Barkley's success may depend on how Eagles coach him
#1 Apr 28, 2013
From the article:
"At the very least, this pick should speed up the departure of Michael Vick. Hanging on to the 33-year-old turnover machine makes even less sense after adding Barkley to the mix."
Too funny! I actually hope kelly is dopey enough to start the dog killer and place the Eagle's hopes for success on someone as unintelligent as vick. Placing the convict in an offensive scheme which involves a smart QB, able to make instantaneous decisions that will make or break the success of a productive series, isn't the brightest thing to do.
If kelly is ignorant enough to place the success or failure of the Eagles on the intelligence and skills of the felon, he isn't as smart as Lurie thought he was.
Personally, I'd like to see vick flush the Eagles down the toilet just one more time before he goes out. It'll add to his "legacy".
#2 Apr 28, 2013
WTF?? How smart could Lauire be?? He was the one who signed the Sociopath to begin with..and the Vickster took the Eagles down the toilet (so predicatable)..a couple of the worst seasons for the once proud Eagles..but of course if you listen to the Vickster..it was everyone else's fault..I only hope that Kelly is dumb enough to play the Vickster..nothing would make me happier than to see the Vickster's head rollong down the field..what a sight that would be!!
#3 Apr 28, 2013
"How smart could Lauire be??"
Here's the hypocrisy yet again. First of all, it's "Lurie". And I'll bet he knows how to spell "predictable" and the really tough one... "rolling". You really should stop questioning other people's intelligence until you raise the level of your own.
And you know, I thought D Day was just busting your chops when he said you "swung from con-vick-t's sack", but just look at how you didn't say a word since his last post, then you show up an hour after his most recent one. Pathetic.
#4 Apr 28, 2013
Well aren't you just the "spelling queen"?
BTW, why in the world would my sack be so on your mind? Is the real jdi starting to reveal "her"self? You might want to think about what obsessing over other men's sacks infers about you.
What's that.......did the closet door just slam? LMGDAO
#5 Apr 29, 2013
You know I've said this 1000 times... I couldn't care less about spelling. I'm just pointing out the ongoing hypocrisy. Someone who can't even spell "rolling" shouldn't be calling anyone stupid. Think you can retain this info this time ?
And as long as we're on the subject of hypocrisy, shall I start linking all your post where you've made reference to sacks ? It seems to be one of your favorite words when you're not telling other people they must be gay for saying it.
Add your comments below
|NFL dynasties disappeared; could Seahawks be one?||Aug '14||Flatulence Fred||4|
|Brady Quinn: Manziel needs to tone act down||Aug '14||Flatulence Fred||11|
|Seattle dominates Denver 43-8 (Feb '14)||Jul '14||Dave||10|
|Tom Brady is Better Looking than Peyton Manning||Jun '14||Quasi Moto||1|
|Russell Wilson is now Seahawks' third-highest p...||Apr '14||Aerosmith||5|
|Minnesota Vikings 2014 draft preview: Quarterback||Apr '14||Laughing Bear Fan||5|
|Can Eagles Replicate Super Bowl Winning Recipe? (Feb '14)||Feb '14||Sheldon||1|
Find what you want!
Search Russell Wilson Forum Now