Local News: Smarr, GA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Wie chases unlikely leaders - Hawaii Sports

Posted in the Golfers Forum

Comments (Page 4)

Showing posts 61 - 80 of80
|
next page >
Go to last post| Jump to page:
GOLFER

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Jul 14, 2009
 
THE TRUTH wrote:
GOLFERS! & TIGER CHEERLEADERS!- Imagine Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th? Would there be any doubt that if Tiger did that he would be the G.O.A.T. Greatest-Of-All-Time! CHECK OUT THIS STAT! Former ATP record holder Pete Sampras won his first major at the age of 19 and 49 majors later at age 31 won his record 14th major. Tiger won his first major at the age of 21 and 50 majors later at the age of 33 has 14 majors. Mr. ROGER FEDERER won his first major at the age of 21 and 25 majors later at the age of 27 has 15 majors and THE ALL TIME MAJORS RECORD IN HIS SPORT! So Tiger=14/50 Pete=14/49 Roger=15/25 Majors ever since they won there first. Can any of you TIGER CHEEERLEADERS spot the STAND OUT? Comparing Apples to apples Roger to Pete, as you can see Roger Federer won an all time ATP record 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras to win his previous record of 14. That's like Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th! How dominant is that? Finally, Tiger being 14/50=28%, Pete being 14/49=28.5%, Roger being 15/25=60% DOMINANT! As you can see Pete Sampras and Tiger are wining majors at about the same rate where Roger Federer is wining majors 2X as fast! Finally, for you TIGER CHEERLEADERS that say Tiger will eventually get his 19th major? I say how many more majors do you think Mr. Federer will have by then? NO! Roger doesn't have a unique name in the sportsworld that everyone knows or a golf last name like Woods! NO! Roger is not African American and does not stand out like a Black Sheep, but SO WHAT!- By the way Roger won his first major 6 years and 25 majors after Tiger won his first and now that you have seen Tiger FAIL to win his 2nd U.S. Open in a row you might want to watch Tiger in New York as he watches his buddy Roger Federe in ENVY try to win his U.S. Open for a record 6th year in a row and try to capture his 16th Major! NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
Wow! I didn't know Roger Federer was som dominant! No Wonder Tiger watches him!
M Wie Suxx

Aiea, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Jul 18, 2009
 
Wie the loser.
NIKE

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
Jul 22, 2009
 
THE TRUTH wrote:
GOLFERS! & TIGER CHEERLEADERS!- Imagine Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th? Would there be any doubt that if Tiger did that he would be the G.O.A.T. Greatest-Of-All-Time! CHECK OUT THIS STAT! Former ATP record holder Pete Sampras won his first major at the age of 19 and 49 majors later at age 31 won his record 14th major. Tiger won his first major at the age of 21 and 50 majors later at the age of 33 has 14 majors. Mr. ROGER FEDERER won his first major at the age of 21 and 25 majors later at the age of 27 has 15 majors and THE ALL TIME MAJORS RECORD IN HIS SPORT! So Tiger=14/50 Pete=14/49 Roger=15/25 Majors ever since they won there first. Can any of you TIGER CHEEERLEADERS spot the STAND OUT? Comparing Apples to apples Roger to Pete, as you can see Roger Federer won an all time ATP record 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras to win his previous record of 14. That's like Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th! How dominant is that? Finally, Tiger being 14/50=28%, Pete being 14/49=28.5%, Roger being 15/25=60% DOMINANT! As you can see Pete Sampras and Tiger are wining majors at about the same rate where Roger Federer is wining majors 2X as fast! Finally, for you TIGER CHEERLEADERS that say Tiger will eventually get his 19th major? I say how many more majors do you think Mr. Federer will have by then? NO! Roger doesn't have a unique name in the sportsworld that everyone knows or a golf last name like Woods! NO! Roger is not African American and does not stand out like a Black Sheep, but SO WHAT!- By the way Roger won his first major 6 years and 25 majors after Tiger won his first and now that you have seen Tiger FAIL to win his 2nd U.S. Open in a row you might want to watch Tiger in New York as he watches his buddy Roger Federe in ENVY try to win his U.S. Open for a record 6th year in a row and try to capture his 16th Major! NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
That's impressive!
alice

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Jul 23, 2009
 

Judged:

6

6

6

wie do not care wrote:
wie will choke. mark my word. it runs in the family, just ask BJ.
That is spot on hon!
ohgoody

