Redskins Not Interested In Vick
#1 Jul 29, 2009
The Redskins just added two quality defensive players to what could be the best defense in the league and you are going to tell me that they wouldn't consider taking Mike Vick if they have QB questions? With Vick you get mobility and motivation. That could spell the difference between Superbowl and sitting home watching again.
#2 Jul 30, 2009
they definantly need to reconsider this option. If they dont sign vick or any other qb they will be stuck with capbell again. And we all know how this turned out last year. Thats all we really need is a qb and well be straight.
Add your comments below
|Redskins should move up in the draft to take a ... (Apr '14)||Apr '14||Bruce Wayne||4|
|McNabb rewards fans with hope, so he should be ... (Aug '10)||Aug '10||quick fix||4|
|Redskins Sign Top Draft Pick, Haynesworth Fails... (Jul '10)||Jul '10||va_tazdad||5|
|Redskins Sign Top Draft Pick, Haynesworth Fails... (Jul '10)||Jul '10||NFL _ live||2|
|Redskins needs heading into 2010 (Mar '10)||Mar '10||will robinson||1|
|Several veteran Redskins left with restricted o... (Mar '10)||Mar '10||eagle312||1|
|Cerrato: Redskins roster is playoff material (Oct '09)||Oct '09||amaveral||1|
Find what you want!
Search Chris Samuels Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC