting all their tax withholdings back, but are also getting government handouts. That is the real problem. Government handouts must be curtailed.
100% agree.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#7717 Jun 28, 2013
Long story short, I think US oil being sold overseas is still contributing positively to the US economy. Importing inferior, toxic, cheap products from China, Indonesia, Mexico... is contributing negatively to the US economy.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#7718 Jun 28, 2013
Maybe before the Government tries to restrict law abiding citizens, they should crack down on violations and abuse by Government agencies under existing law first. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/28/us...
They "lose" weapons with no repercussions.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#7719 Jun 28, 2013
spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
If you get anymore friggen stupid with your righwingnuz idiocies your white trash head will surely explode – ye moronic retard! There are no socialist countries in Europe,
every country in Europe has private property rights and the means of production is primarily owned privately. The economy is almost entirely based on privately owned enteties! Clearly, you have not friggen clue want you’re babbling about!
Hey, fecal brain, you and libbies like you say how we have socialist programs (Social Security, O'bamacare) and that holds even a stronger view in Europe. I did not say "Socialist countries", I said "paid for socialism".
Try and keep up, sporko.

Poor Free Bagger

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#7720 Jun 28, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's $8 elsewhere.
Maybe you can force the people who own the oil to sell it cheaper than they can produce it, best of luck with that!
Liar.

Por Free Bagger
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7721 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? So the profits made by doing so, that pay the oil workers on up to the CEO, contribute to taxes paid by those oil workers on up to the CEO, and stimulate the economy with purchases made by those oil workers on up to the CEO, do not matter? I didn't mention the owners, because I'm sure in your eyes, since they get a tax break, the millions they pay in taxes are simply an insult.
Why do liberals have such tunnel vision?
So why do teabaggers whine about the price of fuel, when prices rise......and blame the president?

Then whine about we need to drill more to lower the price?

Only to export more.

All your teabagger rhetoric, about jobs, taxes, owners has NOTHING to do with lowering the price.

It's like a 5 year old whining because he gave away all his candy and now he doesn't have any.

Of course the teabagger will sell him back a piece for $5.00.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7722 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
That may be a valid point, but how do you get oil company owners to keep their oil here in the US where the goal is to decrease the profit on it? How do you make them keep it here, without violating their rights? The way I see it, if we want oil company owners to sacrifice their profit margin to be a do gooder, we should have taken the path in life to be an oil company owner.
Keep in mind, the money made by the people in the oil industry, gets spent to other businesses, which pay employees, which spend money at other businesses... The problem, is when you get down to the level where those low skilled workers finally benefitting from that money, are not only getting all their tax withholdings back, but are also getting government handouts. That is the real problem. Government handouts must be curtailed.
Violating their rights?

That ship sailed over a decade ago.

See: Un "Patriot" Act.

Are corporations "people" too?

"If we want oil company owners to sacrifice their profit margin to be a do gooder,"?

Really?

So all those commercials and advertising are false?

They seem so patriotic and humble in those.

Just wait until all our resources are used up and they move on to greener pastures.

Then the real hosing will take place.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7723 Jun 28, 2013
"Government handouts should be curtailed"?

I agree.

Earlier this month, the Facebook Inc. released its first “10-K” annual financial report since going public last year. Hidden in the report’s footnotes is an amazing admission: despite $1.1 billion in U.S. profits in 2012, Facebook did not pay even a dime in federal and state income taxes.

Instead, Facebook says it will receive net tax refunds totaling $429 million.

Facebook’s income tax refunds stem from the company’s use of a single tax break, the tax deductibility of executive stock options.

1)Exxon Mobil made $19 billion in profits in 2009. Exxon not only paid no federal income taxes, it actually received a $156 million rebate from the IRS, according to its SEC filings.

2) Bank of America received a $1.9 billion tax refund from the IRS last year, although it made $4.4 billion in profits and received a bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department of nearly $1 trillion.