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Jul 23, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

alice wrote:
<quoted text>
That is spot on hon!
Alice you are just jealous! You are a know it all do nothing. I say ship you off to Vidor, Texas.
Perhaps you can take up outdoor sports in Vidor.
THE GOAT

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Jul 23, 2009
 
THE TRUTH wrote:
GOLFERS! & TIGER CHEERLEADERS!- Imagine Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th? Would there be any doubt that if Tiger did that he would be the G.O.A.T. Greatest-Of-All-Time! CHECK OUT THIS STAT! Former ATP record holder Pete Sampras won his first major at the age of 19 and 49 majors later at age 31 won his record 14th major. Tiger won his first major at the age of 21 and 50 majors later at the age of 33 has 14 majors. Mr. ROGER FEDERER won his first major at the age of 21 and 25 majors later at the age of 27 has 15 majors and THE ALL TIME MAJORS RECORD IN HIS SPORT! So Tiger=14/50 Pete=14/49 Roger=15/25 Majors ever since they won there first. Can any of you TIGER CHEEERLEADERS spot the STAND OUT? Comparing Apples to apples Roger to Pete, as you can see Roger Federer won an all time ATP record 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras to win his previous record of 14. That's like Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th! How dominant is that? Finally, Tiger being 14/50=28%, Pete being 14/49=28.5%, Roger being 15/25=60% DOMINANT! As you can see Pete Sampras and Tiger are wining majors at about the same rate where Roger Federer is wining majors 2X as fast! Finally, for you TIGER CHEERLEADERS that say Tiger will eventually get his 19th major? I say how many more majors do you think Mr. Federer will have by then? NO! Roger doesn't have a unique name in the sportsworld that everyone knows or a golf last name like Woods! NO! Roger is not African American and does not stand out like a Black Sheep, but SO WHAT!- By the way Roger won his first major 6 years and 25 majors after Tiger won his first and now that you have seen Tiger FAIL to win his 2nd U.S. Open in a row you might want to watch Tiger in New York as he watches his buddy Roger Federe in ENVY try to win his U.S. Open for a record 6th year in a row and try to capture his 16th Major! NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
Wow! Roger Federer is the G.O.A.T. Greatest Of All Time and he won his 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras and Tiger Woods to win 14. AMAZINGLY DOMINANT!
Bunnymouth

Mesa, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Jul 23, 2009
 
Mmmmm....girl got that puty little bunnymouth....mmm...that could be mighty good.
IMAGINE

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Jul 24, 2009
 
THE TRUTH wrote:
GOLFERS! & TIGER CHEERLEADERS!- Imagine Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th? Would there be any doubt that if Tiger did that he would be the G.O.A.T. Greatest-Of-All-Time! CHECK OUT THIS STAT! Former ATP record holder Pete Sampras won his first major at the age of 19 and 49 majors later at age 31 won his record 14th major. Tiger won his first major at the age of 21 and 50 majors later at the age of 33 has 14 majors. Mr. ROGER FEDERER won his first major at the age of 21 and 25 majors later at the age of 27 has 15 majors and THE ALL TIME MAJORS RECORD IN HIS SPORT! So Tiger=14/50 Pete=14/49 Roger=15/25 Majors ever since they won there first. Can any of you TIGER CHEEERLEADERS spot the STAND OUT? Comparing Apples to apples Roger to Pete, as you can see Roger Federer won an all time ATP record 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras to win his previous record of 14. That's like Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th! How dominant is that? Finally, Tiger being 14/50=28%, Pete being 14/49=28.5%, Roger being 15/25=60% DOMINANT! As you can see Pete Sampras and Tiger are wining majors at about the same rate where Roger Federer is wining majors 2X as fast! Finally, for you TIGER CHEERLEADERS that say Tiger will eventually get his 19th major? I say how many more majors do you think Mr. Federer will have by then? NO! Roger doesn't have a unique name in the sportsworld that everyone knows or a golf last name like Woods! NO! Roger is not African American and does not stand out like a Black Sheep, but SO WHAT!- By the way Roger won his first major 6 years and 25 majors after Tiger won his first and now that you have seen Tiger FAIL to win his 2nd U.S. Open in a row you might want to watch Tiger in New York as he watches his buddy Roger Federe in ENVY try to win his U.S. Open for a record 6th year in a row and try to capture his 16th Major! NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
Wow! Roger is more dominant than Tiger. How come the media doesn't tell the truth?
LOL

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Jul 24, 2009
 
IMAGINE wrote:
<quoted text>Wow! Roger is more dominant than Tiger. How come the media doesn't tell the truth?
Because it's boring.
True American

Mililani, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Jul 24, 2009
 
LOL wrote:
<quoted text>
Because it's boring.
Well I don't really see or hear about him enough to really know whether he's boring or not... but I do know that Tiger is known 'worldwide', but can't say that about Federor. Federor is only known in the Tennis circles, that's it.

