AT&T rolls out 4G network | The Colum...

AT&T rolls out 4G network | The Columbus Dispatch

There are 13 comments on the Columbus Dispatch story from Feb 19, 2011, titled AT&T rolls out 4G network | The Columbus Dispatch. In it, Columbus Dispatch reports that:

Central Ohio became a 4G site yesterday, with AT&T Ohio officials announcing the arrival of the high-speed wireless network to Columbus and surrounding communities.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Columbus Dispatch.

mlw

Canal Winchester, OH

#1 Feb 19, 2011
Don't know why they are calling it 4G. Sysrem falls short of what 4G is specified to do. Obviously 4G is just a marketing term .
DRB

Westerville, OH

#2 Feb 19, 2011
So Verizon, T-Mobile and Clearwire/Sprint all have 4G networks in Columbus and have been on air for anywhere between 1 month and 4 months, but that is not a big deal? I guess only when ATT sends out a press release does anything actually get noticed. ATT's network is HSPA 7.2 which is slower than any of the other 3 networks. And wow, 60 sites??? Hmm, that's less than half of what Verizon and T-Mobile and Clearwire have. If this is such a big deal, why did The Dispatch not make this type of annoucement when the other companies launched their "4G" networks.

Since: Jun 10

Canal Winchester, OH

#3 Feb 19, 2011
The big question?
Do they want to build a pricing structure and an equipment structure that is usable to the real world?
Cell/Smart phones aren't being designed to replace the advantages of the landline phone. They could be.
It looks as if marketing and the techies have their focus on something other than what the consumer really needs. The consumer doesn't use the "WOW" factor. They use communications - convenient and flexible.
Cell/Smart phones don't fill the convenient and flexible requirement.
Sam

Columbus, OH

#4 Feb 19, 2011
Meh, Clear, Verizon, Sprint, & T-Mobile have had their '4G' networks in Columbus for a bit now. And unlike T-Mobile & AT&T's '4G' network that is really just a slight upgrade of current technology, Clear & Verizon's '4G' are entirely new technologies (WiMax & LTE respectively), and are both faster than HSPA+(AT&Ts & T-Mobile's '4G'). Sprint uses Clear's network.

So, if VZW, Sprint, & T-Mo have already been serving Columbus with '4G', that makes AT&T last in the game to rollout '4G'.
josh7234

Tampa, FL

#6 Feb 19, 2011
this 4g thing att is deploying is that there hspa+ or is the lte because hspa+ isnt really 4g,while lte isnt either its much closer and a software upgrade to lte can turn it into lte advanced thus supposedly being 4g
Linda

Galloway, OH

#7 Feb 19, 2011
Remember Corona Mass Ejection.
Smart Person

United States

#8 Feb 19, 2011
Verizon puts 5.5 billion a year into its network annually.
HATEATT

Columbus, OH

#9 Feb 19, 2011
ATT 3G is junk - 4G? Really?
line up kiddies

Reynoldsburg, OH

#10 Feb 19, 2011
Faster, smarter identity theft! LOL
Obozo the Clown

Fremont, CA

#11 Feb 19, 2011
AT&T is the devil.
Glass House

Columbus, OH

#12 Feb 28, 2011
Sam wrote:
Meh, Clear, Verizon, Sprint, & T-Mobile have had their '4G' networks in Columbus for a bit now. And unlike T-Mobile & AT&T's '4G' network that is really just a slight upgrade of current technology, Clear & Verizon's '4G' are entirely new technologies (WiMax & LTE respectively), and are both faster than HSPA+(AT&Ts & T-Mobile's '4G'). Sprint uses Clear's network.
So, if VZW, Sprint, & T-Mo have already been serving Columbus with '4G', that makes AT&T last in the game to rollout '4G'.
Yes, Verizon is immediately going to LTE, but currently have no phone available that can utilize it. So with no phone, doesn't that make Verizon the last to the 4G game?

AT&T is on a migration plan from HSPA+ to LTE which is software only changes in their network. AT&T LTE rollout is also occurring in 2011. T-mobile has no HSPA+ migration to LTE scheduled, but will eventually transition to LTE as well. However, T-Mobile's plans for using HSPA+ will also make speeds competitive to LTE.

The "slight upgrade" is more of a comparison of the past CDMA technologies that Sprint and Verizon used and had to abandon to become competitive in the high speed wireless market. HSPA, HSPA+, LTE are more of a steady migration path so the huge upgrade isn't necessary with AT&T and T-Mobile.
The Informed

Springboro, OH

#13 Feb 28, 2011
mlw wrote:
Don't know why they are calling it 4G. Sysrem falls short of what 4G is specified to do. Obviously 4G is just a marketing term .
They are calling it 4g because it is substantially faster and can be built upon to meet the IEEE standard for 4G. Every technology out there is falls short of 4g. True 4G is at least a year or 2 away.
kpp

Vestal, NY

#14 Feb 28, 2011
Well I put mine on edge, from 3G and get better service . Even better than wifi occasionally

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bluetooth Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Lenovo launches Lemon 3 with decent specs and a... Jan 14 monijain 1
How to transfer music between Bluetooth devices. (Sep '06) Jan 14 monijain 55
Nexus 'text to switch speaker phone' hands free... (Jan '09) Dec '15 col 29
News Google honours Hedy Lamarr, inventor of technol... Nov '15 Linda 1
Help find a lost bluetooth device (Oct '06) Oct '15 melvinjj788 10
News 'MagicStick' Launched: The New-Gen PC on Stick.... Oct '15 George Michael 1
Bluetooth dropouts (Aug '15) Aug '15 Rob Somerville 1
More from around the web