Apr 4, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger
Full story: The Charlotte Observer![]()
Comments
|
They're not going to find an answer in the draft. That's not to say they shouldn't draft a WR in the first round, to include packaging some of those 10 picks to move way up from 29 to take Crabtree or Maclin, or maybe Bey or Nicks will fall to them at 29. In any case, I don't see any rookie WR making up for the loss of Burress. The Giants have a better chance of Manningham or even Moss being more effective this coming season than any of the rookie WRs. They've got to pick up Edwards or even Holt to partially make up for what Burress gave them.
|
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Giants may see more of Michael Vick | Nov '09 | Turn head an... | 26 |
| Manning, Bradshaw Limited In Practice | Oct '09 | Cheap Champion | 1 |
| Can Manningham Step in and Play a Part for the ... (Apr '09) | Apr '09 | Steve | 1 |
| Giants release Burress 4 months after shooting (Apr '09) | Apr '09 | big tim | 7 |
| Plaxico Burress skips first day of New York Gia... (Mar '09) | Mar '09 | Bo Stitch | 1 |
| With Tynes ready, Giants' Coughlin must pick a ... (Oct '08) | Oct '08 | is it true | 6 |