Antidepressants and pregnancy: New review finds a risk
Controversial new research suggests that women suffering depression should stay away from antidepressants while pregnant.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at USA Today.
#1 Oct 31, 2012
Antidepressant use during pregnancy has long been a controversial issue. Some women are intimated by the side effects that could cause harm to their pregnancy and babies, while some are actually also daunted by the potential risks of untreated depression. It actually helps to be aware, and to take a cautious mindset regarding depression and treatment especially when it involves antidepressants. There are articles featured at http://www.zoloftlawsuitcenter.net/zoloft-and... that may be of good use to those who are concerned and interested.
Since: Oct 12
#2 Oct 31, 2012
Common misconceptions about psychiatry
Psychiatry remains a subject of numerous misconceptions concerning both the illness and the patients. This fact has contributed to surrounding the field of psychiatry by a vague cloud of illusions that have misled many about the reality of things. Here are 12 of these most common misconceptions:
All psychiatric patients are mad
Psychiatric patients are possessed
Psychiatric disorders are a divine punishment
A psychiatric patient is weak
Psychiatric patients should live in psychiatric wards
Psychiatric patients should not get married
Psychiatry is not a medical science
Psychiatric illness does not affect the body
Psychiatric disorders are not related to a brain dysfunction
Psychiatric treatments harm the body
Psychiatric treatments make you infertile
Psychiatric treatments are addictive
To know more visit my website: www.psychiatryinlebanon.com
#3 Oct 31, 2012
I remain on the cautious side, and weight risk & benefits.
#4 Nov 1, 2012
There is no science to psychiatry. No medical model. No evidence based medicine. No test for chemical imbalance of the brain.(APA admitted in 2007 to lying about chemical imbalance to drug the population)
Psychiatry: An industry of death
Psychiatry No Science
Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness
Every so often Al Frances says something that seems to surprise even him. Just now, for instance, in the predawn darkness of his comfortable, rambling home in Carmel, California, he has broken off his exercise routine to declare that “there is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.” Then an odd, reflective look crosses his face, as if he’s taking in the strangeness of this scene: Allen Frances, lead editor of the fourth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (universally known as the DSM-IV), the guy who wrote the book on mental illness, confessing that “these concepts are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the boundaries.” For the first time in two days, the conversation comes to an awkward halt.
Pasted from < http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/12/ff_dsmv... ;
There are no genetic tests, no brain scans, blood tests, chemical imbalance tests or X-rays that can scientifically/medically prove that any psychiatric disorder is a medical condition.
#5 Nov 1, 2012
Psychiatric Diagnosis: Too Little Science, Too Many Conflicts of Interest [i]
Paula J. Caplan, Ph.D.
There is a lot of pain and suffering in the world, and it is tempting to believe that the mental health community knows how to help. It is widely believed, both by mental health professionals and the general population, that if only a person gets the right psychiatric diagnosis, the therapist will know what kind of measures will be the most helpful. Unfortunately, that is not usually the case, and getting a psychiatric diagnosis can often create more problems than it solves, including a lifetime of being labeled, difficulties with obtaining affordable (or any) health insurance (due to now having a pre-existing condition), loss of employment, loss of child custody, the overlooking of physical illnesses and injuries because of everything being attributed to psychological factors, and the loss of the right to make decisions about one’s medical and legal affairs. The creation and use of psychiatric diagnosis, unlike, for instance, psychiatric drugs, is not overseen by any regulatory body, and rarely does anyone raise the question of what role the assignment of a psychiatric label has played in creating problems for individuals.[ii]
The Problematic History
These serious limitations have not prevented the authors of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), sometimes known as “the therapist’s Bible,” from making expansive claims about their knowledge and authority and wielding enormous power to decide who will and will not be called mentally ill and what the varieties of alleged mental illness will be. The DSM’s current edition is called DSM-IV-TR, and it was preceded by the original DSM (in 1952), then DSM-II (1968), DSM-III (1980), DSM-III-R (Third Edition Revised)(1987), DSM-IV (1994), and DSM-IV-TR (2000). The DSM-V is currently in preparation and slated for 2013 publication. Each time a new edition appears, the media ask whichever psychiatrist is the lead editor why a new edition was necessary, and like clockwork, each editor replies that it was because the previous edition really wasn’t scientific (Caplan, 1995). And each time a new edition appears, it contains many more categories than does the previous one. For instance, DSM-III-R contained 297 categories, and DSM-IV contained 374 (Caplan, 1995).