Just the facts Ma'am///lol
LOL

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Jul 24, 2009
 
True American wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I don't really see or hear about him enough to really know whether he's boring or not... but I do know that Tiger is known 'worldwide', but can't say that about Federor. Federor is only known in the Tennis circles, that's it.
Just the facts Ma'am///lol
That's the reason you don't hear about him/tennis. There's no appeal outside tennis circles. Media covers more interesting things, like Tiger's feats.
THE PRESS

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#89
Jul 24, 2009
 
THE TRUTH wrote:
GOLFERS! & TIGER CHEERLEADERS!- Imagine Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th? Would there be any doubt that if Tiger did that he would be the G.O.A.T. Greatest-Of-All-Time! CHECK OUT THIS STAT! Former ATP record holder Pete Sampras won his first major at the age of 19 and 49 majors later at age 31 won his record 14th major. Tiger won his first major at the age of 21 and 50 majors later at the age of 33 has 14 majors. Mr. ROGER FEDERER won his first major at the age of 21 and 25 majors later at the age of 27 has 15 majors and THE ALL TIME MAJORS RECORD IN HIS SPORT! So Tiger=14/50 Pete=14/49 Roger=15/25 Majors ever since they won there first. Can any of you TIGER CHEEERLEADERS spot the STAND OUT? Comparing Apples to apples Roger to Pete, as you can see Roger Federer won an all time ATP record 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras to win his previous record of 14. That's like Tiger wining his 19th major in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th! How dominant is that? Finally, Tiger being 14/50=28%, Pete being 14/49=28.5%, Roger being 15/25=60% DOMINANT! As you can see Pete Sampras and Tiger are wining majors at about the same rate where Roger Federer is wining majors 2X as fast! Finally, for you TIGER CHEERLEADERS that say Tiger will eventually get his 19th major? I say how many more majors do you think Mr. Federer will have by then? NO! Roger doesn't have a unique name in the sportsworld that everyone knows or a golf last name like Woods! NO! Roger is not African American and does not stand out like a Black Sheep, but SO WHAT!- By the way Roger won his first major 6 years and 25 majors after Tiger won his first and now that you have seen Tiger FAIL to win his 2nd U.S. Open in a row you might want to watch Tiger in New York as he watches his buddy Roger Federe in ENVY try to win his U.S. Open for a record 6th year in a row and try to capture his 16th Major! NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
The reason is that Roger is not African American, he doesn't have a unique name like Tiger or a golf last name like woods, and he doesn't stick out like a Black Sheep. JUST THINK! If Tiger American age 27 played tennis and won 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras to win 14 and if Roger Swiss age 33 and played golf and was 5 majors away from the all tie PGA majors record who do you think would still get all the HYPE! Tiger would in fact he would get a lot more hype because Tiger is American only age 27 and is THE ALL TIME MAJORS LEADER in his sport and won 15 ATP majors in 1/2 the time it took former ATP record holder Pete Sampras to win 14. I REST MY CASE.
True American

Mililani, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#90
Jul 24, 2009
 
I'm sorry but tennis is why Federor is not known world-wide. You can go down any street in america or the world and ask a hundred random people who Tiger and Federor are, and 99 of them will know Tiger, but less than 50 will know who the hell Federor is... and out of the less than 50 that say they've heard of Federor, 30 of them will think you're asking about Fedor...
Golf Nut

Aiea, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#91
Jul 25, 2009
 
Wie tied for 23rd at 3-under 213 in the LPGA event in France.

Gee...is this even f&^&ing news worthy? Tied a TWENTY THIRD PLACE. Wow...the excitement is building.

Wie suxs...hard...really hard....