3) Over the past five years, while General Electric made $26 billion in profits in the United States, it received a $4.1 billion refund from the IRS.

4) Chevron received a $19 million refund from the IRS last year after it made $10 billion in profits in 2009.

5) Boeing, which received a $30 billion contract from the Pentagon to build 179 airborne tankers, got a $124 million refund from the IRS last year.

6) Valero Energy, the 25th largest company in America with $68 billion in sales last year received a $157 million tax refund check from the IRS and, over the past three years, it received a $134 million tax break from the oil and gas manufacturing tax deduction.

7) Goldman Sachs in 2008 only paid 1.1 percent of its income in taxes even though it earned a profit of $2.3 billion and received an almost $800 billion from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury Department.

8) Citigroup last year made more than $4 billion in profits but paid no federal income taxes. It received a $2.5 trillion bailout from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury.

9) ConocoPhillips, the fifth largest oil company in the United States, made $16 billion in profits from 2007 through 2009, but received $451 million in tax breaks through the oil and gas manufacturing deduction.

10) Over the past five years, Carnival Cruise Lines made more than $11 billion in profits, but its federal income tax rate during those years was just 1.1 percent.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#7724 Jun 28, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>So why do teabaggers whine about the price of fuel, when prices rise......and blame the president?

Then whine about we need to drill more to lower the price?

Only to export more.

All your teabagger rhetoric, about jobs, taxes, owners has NOTHING to do with lowering the price.

It's like a 5 year old whining because he gave away all his candy and now he doesn't have any.

Of course the teabagger will sell him back a piece for $5.00.
It's all relative. Exporting oil is not the only reason fuel prices are so high. If Obama has "fixed the economy" like he said he would do, in one term no less, the fuel prices wouldn't be a big deal. Also if he had "fixed the economy" like he said he would, the value of the dollar would be greater, thus it would take fewer dollars to purchase a gallon of fuel.
Are you really this slow? Or do you play dumb to frustrate those you disagree with?

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#7725 Jun 28, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>Violating their rights?

That ship sailed over a decade ago.

See: Un "Patriot" Act.

Are corporations "people" too?

"If we want oil company owners to sacrifice their profit margin to be a do gooder,"?

Really?

So all those commercials and advertising are false?

They seem so patriotic and humble in those.

Just wait until all our resources are used up and they move on to greener pastures.

Then the real hosing will take place.
Yep, same old liberal talking points. Number one on the list, "it's Bush's fault".
Well, I'm no fan of the patriot act. Most conservatives agree. Now, the question is, why didn't Obama and the Democrats get rid of it? They had the opportunity.
Do you use Verizon? Lol

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#7726 Jun 28, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
"Government handouts should be curtailed"?

I agree.

Earlier this month, the Facebook Inc. released its first “10-K” annual financial report since going public last year. Hidden in the report’s footnotes is an amazing admission: despite $1.1 billion in U.S. profits in 2012, Facebook did not pay even a dime in federal and state income taxes.

Instead, Facebook says it will receive net tax refunds totaling $429 million.

FacebookÂ’s income tax refunds stem from the companyÂ’s use of a single tax break, the tax deductibility of executive stock options.

1)Exxon Mobil made $19 billion in profits in 2009. Exxon not only paid no federal income taxes, it actually received a $156 million rebate from the IRS, according to its SEC filings.

2) Bank of America received a $1.9 billion tax refund from the IRS last year, although it made $4.4 billion in profits and received a bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department of nearly $1 trillion.

3) Over the past five years, while General Electric made $26 billion in profits in the United States, it received a $4.1 billion refund from the IRS.

4) Chevron received a $19 million refund from the IRS last year after it made $10 billion in profits in 2009.

5) Boeing, which received a $30 billion contract from the Pentagon to build 179 airborne tankers, got a $124 million refund from the IRS last year.

6) Valero Energy, the 25th largest company in America with $68 billion in sales last year received a $157 million tax refund check from the IRS and, over the past three years, it received a $134 million tax break from the oil and gas manufacturing tax deduction.

