Favre concerned 10-1 Packers may be too 'loose'

Advancing age might not be entirely to blame for those gray streaks in Brett Favre's hair. Read more
First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Max PACK Fan

United States

#1 Nov 26, 2007
These Packers have to finish games by not letting up on the opponent. Detroit's fourth quarter scoring showed the Packers were over confident at that point, just as they were in the Bears game they lost.

The team is young enough to play every minute as if it is their final minute to win, ie: all out all the time.

Since: Apr 07

San Ramon, Ca

#2 Nov 26, 2007
i agree. the def. gets qway to laxed way to quick. if t wasnt for an offenseve explosion we would not be ahead by so much to begfin with

“Go Pack Go”

Since: Jun 07

Stevens Point, Wisconsin

#3 Nov 26, 2007
Max PACK Fan wrote:
These Packers have to finish games by not letting up on the opponent. Detroit's fourth quarter scoring showed the Packers were over confident at that point, just as they were in the Bears game they lost.
The team is young enough to play every minute as if it is their final minute to win, ie: all out all the time.
I agree, they have to play for 60 minutes, every game, on every down. You have to remember though, in Detroit, Woodson, Rouse, and KGB were out with injuries. I think the backups did OK, but Bush is no Woodson. If Woodson is out this week, I am sure MM will have Bush ready.

Since: Apr 07

San Ramon, Ca

#4 Nov 26, 2007
Proball5 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree, they have to play for 60 minutes, every game, on every down. You have to remember though, in Detroit, Woodson, Rouse, and KGB were out with injuries. I think the backups did OK, but Bush is no Woodson. If Woodson is out this week, I am sure MM will have Bush ready.
I hope so. I couldnt believe it how many key injuries we had. it sucks. it could be a foreshadow for us stomping dallas in the playoffs with a full roster.
ed b

North Royalton, OH

#5 Nov 26, 2007
the pack is back....
Yan S

Appleton, WI

#6 Nov 26, 2007
Here too worried about come backs by other teams.
But the D's injuries are also a good point.

However, there have been all to many close games this season. Including that overtime game and the game against the Redskins just the week before.
Those two were not beginning of the season we're still learning games.

Since: Dec 06

Georgetown, Texas

#7 Nov 27, 2007
you guys sound a little worried. That's OK I am too, should be a great match up. Go Cowboys!
Jason

Rockford, IL

#8 Nov 27, 2007
look the packers out match the boys hands down & cowboys fans should worry cause romo to TO isnt going to work in this game and who else do they got?

exactly, no one, cowboys running game is as bad as the packs and id say now or the last 3 weeks its been better then dallas in the ground game & even if the injuries come into play we will still take down dallas in dalls
eric

Marshfield, WI

#9 Nov 27, 2007
as wierd as this may sound,maybe a great season this year is a bad thing for the rookies.They wont appreciate it as much as going through some bad seasons.Most of these guys never lost,highschool, college,and now the pros and they are winning.

Like I said, We need a killer finisher.We need to play 60 min and end to end destroy.
BlackTar

United States

#10 Nov 27, 2007
Jason wrote:
look the packers out match the boys hands down & cowboys fans should worry cause romo to TO isnt going to work in this game and who else do they got?
exactly, no one, cowboys running game is as bad as the packs and id say now or the last 3 weeks its been better then dallas in the ground game & even if the injuries come into play we will still take down dallas in dalls
Wow i hope so :) yo uahve inspired me :)

Since: Dec 06

Georgetown, Texas

#11 Nov 27, 2007
Jason wrote:
look the packers out match the boys hands down & cowboys fans should worry cause romo to TO isnt going to work in this game and who else do they got?
exactly, no one, cowboys running game is as bad as the packs and id say now or the last 3 weeks its been better then dallas in the ground game & even if the injuries come into play we will still take down dallas in dalls
Lets see "who else do they got"?

Jason witten 3rd in NFL for receiving and 5th in TD's for TE's

Dallas is 11th in rushing yards per game, Green bay is 32nd

Total Defense Cowboys 7th packers 12th
Total Ofense Cowboys 2nd packers 3rd

So instead of talking smack that always comes back to haunt you take a better look at this match up. You should be worried, very worried.
eaglesnut

Chicago, IL

#12 Nov 27, 2007
Great young defense the Pack has this year. Green Bay played us in the first game of the year, and you could see they were going to be a vastly improved team. Favre does need a good solid #1 reciever, Jennings is good, but they really miss not getting Moss. With that said, I wish the Pack nothing but the best of luck. Beat those stinkin COWGIRLS!

