Sacramento: Do your job

Sacramento: Do your job

There are 5 comments on the Vallejo Times-Herald story from May 6, 2009, titled Sacramento: Do your job. In it, Vallejo Times-Herald reports that:

Here we are, once again approaching an election where we are being asked to cast our votes for or against hopelessly complex issues, the results of which will be hard-wired into our state's constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Vallejo Times-Herald.

Since: Apr 09

Clovis, CA

#1 May 6, 2009
Agreed on all counts. Those of us in the "middle class" that pay taxes through the nose so others may be recipients of social services are once again, getting the shaft. I am voting NO on everything this time around.

The privately held company i work for just laid off 50% of it's staff to "trim the fat" so that the company may survive another year. I suggest big government do the same.

Everyday I see tax dollars being wasted. Whether it is in the form of 7 (yes SEVEN) city employees standing around while one works (to paint a freakin fire hydrant), or bums panhandling on the streets for "extra" change for "something to eat" while I pay for their food stamps, methadone clinics and shelters. I am sick to death of spineless leadership and bleeding heart liberals making bad choices for the tax payer.

vote a big fat NO!!!!
Illegal Mexican

San Francisco, CA

#2 May 6, 2009
OK brain surgeons, vote no and lose a lot more cops and firemen. I am not saying it is cops and firmen fault, your Gov is taking it out on public safety to scare everyone. Too bad the State can just stop spending billions on Illegals.
just the truth

Hayward, CA

#3 May 6, 2009
We could lose all the whining firefighters and police who have caused the financial meltdown of Vallejo and more cities to come. Who cares about those selfish brutes? That is the first thing the Governor talked about, losing firefighters and teachers, I say, good riddance.

Get their salaries in line with what we the taxpayers can afford.
WALL-E

Vallejo, CA

#4 May 7, 2009
I agree. These props are really confusing. I don't trust the little paragraphs on the sample ballot. Everything is wording tricky now. Is there a unbias website that would give the pro's and con's of these props?
shonuf

Oakland, CA

#5 May 7, 2009
vote no on all but one

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Shaun Hill Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News NFL: Patterson shines, Vikings crush Rams (Sep '14) Sep '14 Spielman 7
News Claiming Case Keenum Is A Savvy Move By St. Lou... (Sep '14) Sep '14 OBriens Butt-Chin 1
News Lions' offensive line's worst nightmare: Viking... (Sep '12) Oct '12 Aromofart 2
News More uproar about replacement officials (Sep '12) Sep '12 Ed Hochuloogie 7
News Kellen Moore Shows Some Improvement In Lions' S... (Aug '12) Aug '12 Terry Appell 1
News LinkedIn's IPO priced at $45 a share (May '11) May '11 Robert Gutierrez 1
News Should the Lions Sign JaMarcus Russell? (Jun '10) Feb '11 RAIDER MISTERIO OG 15
More from around the web