Conservatives rip 'Guns & Ammo' magaz...

Conservatives rip 'Guns & Ammo' magazine for editorial supporting safety laws

There are 14 comments on the The Raw Story story from Nov 7, 2013, titled Conservatives rip 'Guns & Ammo' magazine for editorial supporting safety laws. In it, The Raw Story reports that:

Conservative media and readers are criticizing Guns & Ammo magazine for an upcoming editorial supporting firearm safety regulation, Ad Age reported on Wednesday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Raw Story.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1 Nov 7, 2013
Gun writer fired for piece questioning Second Amendmentís reach
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/...
SatanRules

Los Angeles, CA

#2 Nov 7, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Gun writer fired for piece questioning Second Amendmentís reach
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/...
yep, you morons don't like to face reality...supreme court will decide gun laws and interpret the constitution, not inbreds like you...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#3 Nov 7, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
yep, you morons don't like to face reality...supreme court will decide gun laws and interpret the constitution, not inbreds like you...
You mean like THIS?-

"...Next consider the intent of the banding and conspiring laid in the second count, which is alleged to be to intimidate, &c.. Nelson and Tillman, with the purpose to prevent their exercise of the right to keep and bear arms for a lawful purpos[e].

"The right to bear arms is also a right protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. Every citizen of the United States has the right to bear arms, provided it is done for a lawful purpose and in a lawful manner. A man who carries his arms openly, and for his own protection, or for any other lawful purpose, has as clear a right to do so as to carry his own watch or wear his own hat."--Circuit court of the United States fifth circuit and district of Louisiana, The United States vs. William J Cruikshank et al.[United States v. Cruikshank, 25 F. Cas. 707 (1 Woods, 308)(C.C.D. La. 1874)(No. 14,897), aff'd, 92 U.S. 542 (1876).]

"The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress. This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government, leaving the people to look for their protection against any violation by their fellow citizens of the rights it recognizes, to what is called, in The City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 139, the "powers which relate to merely municipal legislation, or what was, perhaps, more properly called internal police," "not surrendered or restrained" by the Constitution of the United States."--U.S. Supreme Court, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#4 Nov 7, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
yep, you morons don't like to face reality...supreme court will decide gun laws and interpret the constitution, not inbreds like you...
OR like THIS?-

"...Inasmuch as the Constitution provides a peaceable and regular mode whereby it or the U. S. laws may be amended, there can be no other rightful mode of effecting that end known either to the Constitution or law. As it is both the right and duty of every citizen to become fully informed upon all governmental affairs, so as to discharge his many political obligations intelligently at the ballot-box, and in other legitimate ways; and the freedom of the press and of speech are guaranteed to him for that as well as other essential purposes; and as the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition for the redress of grievances, and to keep and bear arms, cannot be lawfully abridged or infringed, it is evident that an assemblage for the mere purpose of procuring peaceable redress of supposed grievances cannot be treasonable; nor can a free and full discussion of the acts of public men or public measures, whether such discussion be in private conversations, public meetings or the press; nor can a military gathering when assembled for no purpose or design of interfering, by force or intimidation, with the lawful functions of the government or of its constituted authorities, or of preventing the execution of any law, or of extorting its alteration or repeal, or of overthrowing the lawful supremacy of the United States in any State of Territory...."-- CHARGE TO THE GRAND JURY BY THE COURT, JULY 10, 1861. PRESENT: HON. JOHN CATRON, An Associate Justice of Supreme Court of United States. HON. ROB'T W. WELLS, District Judge of United States for Western District of Missouri.[ ST. LOUIS: PRINTED AT THE DEMOCRAT BOOK AND JOB OFFICE 1861.]

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#5 Nov 7, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
yep, you morons don't like to face reality...supreme court will decide gun laws and interpret the constitution, not inbreds like you...
Or, do you mean like THIS?-

"...More especially, it cannot be believed that the large slaveholding States regarded them as included in the word citizens, or would have consented to a Constitution which might compel them to receive them in that character from another State. For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went...."

"...A reference to a few of the provisions of the Constitution will illustrate this proposition.

"For example, no one, we presume, will contend that Congress can make any law in a Territory respecting the establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people of the Territory peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for the redress of grievances.

"Nor can Congress deny to the people the right to keep and bear arms, nor the right to trial by jury, nor compel anyone to be a witness against himself in a criminal proceeding.

"These powers, and others in relation to rights of person which it is not necessary here to enumerate, are, in express and positive terms, denied to the General Government, and the rights of private property have been guarded with equal care."--Chief Justice Roger Taney, United States Supreme Court,[Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).]
SatanRules

Netherlands

#6 Nov 7, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Or, do you mean like THIS?-
"...More especially, it cannot be believed that the large slaveholding States regarded them as included in the word citizens, or would have consented to a Constitution which might compel them to receive them in that character from another State. For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went...."
"...A reference to a few of the provisions of the Constitution will illustrate this proposition.
"For example, no one, we presume, will contend that Congress can make any law in a Territory respecting the establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people of the Territory peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for the redress of grievances.
"Nor can Congress deny to the people the right to keep and bear arms, nor the right to trial by jury, nor compel anyone to be a witness against himself in a criminal proceeding.
"These powers, and others in relation to rights of person which it is not necessary here to enumerate, are, in express and positive terms, denied to the General Government, and the rights of private property have been guarded with equal care."--Chief Justice Roger Taney, United States Supreme Court,[Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).]
nah, I mean like this

http://www.sovereignman.com/wp-content/upload...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#7 Nov 11, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
nah, I mean like this
http://www.sovereignman.com/wp-content/upload...
"The Constitution is the highest authority, it appears, in California, and its provision are not to be disregarded with impunity. even by by the State itself. A jury of a Justice's Court in a rural district decided that the State law prohibiting persons from carrying concealed weapons is unconstitutional, because the Constitution of the United States says that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and the county Judge sustained the decision."--Public Ledger, Memphis, Tennessee, Monday Evening, August 02, 1869. Vol. VIII. No. 133. Pg. 2.
PrinceofDarkness