I served as an advisor to two of the DSM-IV committees, before resigning due to serious concerns after witnessing how fast and loose they play with the scientific research related to diagnosis (Caplan, 1995). The DSM is widely used, not only in the mental health system, but also in general medical practice, in schools, and in the courts. I have been involved since 1985 in trying to alert both therapists and the public to the manual’s unscientific nature and the dangers that believing in its objectivity poses. Since then, I have watched with interest a national trend toward gradually increasing openness to the idea that psychiatric diagnosis (A)is largely unscientific,(B)is highly subjective and political, and (C)can cause untold harm, ranging from the patients’ lowered self-confidence to loss of custody of children to loss of health insurance (because any psychiatric label can be considered evidence of a pre-existing condition) to loss of the right to make decisions about their medical and legal affairs.
More of this article:
#6 Nov 1, 2012
Why your kid is drugged in school
How it works:
The State Department of Education gets monies from the Federal Government (Disability) under a program called "IDEA" for each child diagnosed with a disability. A disability could be ADD/ADHD, Bi-polar disorder, Depression or any of the other mental diagnoses.
Who profits: The State Department of Education, the mental health and counseling Industry, the Pharmaceutical company and the money that is kicked back by lobbyists for politicians special interest and of course the legal profession.
All this at the cost of your child's Health and welfare.
----------IDEA" Final Regulation (part 1 of 2)
300.7 Child with a disability.
(1) As used in this part, the term child with a disability means a child evaluated in accordance with §§300.530-300.536 as having mental retardation, a hearing impairment including deafness, a speech or language impairment, a visual impairment including blindness, serious emotional disturbance (hereafter referred to as emotional disturbance), an orthopedic impairment, autism, traumatic brain injury, an other health impairment, a specific learning disability, deaf-blindness, or multiple disabilities, and who, by reason thereof, needs special education and related services.(i) The term means a condition exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics over a long period of time and to a marked degree that adversely affects a child's educational performance:(A) An inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual, sensory, or health factors.(B) An inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers.(C) Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal circumstances.(D) A general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression.(E) A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with personal or school problems.(ii) The term includes schizophrenia. The term does not apply to children who are socially maladjusted, unless it is determined that they have an emotional disturbance. 9) Other health impairment means having limited strength, vitality or alertness, including a heightened alertness to environmental stimuli, that results in limited alertness with respect to the educational environment, that-(i) Is due to chronic or acute health problems such as asthma, attention deficit disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, diabetes, epilepsy, a heart condition, hemophilia, lead poisoning, leukemia, nephritis, rheumatic fever, and sickle cell anemia; and (ii) Adversely affects a child's educational performance §300.24 Related services.(a) General. As used in this part, the term related services means transportation and such developmental, corrective, and other supportive services as are required to assist a child with a disability.(9) Psychological services includes-(i) Administering psychological and educational tests, and other assessment procedures; (ii) Interpreting assessment results; (iii) Obtaining, integrating, and interpreting information about child behavior and conditions relating to learning; (iv) Consulting with other staff members in planning school programs to meet the special needs of children as indicated by psychological tests, interviews, and behavioral evaluations; (v) Planning and managing a program of psychological services, including psychological counseling for children and parents; and (vi) Assisting in developing positive behavioral intervention strategies.---------
#7 Nov 1, 2012
Protect you children and love ones against the Mental Health Industry.
#8 Nov 1, 2012
Allen Frances: Is Government Intervention Needed to Prevent an Unsafe DSM 5?
#9 Nov 4, 2012
Psychiatrixsters will either get onboard to help treat the masses or they can find another damn job...Its that simple.
All the syndromes are actual infections sharing their genes in prion synergy in the neurons to perpetuate their genes caused by using spirochetal infected cells for vaccine use for over 30yrs.
They KNEW what caused the real AIDS and they lied about them all on the premise that criminal antibody tests would find infections and that those same antibodies would prove PROTECTION...LOL
Meet the real AIDS of prion protein spriochetal infections---
Failure to now treat the truth--if you know how to treat the real AIDS---will now be considered criminal by treating with JUST JUNK...
Good Luck fellers!!! Hope you don't herx too many to death with your stupid!
#10 Sep 24, 2013
I have ordered 2 times from this website PILLSMEDSHOP. COM . I called yesterday the customer care and asked for a discount as i was about to order twice the regular amount.
Add your comments below
|Greg W Murray Colehamer (May '10)||Dec 2||AA RON||10|
|Is there any 'ghetto' in Sudbury?? (Apr '08)||Nov '17||Dylan Mutty||38|
|Here's A List Of Historic Victories Democrats H...||Nov '17||el rey de los cam...||9|
|Many homes for sale near Fort Devens Sudbury Tr... (Jul '08)||Nov '17||MAnMAn||2|
|Police: Heroin sold out of van for special need...||Nov '17||cathleen more||1|
|Review: Chinese Tui Na Massage (Dec '09)||Nov '17||Youknoit617||3|
|Bolton call firefighter charged in Lancaster, M... (May '15)||Oct '17||Peaches||12|
Find what you want!
Search Framingham Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC