Judged:
5
2
1
Comments
|
Judged:
5
2
1 |
||||
|
Joined: Apr 14, 2009 Comments: 689 |
Judged:
4
3
1
THATS RIGHT GOODELL, YOU'RE ON THE RIGHT RACK IN ADMITTING THAT THESE SUSPENSIONS ARE COMPLETELY UNJUSTIFIED AND WRONG.
BACK OFF, AND LOOK AT IT AS A LEASON LEARNED.....PUT STARCAPS ON THE LIST, AND MAKE SURE FROM NOW ON WHEN YOU KNOW THAT A BANNED SUBSTANCE IS IN A DRUG, YOU NOTIFY THE PLAYERS.... P R I C K ! GO VIKINGS! |
|||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
Joined: Sep 23, 2008 Comments: 2859 |
Judged:
5
5
4 |
|||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
4
2
2 Why should they be suspended? Have you read the facts of their case? Star Caps is a product sold to the public in retail stores. It contains a single substance banned by the NFL. However, Star Caps' list of ingredients failed to list that one banned substance, so how can you expect the Williams' to know it was in there? Second point - Star Caps is not a 'performance enhancing' drug along the lines of steroids. It is a diuretic. Look it up. Not exactly going to make those players any stronger on the field. The NFL tells their players, "Here is a list of products and substances you are forbidden to use:..." Star Caps were not on that list, and are available for legal retail purchase. Add to that the fact that the illegal substance contained in Star Caps were not mentioned on the product's list of ingredients, and you think they should be suspended? No way. The NFL should simply add the product to their list (as I'm sure they already have), and leave it be. Lesson learned. |
||||
Joined: Jun 8, 2008 Comments: 278 |
Judged:
1
1
1 |
|||
|
Judged:
3
2
1 May I present the name "Brett Favre" to you in July of 2008? The League Rules call for you to act on a players (Bretts') application for reinstatement WITHIN 24 hours of its' filing!!!! How's come you VIOLATED that rule (in the face of the NFLPlayers Union) and delayed your action to approve or disapprove for SIX DAYS?? That deliberate offense on your part was sufficient to accomplish the chain of events that benefited the agenda of the Packers Organization and scuttled Favres' best interests by sending him a week late into the pre-season at New York. THAT delay laid the cornerstone for Favre to rush into the fray with insufficient warm-up time during his very first practice where he tore the bicep in his shoulder in his hurry to get up to speed. THAT is where the injury started. NOT half-way thru the season. What standard of "fairness" defines your actions in that case, Mr. G!? |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Mr. Goodell, don't you think Congress has more pressing matters to tend too? Time to move on!! |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 |
||||
|
Joined: Apr 14, 2009 Comments: 689 |
Judged:
2
1
1
THE BOTTOM LINE STILL IS THAT THE NFL "REFUSES" TO ADMIT THAT "THEY" WERE IN THE WRONG! NO MATTER WHAT. GOODELL IS AN IDIOT AND SO ARE THE PEOPLE BACKING HIM UP!! IT WAS A CLEAR MISTAKE ON THE NFL'S PART BECAUSE THEY DID NOT NOTIFY PLAYERS OF THE ISSUES PERTAINING TO STARCAPS...OR....THEY DIDN'T KNOW EITHER.
ADMIT THAT YOU ARE WRONG!!! IT REALLY ISN'T THAT HARD, "AND" IT SHOWS INTEGRITY!! GO VIKINGS!!!!!!!! |
|||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
Joined: Sep 23, 2008 Comments: 2859 |
Judged:
2 use of starcaps will mask drug use..that is the issue |
|||
Joined: Sep 23, 2008 Comments: 2859 |
Judged:
1
1 |
|||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
|
“Are you serious?” Joined: Mar 25, 2008 Comments: 998 Da Range ISP: Sparta, WI |
Judged:
1
1 |
|||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 If they had disclosed that from the time it became known, either these suspensions would have been served last year, or they never would have been necessary because the Williamses would have avoided taking StarCaps. The league's insistence on imposing these suspensions despite their failure to disclose what they knew about StarCaps makes the league look like bullies. The NFL would rather play a game of 'gotcha' with its players instead of truly looking out for the players' health and the integrity of the game. Goodell can't have it both ways: Either you reveal the knowledge you have about nutritional supplements to protect the players, or you leave it up to the players to take what they want. But you don't hide information from players who are making the effort to abide by the rules, and then turn around and suspend them for not having knowledge that you kept from them. That's bogus, and everyone except Goodell seems to realize this. |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1 Starcaps has the POTENTAL to be and CAN be used as mask for drug or steroid use. No proof what so ever that either were masked in this case. The Williams wall never tested postive for either of them. They have been tested 13 times since with no failures for anything. The REAL issue is was the banned substance properly labeled by the manufacturere with this substance and did the NFL indentify it for the players on their list of banned substances. Obviously the courts think that neither were done properly. Get a clue Oxboro. |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan. 14 a key date for Vikings' Williamses in S... | 17 hr | A New Day | 30 |
| Analyst: Grant and Smith may get to play all ye... | Sep '09 | ALaudun | 1 |
| Predicting the Saints' 53-man opening day roste... | Sep '09 | Mookie | 9 |
| Kevin and Pat Williams' fate in hands of appeal... | Aug '09 | Lemuel Smegma | 1 |
| Judge: Suspensions of Minnesota Vikings' Kevin ... (May '09) | May '09 | purplehaze | 4 |
| Union lawyer: 8 NFL players tested positive for... (May '09) | May '09 | Dr Larry | 39 |
| Is New Orleans Saints rookie cornerback Malcolm... (May '09) | May '09 | Mookie | 1 |