Redskins Not Interested In Vick

Redskins Not Interested In Vick

There are 2 comments on the WSLS story from Jul 29, 2009, titled Redskins Not Interested In Vick. In it, WSLS reports that:

Add the Washington Redskins to the growing list of NFL teams that say they aren't interested in Michael Vick.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WSLS.

Cecil Jones

AOL

#1 Jul 29, 2009
The Redskins just added two quality defensive players to what could be the best defense in the league and you are going to tell me that they wouldn't consider taking Mike Vick if they have QB questions? With Vick you get mobility and motivation. That could spell the difference between Superbowl and sitting home watching again.
anonymous coward

Rock Hill, SC

#2 Jul 30, 2009
they definantly need to reconsider this option. If they dont sign vick or any other qb they will be stuck with capbell again. And we all know how this turned out last year. Thats all we really need is a qb and well be straight.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chris Samuels Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Redskins should move up in the draft to take a ... (Apr '14) Apr '14 Bruce Wayne 4
News McNabb rewards fans with hope, so he should be ... (Aug '10) Aug '10 quick fix 4
News Redskins Sign Top Draft Pick, Haynesworth Fails... (Jul '10) Jul '10 va_tazdad 5
News Redskins Sign Top Draft Pick, Haynesworth Fails... (Jul '10) Jul '10 NFL _ live 2
News Redskins needs heading into 2010 (Mar '10) Mar '10 will robinson 1
News Several veteran Redskins left with restricted o... (Mar '10) Mar '10 eagle312 1
News Cerrato: Redskins roster is playoff material (Oct '09) Oct '09 amaveral 1
More from around the web