7) Goldman Sachs in 2008 only paid 1.1 percent of its income in taxes even though it earned a profit of $2.3 billion and received an almost $800 billion from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury Department.

8) Citigroup last year made more than $4 billion in profits but paid no federal income taxes. It received a $2.5 trillion bailout from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury.

9) ConocoPhillips, the fifth largest oil company in the United States, made $16 billion in profits from 2007 through 2009, but received $451 million in tax breaks through the oil and gas manufacturing deduction.

10) Over the past five years, Carnival Cruise Lines made more than $11 billion in profits, but its federal income tax rate during those years was just 1.1 percent.
Ok, make them pay. But you take on the responsibility of taking care of all the people laid off as a result. Don't ask John Q Public to do it.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#7727 Jun 28, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
"Government handouts should be curtailed"?

I agree.

Earlier this month, the Facebook Inc. released its first “10-K” annual financial report since going public last year. Hidden in the report’s footnotes is an amazing admission: despite $1.1 billion in U.S. profits in 2012, Facebook did not pay even a dime in federal and state income taxes.

Instead, Facebook says it will receive net tax refunds totaling $429 million.

FacebookÂ’s income tax refunds stem from the companyÂ’s use of a single tax break, the tax deductibility of executive stock options.

1)Exxon Mobil made $19 billion in profits in 2009. Exxon not only paid no federal income taxes, it actually received a $156 million rebate from the IRS, according to its SEC filings.

2) Bank of America received a $1.9 billion tax refund from the IRS last year, although it made $4.4 billion in profits and received a bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department of nearly $1 trillion.

3) Over the past five years, while General Electric made $26 billion in profits in the United States, it received a $4.1 billion refund from the IRS.

4) Chevron received a $19 million refund from the IRS last year after it made $10 billion in profits in 2009.

5) Boeing, which received a $30 billion contract from the Pentagon to build 179 airborne tankers, got a $124 million refund from the IRS last year.

6) Valero Energy, the 25th largest company in America with $68 billion in sales last year received a $157 million tax refund check from the IRS and, over the past three years, it received a $134 million tax break from the oil and gas manufacturing tax deduction.

7) Goldman Sachs in 2008 only paid 1.1 percent of its income in taxes even though it earned a profit of $2.3 billion and received an almost $800 billion from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury Department.

8) Citigroup last year made more than $4 billion in profits but paid no federal income taxes. It received a $2.5 trillion bailout from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury.

9) ConocoPhillips, the fifth largest oil company in the United States, made $16 billion in profits from 2007 through 2009, but received $451 million in tax breaks through the oil and gas manufacturing deduction.

10) Over the past five years, Carnival Cruise Lines made more than $11 billion in profits, but its federal income tax rate during those years was just 1.1 percent.
Do you not understand that Corporation owners have to ALSO file personal tax returns? The corporation may get tax breaks. The owner, CEO, managers, and employees do not. They still pay taxes.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7728 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
It's all relative. Exporting oil is not the only reason fuel prices are so high. If Obama has "fixed the economy" like he said he would do, in one term no less, the fuel prices wouldn't be a big deal. Also if he had "fixed the economy" like he said he would, the value of the dollar would be greater, thus it would take fewer dollars to purchase a gallon of fuel.
Are you really this slow? Or do you play dumb to frustrate those you disagree with?
I was thinking the same about you.

"Fuel prices wouldn't be problem, if Obama fixed the economy"?

They wouldn't?

"In one term"?

If the teabagger congress would actually DO their job instead of naming post offices and voting for the 40th time to repeal AHCA, addressing everything and anything BUT JOBS, we MIGHT be in better shape.

18 MONTHS to work out an agreement before the sequester with a "super" committee to boot and.......... nothing.

As usual.

Isn't a surprise the teabagger congress favorability is 10%.

