Local News: Dominican Republic 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Crennel stands by Anderson

Full story: Akron Beacon Journal

CLEVELAND: When a more-than-successful Browns season had concluded Sunday, an emotional Romeo Crennel answered simply when asked if he thought of letting Brady Quinn play the second half.

Read All 15 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 15 of15
terje

Big Sky, MT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Dec 30, 2007
 
this article's headline could have easily read "anderson breaks hand in meaningless game" had that x-ray shown a break.

it was completely asinine to risk anderson. for what? some bogus pride??? how about a little common sense for romeo and pat. anderson is a good qb and deserves praise. he also deserves a shot at a playoff game if the colts win. what a waste it would have been had anderson been knocked out with a serious injury. i'm not sure romeo and mcmanamon see that. anderson should have sat the rest of the game.
steeler geo

Massillon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Dec 30, 2007
 
goodbye clownies..your season ends tonight

losers

go steelers!
Not A Browns Fan

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Dec 30, 2007
 
steeler geo wrote:
goodbye clownies..your season ends tonight
losers
go steelers!
"Go Steelers" huh?

To the showers. Your overated a$$es got your clocks THOROUGHLY CLEANED, which has been the story of this crock of a team the entire second half.

But thanks for checking in, 12-year old. It's past your bedtime.
Frank Costanza

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Dec 30, 2007
 
Let's face the facts here: Crennel would still be standing by Charlie Frey and Maurice Carthon if he had HIS way.
Browns follower

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Dec 30, 2007
 
I am from Boston and relocated in ohio. I followed the Browns all year. I am a huge Pats fan. However, i would never go on a dolphins, bills, or jets newspaper website and talk crap. I believe we beat thr crap out of you guys like 30-13. So steeler geo and not a browns fan get a life and grow up. By the way the Steelers are the most overrated team in the league. Who was the Steelers best win this year? You guys say the Browns suck so it must not be them. What is the steelers combined record against playoff teams?

How about Jags 27 Steelers 13
QuinnIStheFUTURE

Massillon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Dec 31, 2007
 
Patrick McManamon - your an idiot.

ANDERSON CHOKED WHEN IT MATTERED AND THREW 4 TERRIBLE PICKS VS. A BENGALS DEFENSE THAT HAD 3 ROOKIES STARTING.

This game didn't matter at all. Your a soft moron.
Brian Sipe

Largo, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Dec 31, 2007
 
If Crennel were so confident in Anderson he would have played Quinn. But he is afraid Quinn will outshine Anderson and create a problem at QB. Crennel is one of the worst judges of talent in the league. Let's hope the front office is smarter and find a way to get a couple of picks for a 6th round QB who had a lucky year against a weak schedule - and choked in the games that mattered the most (Pitt. and Cincy).
Solaker

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Dec 31, 2007
 
Brian Sipe wrote:
If Crennel were so confident in Anderson he would have played Quinn. But he is afraid Quinn will outshine Anderson and create a problem at QB. Crennel is one of the worst judges of talent in the league. Let's hope the front office is smarter and find a way to get a couple of picks for a 6th round QB who had a lucky year against a weak schedule - and choked in the games that mattered the most (Pitt. and Cincy).
Right on. Derek Anderson did a creditable job, but McManamon's comment that we would have had to "outscore" our playoff opponent is a prediction of how it would have ended up. Derek had a couple of big number games that came to an end in St. Louis in Week 8. The Oakland, Arizona, Cincinnati and, arguably, New England games all followed the same pattern: Browns were put in a double-digit hole in the first half by Derek Anderson turnovers on poor throws (and, in Arizona, a muffed snap from the center). We lost the Cincinnati game--and the playoffs--because he threw horrible picks on three successive series, two that turned a 6-0 game into a 19-0 game just before the half and then on first and goal on the opening drive of the second half. Quinn sat out because Crennel is "uncomfortable" with a quarterback controvery, and for no other conceivable reason. Maybe Anderson is the better guy, but Quinn deserves a chance to show whether, unlike Anderson, he would IMPROVE over the season and not deteriorate. Quinn was deliberately held out at the beginning of the season and thus has never been given a fair chance to compete. That was right for this year, perhaps, but starting next year with a presumption that it's Anderson's job is garbage. If they do that, they might as well trade Quinn for what they can get: he's better than any of the Round 1 quarterbacks in this draft.
Spirit of Reagan

Redwood City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Dec 31, 2007
 
Solaker wrote:
<quoted text>
Right on. Derek Anderson did a creditable job, but McManamon's comment that we would have had to "outscore" our playoff opponent is a prediction of how it would have ended up. Derek had a couple of big number games that came to an end in St. Louis in Week 8. The Oakland, Arizona, Cincinnati and, arguably, New England games all followed the same pattern: Browns were put in a double-digit hole in the first half by Derek Anderson turnovers on poor throws (and, in Arizona, a muffed snap from the center). We lost the Cincinnati game--and the playoffs--because he threw horrible picks on three successive series, two that turned a 6-0 game into a 19-0 game just before the half and then on first and goal on the opening drive of the second half. Quinn sat out because Crennel is "uncomfortable" with a quarterback controvery, and for no other conceivable reason. Maybe Anderson is the better guy, but Quinn deserves a chance to show whether, unlike Anderson, he would IMPROVE over the season and not deteriorate. Quinn was deliberately held out at the beginning of the season and thus has never been given a fair chance to compete. That was right for this year, perhaps, but starting next year with a presumption that it's Anderson's job is garbage. If they do that, they might as well trade Quinn for what they can get: he's better than any of the Round 1 quarterbacks in this draft.
There is a reason Quinn was dropping like a rock on draft day. DA had a great year for a 24 yr old in his first full season of starting. Compare that to other young qb's. He should improve quite a bit during the offseason and into next year.

