K.C. & T.O.? Why The Kansas City Chiefs Need Terrell Owens
So once again prolific wideout and human specimen Terrell Owens is available. Yeah I know, team cancer and perennial selfish player.Full Story
#1 Mar 6, 2009
Although the idea of adding T.O. on the roster sounds good just for the offensive production he can bring,the Chiefs have way to many problems to solve without adding a soon to be disgruntled player to the list because he didn't get a pass thrown to him.
#2 Mar 6, 2009
Whose idea was it to add TO?
#3 Mar 7, 2009
The Kansas City Chiefs do not need Terrell Owens. The Chiefs have many potential ways to spread the ball offensively and that needs to be their focus. We do not need a WR that will cry when the ball doesn't go to him as much as he feels it should. Terrell Owens in my opinion negatively effects everything that the Chiefs and the NFL need to be about. I hope he doesn't get a job.
#4 Mar 8, 2009
He's the Bills problem now.
Add your comments below
|Chiefs lose LB Johnson with leg injury||Sep '14||Laughing Bear Fan||1|
|Chiefs' fortunes turn in a hurry in a stunning ...||Sep '14||Laughing Bear Fan||1|
|Police arrest fifth suspect in sexual assault o... (Dec '13)||Dec '13||Billy R||30|
|How Will Kansas City's Defense Do Without Romeo... (Sep '13)||Sep '13||Chiefs but||1|
|4 Best Free Agents for Andy Reid, Kansas City C... (Jan '13)||Jan '13||badnews59||1|
|Arrowheadlines: Kansas City Chiefs News 12/26 (Dec '12)||Dec '12||ty schumacher||1|
|2013 NFL Mock Draft: Best & Worst Case First-Ro... (Dec '12)||Dec '12||BigDan||1|
Find what you want!
Search Derrick Johnson Forum Now
Copyright © 2014 Topix LLC