“Go Pack Go”

Since: Jun 07

Stevens Point, Wisconsin

#13 Nov 27, 2007
crimeguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets see "who else do they got"?
Jason witten 3rd in NFL for receiving and 5th in TD's for TE's
Dallas is 11th in rushing yards per game, Green bay is 32nd
Total Defense Cowboys 7th packers 12th
Total Ofense Cowboys 2nd packers 3rd
So instead of talking smack that always comes back to haunt you take a better look at this match up. You should be worried, very worried.
Who have you played so far this year? The combined record of the teams we have DEFEATED is 52-58. The combined record of the teams Dallas has defeated is 43-67.
So go beat some good teams before you start talking smack, sit down and get ready for the game of the year. We don't intend on traveling to Dallas and losing.
BlackTar

United States

#14 Nov 27, 2007
Proball5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Who have you played so far this year? The combined record of the teams we have DEFEATED is 52-58. The combined record of the teams Dallas has defeated is 43-67.
So go beat some good teams before you start talking smack, sit down and get ready for the game of the year. We don't intend on traveling to Dallas and losing.
to go with that 12 of those are from one team. minus those from the total and its a lot more one sided. the patriots had and have more wins then 4 or 5 of the teams you guys played.

“Go Pack Go”

Since: Jun 07

Stevens Point, Wisconsin

#15 Nov 27, 2007
BlackTar wrote:
<quoted text>to go with that 12 of those are from one team. minus those from the total and its a lot more one sided. the patriots had and have more wins then 4 or 5 of the teams you guys played.
No BT, I took the losses out Pats and Bears.
BlackTar

United States

#16 Nov 27, 2007
also i think you may be 2nd off. but your 3rd in passing off. which is the oly thing you can compare in the season at this point. what rushing have you had in the last 5 games since we got ours? well ill tell you that grant has beat out both of your rusher indef. except one game which i think grant still won but barber had 103yds.
so if you want to talk total off. okay thats lopsided if you alredy named us last for rushing. we are second for passing and our RB grant has out performed both of yours in the last 5 games since his start. and were avg. i think 100yds a game or a little under in the last 5 weeks. how about you somewhere around low 70's

Since: Dec 06

Georgetown, Texas

#17 Nov 27, 2007
Proball5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Who have you played so far this year? The combined record of the teams we have DEFEATED is 52-58. The combined record of the teams Dallas has defeated is 43-67.
So go beat some good teams before you start talking smack, sit down and get ready for the game of the year. We don't intend on traveling to Dallas and losing.
Me talking smack I was the one just stating facts LOL.

Doesn't sound like your fudge packers are beating some power houses there. At least the Cowboys only loss came against the best team in the NFL. What's the Bears record who the Boys spanked 34 - 10 but your lucky team couldn't beat them at home. Let's see Farvera has how many wins at Texas Stadium? GOOSE EGG!

Now that I think about it I retract my earlier post giving packers some respect they don't deserve it.

Since: Dec 06

Georgetown, Texas

#18 Nov 27, 2007
BlackTar wrote:
<quoted text>to go with that 12 of those are from one team. minus those from the total and its a lot more one sided. the patriots had and have more wins then 4 or 5 of the teams you guys played.
And wha'ts this "we" stuff you coming to Texas to play too???? LOLOLOLOLOL

“Go Pack Go”

Since: Jun 07

Stevens Point, Wisconsin

#19 Nov 27, 2007
crimeguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Me talking smack I was the one just stating facts LOL.
Doesn't sound like your fudge packers are beating some power houses there. At least the Cowboys only loss came against the best team in the NFL. What's the Bears record who the Boys spanked 34 - 10 but your lucky team couldn't beat them at home. Let's see Farvera has how many wins at Texas Stadium? GOOSE EGG!

Now that I think about it I retract my earlier post giving packers some respect they don't deserve it.
Another loud mouth bozo, thank God we only have to put up with his crap until Thursday night. Then he will never show up again. Typical :My Dad's bigger than your Dad" crap spewer. And by the way, your haven't faced the best team in the NFL yet..........
BlackTar

United States

#20 Nov 27, 2007
crimeguy wrote:
<quoted text>
And wha'ts this "we" stuff you coming to Texas to play too???? LOLOLOLOLOL
wrong post. i didnt use we in that one. looking smart. You dont have to come and play to talk in we. you idiot. if y0u played the texans and someone asked you who won wuld you reply the dallas cowoys won or we won implying that you are connected with the team. you need to relize that we can simulate a emotional connection to something. WE doesnt mean and in no way is restricted to the thinking of physical interaction with the we that is associated.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Scott Wells Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Packers snap up Jeff Saturday to replace Wells (Mar '12) Mar '12 packrat 4
News Green Bay Packers Scheduled Meeting With Center... (Mar '12) Mar '12 GBPfan 5
News Neal suspension underscores Packers draft needs... (Mar '12) Mar '12 GBPfan 24
News Three-and-out: Packers' free agency outlook (Mar '12) Mar '12 Randy 4
News Pro Football Focus On The Packers Guards and Ce... (Feb '12) Feb '12 Norman mack 4
News Chattanooga paying family of man shot at 59 tim... (Jan '12) Jan '12 civillain 1
News Pack facing tough offseason questions (Jan '12) Jan '12 eric 9
More from around the web