"I think that OSU laid down against Wisky because they feared a collision course and a huge match up problem with Boise."Are you kidding? Wisky is the Big Ten power? OSU could not stop them running between the tackles on almost every play? Three years ago when Boise had a much smaller, less talented team they played and beat an Oklahoma running attack with Adrian Peterson. The PAC 10 is the only conference that has a good record against the SEC. Ohio State has not beat USC since the 1970's. Even Woody and Bo had a hard time winning outside the Big Ten. Woody was no match for the Bear losing 35-0. I think that OSU laid down against Wisky because they feared a collision course and a huge match up problem with Boise.
OSU knew that Wisky was going to run the ball on almost every play and still couldn't stop them. UNLV stuffed Wisky most of the time.
The Big MAC is a pathetic conference. What if OSU had to play USC every year? If they can't stop a one dimensional team like Wisky, how would they compete against Nevada, a team that can also throw the ball.
The easiest team on Florida and LSU's schedule was OSU. Thank God OSU doesn't play in the SEC, that would suck having to beat South Carolina (we are 0-3) for 6th place in the conference.
You lost any shred of credibility you may have had on that comment. You are on here saying Boise State is a great team and call the Big Ten a pathetic conference? So what does that mean for the WAC? Pee wee football? And the MWC is no better. And I'm not sure if you saw the bowl games last year, but a Penn State team OSU killed last year beat LSU. So while your SEC comments may have been true for a few years, you couldn't be farther from the truth this year and heading into the future. Ok, I'm done. There is no point in reasoning with somebody with nothing but air between the ears.