MSNBC's Alex Wagner Dismissed By Reporter After She Goes Political on D.C. Shooting

There are 247 comments on the NewsBusters.org story from Sep 16, 2013, titled MSNBC's Alex Wagner Dismissed By Reporter After She Goes Political on D.C. Shooting. In it, NewsBusters.org reports that:

Second Amendment foe Alex Wagner on Monday predictably attempted to use the tragic shooting at the Navy Yard in Washington D.C. to push for gun control.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NewsBusters.org.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#64 Sep 19, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like you have inside info. Care to name one of those bills? Every bill gets a bill number even in committee.
Do you on homework. You will retain it longer.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#65 Sep 19, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>You first.
Ya, I didn't think you knew either or you wouldn't answer a question with a question.
Dodge#1

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#66 Sep 19, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya, I didn't think you knew either or you wouldn't answer a question with a question.
Dodge#1
Keep trying.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#67 Sep 19, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Keep trying.
Dodge #2

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#68 Sep 19, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you on homework. You will retain it longer.
Translation - you make a claim you cannot support so you use the tried and true "look it up yourself" dodge.
Besara

Des Moines, IA

#69 Sep 19, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
The NRA is doing a fine job and dumbing down their sheeple like you. They have been crying since 2008 that "Obama and the democrats are going to take your guns"
How many bills have made it to the house or senate floor that called for removal of guns?
I'll give you a hint junior 0 X 0 =?
Speaking of that wonderful 2nd Amendment you do remember the OTHER part of the Amendment that contains the wording WELL REGULATED right?
So tell us what that "well regulated" part means and for whom does it apply.
Can do, douchenozzle?

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#70 Sep 19, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Translation - you make a claim you cannot support so you use the tried and true "look it up yourself" dodge.
If your claim to fame is immaturity you have proven yourself.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#71 Sep 19, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Translation - you make a claim you cannot support so you use the tried and true "look it up yourself" dodge.
Incorrect. Meaning it has been covered ad nauseum on these threads, and I am not going to waste my time trying to educate an ignorant ass such as yourself whose mind is already made up.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#72 Sep 19, 2013
Besara wrote:
<quoted text>So tell us what that "well regulated" part means and for whom does it apply.
Can do, douchenozzle?
LMAO douchenozzle is that the best playground insult you heard today on the playground skippy.

I'll do one better...since your alter ego was too chickenshyt to reply.

This is how the SCOTUS interpreted the "well regulated" provision and I agree.

The Court stated that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulation, such as concealed weapons prohibitions, limits on the rights of felons and the mentally ill, laws forbidding the carrying of weapons in certain locations, laws imposing conditions on commercial sales, and prohibitions on the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. It stated that this was not an exhaustive list of the regulatory measures that would be presumptively permissible under the Second Amendment.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#73 Sep 19, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Incorrect. Meaning it has been covered ad nauseum on these threads, and I am not going to waste my time trying to educate an ignorant ass such as yourself whose mind is already made up.
Fu@kin' A !

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#74 Sep 19, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>If your claim to fame is immaturity you have proven yourself.
If your is dodging direct questions you are in the hall of fame.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#75 Sep 19, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Incorrect. Meaning it has been covered ad nauseum on these threads, and I am not going to waste my time trying to educate an ignorant ass such as yourself whose mind is already made up.
Then you would have no problem showing where it was brought up seeing you claim it has been done so many times.

FAIL

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#76 Sep 19, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
"Military-style" weapon, "assault" weapon, etc. are simply invented terms by the anti-gun types to make them seem more menacing and deadly. ANY type of firearm can be considered a "military-style" weapon because they have ALL been used by the military at one point or another. Even short-barreled shotguns (which the SCOTUS incorrectly ruled had no militia use back in 1934) were used by the military. They were called "trench guns". Hell, Navy pilots used to be issued revolvers prior to going on missions just in case they got shot down being the lines. Are those "military-style" weapons, too???
Actually, all terms and words were invented.

We both know what we're talking about here. The latest tactic in the anti-gun agenda is to play up the use of "military-style" firearms in violence.

Even the President used that language during the Sandy Hook incident.

What they mean is anything that remotely looks like the current military standard, the M-14 and M-4.
Cat74

Barrington, IL

#77 Sep 19, 2013
If liberals had their way they would call your house, ask if you had guns, where they were kept, and send their Homeland Security Army right to your house, and grab them. Thank God there are not enough of them to try that, ever. Even ordinary Democrats have a respect for the 2nd amendment. Liberals, not so much.
yes

Santa Fe, NM

#78 Sep 19, 2013
Cat74 wrote:
send their Homeland Security Army right to your house, and grab them.
you are paranoid and insane
Cat74

Barrington, IL

#79 Sep 19, 2013
And you are so afraid of guns so you don't want anyone to have them. Thank God you don't have the political power to grab them. You are like a frightened child who needs Daddy Government to protect them. Me, not so much. I don't need Daddy Government for anything.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#80 Sep 20, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you would have no problem showing where it was brought up seeing you claim it has been done so many times.
FAIL
Go over to the thread titled "It's the guns, stupid" and start reading from post #1. Like I said....do you own homework. You will retain it longer.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#81 Sep 20, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<
This is how the SCOTUS interpreted the "well regulated" provision and I agree.

The Court stated that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulation, such as concealed weapons prohibitions, limits on the rights of felons and the mentally ill, laws forbidding the carrying of weapons in certain locations, laws imposing conditions on commercial sales, and prohibitions on the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. It stated that this was not an exhaustive list of the regulatory measures that would be presumptively permissible under the Second Amendment.
You lie. All communists are liars.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#82 Sep 20, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, all terms and words were invented.
We both know what we're talking about here. The latest tactic in the anti-gun agenda is to play up the use of "military-style" firearms in violence.
Even the President used that language during the Sandy Hook incident.
What they mean is anything that remotely looks like the current military standard, the M-14 and M-4.
And don't forget the always evil AK-47.
(the M-14 looks more like a Garand except that it uses a box mag.....not very evil looking. It's also my favorite rifle...wish I had one.)

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#83 Sep 20, 2013
Cat74 wrote:
If liberals had their way they would call your house, ask if you had guns, where they were kept, and send their Homeland Security Army right to your house, and grab them. Thank God there are not enough of them to try that, ever. Even ordinary Democrats have a respect for the 2nd amendment. Liberals, not so much.
Really....who told you that O'really, Glen Dumbeck, or Rush El dumbo?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News COD Offers Classes Promoting Firearm Safety thi... 18 hr Dr David 1
News No wedding for Bristol Palin Sun Tazo 9
Stop white on white crime May 20 Truth and Facts 30
News Concealed Carry Reduced Crime But NOT on Chicag... May 18 Truth and Facts 3
News Local Jews upset by Holocaust references in cam... (Jun '12) May 17 Robbie Siegmyer 115
News The Free Beacon Thinks Purchasing Ammunition Sh... May 17 JEFF1234 1
Democrats: Get A $2,000 Tax Credit For Turning ... May 10 Prep-for-Dep 22
More from around the web