Out of whack

Out of whack

There are 5 comments on the Baltimore Sun story from May 22, 2008, titled Out of whack. In it, Baltimore Sun reports that:

Tennessee Titans center Kevin Mawae , who is also president of the NFL Players Association, and Miami Dolphins kicker Jay Feely said in a radio interview that Ryan's contract - and the long-standing system of ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Baltimore Sun.

Jimmy D

Washington, DC

#1 May 22, 2008
Bill,

I have reservations about capping the pay of rookies coming into the NFL. First, we are rewarding owners, not veteran players, for letting this get out of hand in the first place. If owners were not willing to pay these prices rookie salaries would not be so high. But they pay them. Owners do this to increase their chances of success in the future. They could just as easily trade down out of the first round for more picks (and more chances at finding quality players) in the later rounds that would cost significantly less and save cap space for proven veterans, but they do not. They do not because in their eyes (and in the eyes of their accountants) these high profile rookies are worth every penny. My guess is that even if Ryan is a bust, the increase in ticket sales during his trial period will more than make up for his lofty price tag.

Second, do we honestly believe that if owners are able to spend less on rookies they will spend more on veterans? My belief is that the money saved is profit earned, not increased veteran salaries. As you said yourself, the high rookie pay checks have led to a higher pay ceiling for later round veterans down the road. I tend to believe that the inverse is true as well- smaller rookie pay checks equals smaller veteran paychecks. I will not completely rule out the possibility of pay shifting to veterans, but I think it is a bit of a leap of faith to believe that owners are willing to dump millions in potential profits into veterans that have shown for years that they are willing to take less.

I see a system run on pretty simple economic principles at work here. The demand for high profile rookies is through the roof. As demand increases for a finite item, so does the price. This year's draft trade between Jacksonville and Baltimore is a perfect example of the willingness of teams to do whatever it takes to pay one guy millions rather than take three or four players for less money. It is worth it to the owners. If the price for the top rookies outpaced their value to the franchise you would see more teams willing to trade down on draft day. But we do not. We do not because owners know these guys, even the busts, are worth it.
Another View

Pompano Beach, FL

#2 May 22, 2008
Bill:
I see the NFL adding a 17th regular season game as a hidden ploy to force each team to play one regular season game in another city or country. This really irks me considering how much each stadium costs the community and the relatively few games that the NFL actually uses them anyway. It is merely another gimmick for the owners to make even more money. What do you think?
Balto County

Baltimore, MD

#3 May 22, 2008
Jimmy D wrote:
Bill,
I have reservations about capping the pay of rookies coming into the NFL. First, we are rewarding owners, not veteran players, for letting this get out of hand in the first place. If owners were not willing to pay these prices rookie salaries would not be so high. But they pay them. Owners do this to increase their chances of success in the future. They could just as easily trade down out of the first round for more picks (and more chances at finding quality players) in the later rounds that would cost significantly less and save cap space for proven veterans, but they do not. They do not because in their eyes (and in the eyes of their accountants) these high profile rookies are worth every penny. My guess is that even if Ryan is a bust, the increase in ticket sales during his trial period will more than make up for his lofty price tag.
Second, do we honestly believe that if owners are able to spend less on rookies they will spend more on veterans? My belief is that the money saved is profit earned, not increased veteran salaries. As you said yourself, the high rookie pay checks have led to a higher pay ceiling for later round veterans down the road. I tend to believe that the inverse is true as well- smaller rookie pay checks equals smaller veteran paychecks. I will not completely rule out the possibility of pay shifting to veterans, but I think it is a bit of a leap of faith to believe that owners are willing to dump millions in potential profits into veterans that have shown for years that they are willing to take less.
I see a system run on pretty simple economic principles at work here. The demand for high profile rookies is through the roof. As demand increases for a finite item, so does the price. This year's draft trade between Jacksonville and Baltimore is a perfect example of the willingness of teams to do whatever it takes to pay one guy millions rather than take three or four players for less money. It is worth it to the owners. If the price for the top rookies outpaced their value to the franchise you would see more teams willing to trade down on draft day. But we do not. We do not because owners know these guys, even the busts, are worth it.
Well reasoned outstanding analysis.
Reality of the free market. God Bless America.
brtsux

Falls Church, VA

#4 May 22, 2008
the veterans must have forgotten that THEY were once paid "large sums of money" before taking one snap in the pros! They were once rookies that were getting paid big $ and they had not proven anything in the pros! Of course the $ for rookies is higher now - the money for rookies is higher EVERY year - it's called INFLATION!
Rick

United States

#5 May 22, 2008
They may not be satisfied with the quality, but the owners still have no problem forcing season ticket holders to pay full price for them. I have been to one preseason game since the Ravens came to town, but have been forced to pay for all of them. It is the biggest ripoff in sports.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kevin Mawae Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Without a new deal, trouble is brewing for NFL (Jan '10) Jan '10 Gary 1
News NFL headed toward a season without a salary cap... (Jan '10) Jan '10 Thomas 1
News NFL players lobby Congress in battles with leag... (Jan '10) Jan '10 B James 1
News NFL players lobby Congress in battles with league (Jan '10) Jan '10 Rob 1
News Union, NFL could discuss rookie wage scale (Jan '10) Jan '10 Eric 1
News Titans Start New Streak, This Time Winning Stre... (Nov '09) Nov '09 My hero 7
News Titans win 2 straight with mix Young undefeated... (Nov '09) Nov '09 Anonymous 4
More from around the web