all law enforcement and politicians. Now that's funny, because I would have bet that you would have insisted on holding their ***** and aiming it into the cup and shaking afterwards.<quoted text>
I don't fink anyone should be tested.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Berkshire Eagle.
#22 Mar 30, 2011
#23 Mar 30, 2011
At weast I don't hold it when hard and shoot it down my gullet wike yew.
#24 Mar 30, 2011
Seems to me that if nobody has anything to hide, why not make random drug testing for all public employees mandatory -- teachers, courthouse personnel, administrative personnel, cops, judges, prosecutors, politicians, Selectmen, librarians, Pittsfield DPW workers, everyone on the public teat.
Plus test for all the commonly-used controlled substances in the community: marijuana, cocaine, anabolic steroids, methamphetamines, etc.
Especially since the public is now being forced to subsidize everyone's health care and treatment of everyone's future medical problems.
If the public employee doesn't agree to be tested, let the person find work in the private sector where drug testing is common.
Now THAT would simplify things!
#25 Mar 30, 2011
For a stalker and criminal like you, this is cheap talk.
Add your comments below
|Student freaks out over seeing Rebel flag||Jun 19||Borderguard||1|
|Ted Nugent Suggests He's Ready For Armed Revolt... (Jan '13)||Jun 15||Sorosing On||27|
|Bolton call firefighter charged in Lancaster, M... (May '15)||Jun 14||civil servant sup...||4|
|Hallmark Job Opportunity in Framingham||Jun 2||VictorOrians||1|
|Hillary Clinton can't stop talking about Donald...||May 28||JUST SAYIN||4|
|Review: A Aria Bridal & Formal Inc (Feb '10)||May '17||Un satisfied cust...||28|
|Overprinting error on $1 note is obvious, but...||May '17||Vernon Peterson||1|
Find what you want!
Search Framingham Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC