No sir, YOU are the one who implied , no make that outright stated, that everyone who feels he served his time "supports what he did". I merely turned the table on you. If we can't have our opinion with you ASSUMING what we believe, why should you deserve that privilege ?<quoted text>
So let me understand you correctly. You state that other peoples opinions who feel he has paid his dues are valid, but mine and others opinion that he has not is invalid. Gee thanks. How big of you. Hypocrite much?
I don't deny that there is abuse in dog racing. It exists in horse racing too. But it is minimal in comparison to dog fighting, where there is zero oversight.
ASPCA, god love 'em for their work, are like PETA in some ways. They are a bit extreme and tend to over-exaggerate. A few instances and they make it out like it is rampant through out the sport. Which it is not. Again I speak from personal knowledge through my SIL who has worked on dog and horse racing farms as part of her career. Her life's work has been all about animals.
As to my location, what is it to you? I have the option to not disclose my location in my posts. Others do that as well. Do you take up your displeasure with them? For the record I am in Annapolis. A drinking town, with a sailing problem.
As far as the ASPCA website being an over-exaggeration, I'll be willing to look at any site you can offer that proves it's not as bad as they say it is. No offense, but your word of mouth explanation doesn't cut it for me. I like proof.
Based on your number of posts, I'm sure you know that people with hidden locations are frequently another person posting in the same thread. Sometimes taking pleasure in arguing both sides of the topic. It's just a credibility thing, nothing more.