“s'up”

Since: Sep 07

Davis, CA now King City, CA

ISP: Salinas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#92
Jul 25, 2009
 
Golf Nut wrote:
Wie tied for 23rd at 3-under 213 in the LPGA event in France.
Gee...is this even f&^&ing news worthy? Tied a TWENTY THIRD PLACE. Wow...the excitement is building.
Wie suxs...hard...really hard....
Indeed, considering that Wie is now registered as a resident of Florida.
16 Majors Wow

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#93
Jul 27, 2009
 
TIGER CHEERLEADERS! Now that you have seen Tiger FAIL at wining his 2nd U.S. Open in a row in 2009, you might want to watch Tiger in New York as he watches his buddy ROGER FEDERER in ENVY try to win his 6th U.S. Open in a row and try to capture his 16th Major and he is still only age 27.

“s'up”

Since: Sep 07

Davis, CA now King City, CA

ISP: Marina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#94
Jul 27, 2009
 
16 Majors Wow wrote:
TIGER CHEERLEADERS! Now that you have seen Tiger FAIL at wining his 2nd U.S. Open in a row in 2009, you might want to watch Tiger in New York as he watches his buddy ROGER FEDERER in ENVY try to win his 6th U.S. Open in a row and try to capture his 16th Major and he is still only age 27.
You are still comparing Golf and Tennis? Go back to jousting at windmills.
16 Majors Wow

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95
Jul 27, 2009
 
Golfers, Sportswriters, and TIGER CHEERLEADERS! How dominant would Tiger be if he won 19 majors in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his record 18th major? Comparing Golfer to golfer! Now let's compare Tennis player to tennis player! Former all time ATP majors leader Pete Sampras won his first major at the age of 19 and 49 majors later at the age of 31 got his record 14th major. That is until ROGER FEDERER won his first major at the age of 21 and 25 majors later at the age of 27 got a new ATP record of 15 majors. So PETE=14/49, and ROGER=15/25 from there first major won to there last major played. As you can see, Roger won 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete to win his previous record of 14. That's comparing Tennis Player to tennis player. Now can you imagine if Tiger won 19 majors in 1/2 the time it took Jack Nicklaus to win his 18 majors? Now comparing Apples to apples & Oranges to oranges as you can see ROGER FEDERER STANDS ALONE and is more DOMINANT in his sport of tennis than Tiger is in golf. So how about Tiger you ask? Tiger won his first major at the age of 21 and 51 PGA majors later at the age of 33 has 14 majors. So PETE=14/49, TIGER=14/51, and ROGER=15/25! Can any of you TIGER CHEERLEADERS see the STAND OUT? You tell me who is wining 15 majors in 1/2 the time it took Pete Sampras and Tiger Woods to win 14 majors? Maybe now you TIGER CHEERLEADERS have learned something?
True American

Mililani, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#96
Jul 29, 2009
 
@ RFed wannabee...
name the top twenty men's tennis players in the world and we'll see what kind of compettion Federor is up against... for that matter, name the top 'ten' men, and we'll see if any of them are even known in their own states...lmao
16 Majors Wow

Chino Hills, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97
Jul 30, 2009
 
True American wrote:
@ RFed wannabee...
name the top twenty men's tennis players in the world and we'll see what kind of compettion Federor is up against... for that matter, name the top 'ten' men, and we'll see if any of them are even known in their own states...lmao
True American! Just because Roger doesn't play SWIMSUIT MODELS like John Daly that have won majors on the PGA Tour and guys who are eligible for SOCIAL SECURITY like Tom Watson who kicked Tiger's butt! Let's look at Tiger's closest competition Phil lefty Mickelson and Roger's closest competition Rafael lefty Nadel! Now tell me who looks like an ATHLETE in there MALE MOJO PRIME and who looks like THE LOCAL MAIL MAN who eats at HOMETOWN BUFFET and is closer to SOCIAL SECURITY? Go ahead TRUE AMERICAN TELL ME! Now tell me who has made it to 3 finals in majors and won 2 of them and who is 0/3 this year and MISS THE CUT at his last major TRUE AMERICAN TELL ME!
Sign up to receive email when someone responds
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 61 - 80 of80
|
next page >
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Install the Topix Community Toolbar

Never miss another reply to your comments, no matter where you are on the web.

Daily Horoscope for January 5

Capricorn

You must assert your intentions more clearly and stand by the ambitions that you've set for yourself. Your home will be the theatre of profound changes and it will be necessary to handle them with a cool head. You could make the acquaintance of someone who will upset your current views and opinions. Some deep breathing and mild exercise is what you need now.

Get your Horoscope »