Sydney, Australia

#8 Nov 11, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Constitution is the highest authority, it appears, in California, and its provision are not to be disregarded with impunity. even by by the State itself. A jury of a Justice's Court in a rural district decided that the State law prohibiting persons from carrying concealed weapons is unconstitutional, because the Constitution of the United States says that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and the county Judge sustained the decision."--Public Ledger, Memphis, Tennessee, Monday Evening, August 02, 1869. Vol. VIII. No. 133. Pg. 2.
http://www.sovereignman.com/wp-content/upload...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#9 Nov 11, 2013
PrinceofDarkness wrote:
"But we do believe in a body of free citizens ready and sufficient to take care of themselves and of the governments which they have set up to serve them. In our constitutions themselves we have commanded that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," and our confidence has been that our safety in times of danger would lie in the rising of the nation to take care of itself, as the farmers rose at Lexington."

- President Woodrow Wilson, Message in the opening of the 64th Congress.[The Democratic Banner, Mt. Vernon, Ohio, December 10, 1915.--No. 99. Pg. 9.]

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#10 Nov 12, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
nah, I mean like this
http://www.sovereignman.com/wp-content/upload...
Take a hike, communist pos.
PrinceofDarkness

Atlanta, GA

#11 Nov 12, 2013
Tory II wrote:
<quoted text>Take a hike, communist pos.
http://imageshack.us/a/img834/5681/cocki.jpg

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#12 Nov 12, 2013
PrinceofDarkness wrote:
"Stupid is as stupid does" and man you do STUPID with the best of 'em.

I looked up the word "stupid" in the dictionary and the definition was accompanied by your picture.

Now put your helmet back on and get back in your padded cell before one of the orderlies notices that you chewed through the restraining straps and got out again.

Have fun storming the castle.........
PrinceofDarkness

Dallas, TX

#13 Nov 12, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>"Stupid is as stupid does" and man you do STUPID with the best of 'em.
I looked up the word "stupid" in the dictionary and the definition was accompanied by your picture.
Now put your helmet back on and get back in your padded cell before one of the orderlies notices that you chewed through the restraining straps and got out again.
Have fun storming the castle.........
as you were moron

http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Masturbation...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#14 Nov 12, 2013
PrinceofDarkness wrote:
<quoted text>
as you were moron
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Masturbation...
DEMONRAT DREAMS:

"The Revolution found the negro in America a slave. Where are the acts or constitutions which have declared him a citizen, entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States? They have no existence. He is everywhere inferior to the white man, as well by the laws of the States as of the United States. In the State of Massachusetts, always foremost in the work of liberty, the free negro is under considerable disabilities--one of which is, that he is not enrolled in the militia. If he comes into that State from another, he must show a certificate from the Secretary of State of his freedom, or he will be seized and deported. In Delaware free negroes convicted of larceny may be sold. If one of them comes into that State from another, he forfeits ten dollars per week for the time of his stay, and if he does not pay the penalty he is sold. In Virginia the free negro has no political, and very few civil rights. He is forbidden to come into that State; and if he does come, he is seized and removed. In Ohio he is not permitted to vote, and in North Carolina, although he is allowed the right of suffrage, yet he, and his posterity to the third generation, are refused the privilege of giving testimony in a court of justice, where a white man is a party. By the laws of the United States the negro is refused the privilege of being naturalized; and in the code adopted for the government of this District,(which is the laws of the adjacent States,) it is provided that, on the trial of a free negro for a crime a slave may be a witness; that a free negro may not marry a white woman; that it is criminal to employ him, unless he has a certificate of registry; that he may not keep or carry arms, and is punishable for lifting his hand against a white man; and by the law incorporating the City of Washington, passed by this present Congress, a colored servant is made liable to be punished by stripes for a breach of the ordinances of the city."--Mr. A. Smyth, of Virginia, Saturday, December 9, 1820. Missouri--Citizenship of Free Persons of Color. U.S. House of Representatives.

[ABRIDGMENT OF THE DEBATES OF CONGRESS, FROM 1789 TO 1856. FROM GALES AND SEATON'S ANNALS OF CONGRESS; FROM THEIR REGISTER OF DEBATES; AND FROM THE OFFICIAL REPORTED DEBATES. BY JOHN C. RIVES. BY THE AUTHOR OF THE THIRTY YEARS' VIEW. VOL. VII. NEW YORK: D. APPLETON & COMPANY, 346 & 348 BROADWAY. 1858. Pg. 80]

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Should they teach this in schools? Aug 14 okimar 3
News FPC Vows Legal Action on Approved California As... Aug 4 jimwildrickjr 1
News WVa AG: Manchin Should Resign Dem Leadership Role Aug 4 JohnInLa 3
News The NRA And The Worst Ad You May Ever See Jul 31 Red Crosse 185
History of the .233 Remington Jul 31 SummerBB8 1
News Heidi Harris: CCW's On The Rise Jul 29 Get Out 2
News Country singer Scotty McCreery cited for Jul 25 Been There Done That 4
More from around the web