Poor teabagger.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7729 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, same old liberal talking points. Number one on the list, "it's Bush's fault".
Well, I'm no fan of the patriot act. Most conservatives agree. Now, the question is, why didn't Obama and the Democrats get rid of it? They had the opportunity.
Do you use Verizon? Lol
So.... Teabaggers want democrats to fix THEIR legislation?

Teabaggers were supporting and defending it for over a decade, until Obama was elected.

www.examiner.com/video/sean-hannity-then-and-... Cached

Teabaggers use talking points, their channel is dedicated to them.

(see above)

Those are facts.

Corporate welfare.

Poor teabagger.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7730 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, make them pay. But you take on the responsibility of taking care of all the people laid off as a result. Don't ask John Q Public to do it.
They wouldn't be laid off if they didn't get tax cuts for out sourcing jobs.

They should be penalized.

Or have tariffs placed on all THEIR imports.

Want to take advantage of our tax laws and economy while using cheap foreign labor?

You will PAY.

poor teabagger.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7731 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, make them pay. But you take on the responsibility of taking care of all the people laid off as a result. Don't ask John Q Public to do it.
John Q. Public DOES take care of it.

Michigan has given large tax breaks and subsidies to employers more often than any other state, according to a new report that tallies up state and local “megadeals,” or incentive packages worth more than $75 million.

Twenty-five of the packages involved relocations, 14 of them from one state to another. Florida this year, for example, awarded Hertz nearly $85 million in incentives to move from New Jersey to Estero, Fla. The remaining 11 deals involved relocations within a single state. For example, in 2011 Illinois gave Sears Roebuck $275 million to move its headquarters from downtown Chicago to a Chicago suburb instead of leaving the state.

All taxpayer funded.

When that's gone they scoot and look for the next sucker.

Poor teabagger.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#7732 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you not understand that Corporation owners have to ALSO file personal tax returns? The corporation may get tax breaks. The owner, CEO, managers, and employees do not. They still pay taxes.
They also have lawyers, accountants and offshore tax havens, taking their income in stock, etc.

Give me a break.

They end up paying a less percentage in income taxes, if at all. than the person that cleans their office.

Poor teabagger.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7733 Jun 28, 2013
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>You have just proven AGAIN that you really are clueless. I was being sarcastic in response to you droning.
Gosh, he wasn't able to discern the difference between your normal idiotic posts and sarcastic idiotic post.

His problem, eh?
spocko

Oakland, CA

#7734 Jun 28, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice wording. Is it still at that level of production? Are you taking about the levels reached before the moratorium? Or are you talking about the increase in production seen after the moratorium was lifted?
I suggest you get inform before make a insufferable idiot out of yourself!
http://blogs-images.forbes.com/energysource/f...

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#7735 Jun 28, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
They end up paying a less percentage in income taxes, if at all. than the person that cleans their office.
Poor teabagger.
Wow! He spoke a truth but forgot to take down his smoke and mirrors.

Let's say executive A gets a $500,000 salary and pays a pultry 5%(conservative number BTW. That's $25,000 in taxes.

While the cleaning staff employee B might get paid $25,000 (cleaning ain't rocket science afterall) and pays 9%(laughable because they likely pay no taxes because of the poverty line and will get a hefty tax refund). That's a mere $2,250!
Qusetion: Who paid more taxes? Remember, cleaner B may pay no taxes and get a refund beyond what they may have paid though the year.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Paxton's acceptance of shootings is unacceptable 9 hr youll shoot your ... 1
Texas mass shooting Nov 11 Canlendyou 13
News Massachusetts 1st to ban bump stocks since Vega... Nov 11 Watchdog 3
News Existing laws should have stopped shooter Nov 10 payme 1
News Texas Attorney General: The way to stop mass sh... Nov 9 Brenda Lasley 16
30-06 (7.62X63) vs .308 (7.62X51) (Feb '11) Nov 7 Charlie 122
News Packing pistols: Is Texas safer with more licen... (Jul '11) Nov 6 Free Farts 12
More from around the web