Since: Aug 07

Evans, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Dec 31, 2007
 
After this last game, I've started thinking that maybe the Browns might be better off getting their draft picks for DA and rolling the dice with Quinn. I'm not saying that just because of all of the interceptions in the last two games. It's because of Anderson's reaction to competition. He obviously seems to be a better QB than Frye, but he was so busy worrying about Charlie that he couldn't win the starting spot from him.
Now jump to these last two games this season - just about the time folks start talking about what the Browns should do at the QB position next year - and he's throwing at everyone except his receivers.
But the straw that really broke this camel's back was what happened after he hurt his hand in this last game. He pouted. At least that's the way it looked on TV. He came back out to the sidelines after his X-rays and saw Quinn there. Quinn wasn't pulled off the field right away, so Anderson put on his helmet and pouted.
Again, that's just the way it looked on TV. But if that perception is correct then I would rather they just get what they can for him now. Let's face it, the real key to that offense is the line anyways.
Bruno Sart

Ft Mitchell, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Dec 31, 2007
 
Now that the O-line is top-notch, with the $30+ million in cap room the Browns will have (per Peter King), they must re-sign Jamal Lewis and revamp the D-line. Phil Savage is the first GM we've had in ages, going back to pre-expansion days, that understands that the only way you win is from the lines back. Once the D-line issues are addressed, this team will really take off, even with the nasty 2008 schedule. By tasting the bitter pill of no playoffs, this team already has a chip on its shoulder, which is great to see.
Lyle Alzado

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Dec 31, 2007
 
Spirit of Reagan wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a reason Quinn was dropping like a rock on draft day. DA had a great year for a 24 yr old in his first full season of starting. Compare that to other young qb's. He should improve quite a bit during the offseason and into next year.
Much like your hero, your memory is faulty. Anderson did not play well in the big games. He is nothing more than a good back-up. If the Browns put their eggs in his basket, we'll need a new QB after next year while Quinn is starring somewhere else. By the way, Quinn dropped because other teams had different needs.
Lyle Alzado

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Dec 31, 2007
 
Great post, Silent Bob. Good insights and I agree with you completeley. Consider how well Quinn has handled all of this. A true leader.
SilentBob wrote:
After this last game, I've started thinking that maybe the Browns might be better off getting their draft picks for DA and rolling the dice with Quinn. I'm not saying that just because of all of the interceptions in the last two games. It's because of Anderson's reaction to competition. He obviously seems to be a better QB than Frye, but he was so busy worrying about Charlie that he couldn't win the starting spot from him.
Now jump to these last two games this season - just about the time folks start talking about what the Browns should do at the QB position next year - and he's throwing at everyone except his receivers.
But the straw that really broke this camel's back was what happened after he hurt his hand in this last game. He pouted. At least that's the way it looked on TV. He came back out to the sidelines after his X-rays and saw Quinn there. Quinn wasn't pulled off the field right away, so Anderson put on his helmet and pouted.
Again, that's just the way it looked on TV. But if that perception is correct then I would rather they just get what they can for him now. Let's face it, the real key to that offense is the line anyways.
Guy Caballero

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Jan 1, 2008
 
Spirit of Reagan wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a reason Quinn was dropping like a rock on draft day. DA had a great year for a 24 yr old in his first full season of starting. Compare that to other young qb's. He should improve quite a bit during the offseason and into next year.

Probably the same "reason" that nobody drafted Tom Brady until the sixth round, huh? Don't act like you know more than anybody else.
Bill

Painesville, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jan 8, 2008
 
Maybe Savage could show some savvy and convince Parcells that Crennel is the coach for Miami. Then they can make it look like the trade was Parcell's idea ...
Brian Sipe wrote:
If Crennel were so confident in Anderson he would have played Quinn. But he is afraid Quinn will outshine Anderson and create a problem at QB. Crennel is one of the worst judges of talent in the league. Let's hope the front office is smarter and find a way to get a couple of picks for a 6th round QB who had a lucky year against a weak schedule - and choked in the games that mattered the most (Pitt. and Cincy).
Would you like us to alert you when someone adds a comment?
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 1 - 15 of15
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Install the Topix Community Toolbar

Never miss another reply to your comments, no matter where you are on the web.

Daily Horoscope for January 4

Scorpio

Don't give anything away for free that you could be making money on, Scorpio and that includes your own intellectual property. You may not realize it, but your opinion is worth a lot over these next few days. The Virgo Moon has the ability to sharpen your powers of observation to an incisive edge. When all is said and done, your greatest glory will have probably been in dragging the team after you on your crusade, whether they were willing to go or not.

Get your Horoscope »