Notebook: Broken arm could end tight end Tory Humphrey's Green Bay Packers tenure

Judged:

Here we go. The inevitable injuries will provide the TT lovers with yet another excuse for why the Packers need to suffer through a losing season again.

Rick

Baltimore, MD

GBPfan wrote:

Here we go. The inevitable injuries will provide the TT lovers with yet another excuse for why the Packers need to suffer through a losing season again.

Please stop the negativity and enjoy the fact that Football is here.

eric

the man suffers yet another injury and slows down a young career and yet the Whiner comes up with yet another anti ted entry.Gee there's a shock.

Yes we get it,he has a losing record so you think he sucks and dont like him,even though he rebuilt the team and had a 4-12 record his first year and made the NFC title game his 3rd season.Whats his record after his first season? 28-23 i beleive.

eric

27-21 from year 2 -4. Sorry getttng ready to go to work and doing 4 things at once.

jeremy

Mooreton, ND

OH NO! We are going 4-12 without Tory on the field!

GBPfan

Rick wrote:

<quoted text>
Please stop the negativity and enjoy the fact that Football is here.

I know that you love to be negative about Packer winners and positive about Packer losers. I am smart enough to be positive about Packer winners and negative about Packer losers. Your jealousy of my superior intelligence is unbecoming, to say the least.

GBPfan

eric wrote:

27-21 from year 2 -4. Sorry getttng ready to go to work and doing 4 things at once.

It is just like you to ignore the facts that don't support your love for Turd Thompson. If you cared about the Packers more, you wouldn't ignore the damage he has done to the Packers. The facts: 31-33 and one playoff appearance under TT's mismanagement. DO NOT ignore the FACTS.

eric

fact is Ted went 8-8,13-3 then a drop off to 6-10 thats 27-21 in 3 years after a 4-12 first year after he cleaned house and started to rebuild when we had cap problems.Everyone and their Grandmother knew his first year,we would suck,he had to get rid of players to become cap friendly and we had a record 30+ rookies and 2nd year players abd that was SHermans fault for the cap not Ted;s,the next 3 years 27-21 which is a winning record and a title game appearence.So instead of letting the facts get on the way,you can call him Turd just like the Viking fans all you want..Speaking of that,it was Ted sucks until a VIKING FAN called him TURD,Now you call him TURD,whats up with that GBPfan,i thought you were a Packer fan not a Viking fan? Oh a fraud just like I called it hah?
Now answer my legit question,,you proposed a question and when Rick and Myself answered it,it wasnt somthing you wanted to hear,so you started with the rude classless name calling,now i propose a question to you! now lets hear your answer WHo would you replace Ted with as GM?

GBPfan

I guess Atlanta and Miami haven't heard of the rule (made up by eric) that you must suck for years in order to get better. Lucky for them. In the mean time, the real Packer fans have to endure the losing, the failure, and the stupidity.

GBPfan

As for your question. Pay attention. I already told you I see no purpose in putting names out there. I will ALWAYS support the Packers. I will support the new GM unless and until they prove to be a loser.

I don't think it serves the Packers to discuss who should be GM until the decesion to change GMs becomes official. Who may be available and who may be interested changes by the day, the week, the month, and the year. I don't intend to start speculating about who should be chosen at some unknown time in the future. Needless to say, as you have correctly pointed out, there exists a wide pool of people to choose from, anyone of whom deserves to be considered as Turd Thompson's replacement.

I do agree with you that there are people that would be great GMs. Hopefully, the Packers will have one someday. The sooner, the better.

eric

GBPfan wrote:

I guess Atlanta and Miami haven't heard of the rule (made up by eric) that you must suck for years in order to get better. Lucky for them. In the mean time, the real Packer fans have to endure the losing, the failure, and the stupidity.

Just curious,if the Packers go 10-6,make the playoffs ect,what in hell are you going to say or do?

Rick

GBPfan wrote:

<quoted text>
I know that you love to be negative about Packer winners and positive about Packer losers. I am smart enough to be positive about Packer winners and negative about Packer losers. Your jealousy of my superior intelligence is unbecoming, to say the least.

Will you please shut up and enjoy the posts!!!!! Packers football!!!!! Good God, Lady, you are a freak!

Stop it!!!!!

GBPfan

eric wrote:

<quoted text>Just curious,if the Packers go 10-6,make the playoffs ect,what in hell are you going to say or do?

With TT in charge, the odds are extremely low. I haven't spent any time wondering about that. I haven't spent any time wondering about what I'de say if pigs fly either.

GBPfan

Rick wrote:

<quoted text>
Will you please shut up and enjoy the posts!!!!! Packers football!!!!! Good God, Lady, you are a freak!
Stop it!!!!!

Please! I'm the only one that adds any humor or excitement whatsoever to the otherwise dull as hell circle jerk that most of you engage in. You're all like: If we all agree to ignore the facts and hold hands together and wish really, really hard all our dreams will come true. It's enough to send me into a diabetic coma. And I don't even have Diabetes!

Rick

GBPfan wrote:

<quoted text>
Please! I'm the only one that adds any humor or excitement whatsoever to the otherwise dull as hell circle jerk that most of you engage in. You're all like: If we all agree to ignore the facts and hold hands together and wish really, really hard all our dreams will come true. It's enough to send me into a diabetic coma. And I don't even have Diabetes!

Yeah, hold hands and hope the Packers win.

I see nothing wrong with that.

Stop the negativity.......

GBPfan

Living in the real world, acknowledging the facts, does not make me negative. It means I'm not some delusional fool. I can accept facts and wish for the best at the same time. I really don't want to listen to you whine about your inability to do so.

Rick

GBPfan wrote:

Living in the real world, acknowledging the facts, does not make me negative. It means I'm not some delusional fool. I can accept facts and wish for the best at the same time. I really don't want to listen to you whine about your inability to do so.

Answer this then. Why does no one LIKE you here? Huh? No one likes you here. Get it? You either play nice or move on, lady. I am sick and tired of your antics. No one likes you here..... No one enjoys posting to you.

GBPfan

See? I help to add humor to the posts, including yours. Your portrayal of a whiny child made me LMAO. Thanks.

Dewy

Schofield, WI

GBPfan wrote:

<quoted text>
With TT in charge, the odds are extremely low. I haven't spent any time wondering about that. I haven't spent any time wondering about what I'de say if pigs fly either.

You are now starting to sound like so many of the republicans that are hoping the Pres. fails and doing this without thinking about the country but only about there party. With you its a fit so, Packers lose good they will fire TT. So the real meaning to your thoughts are Packers can lose just so TT gets fired. Iam now done answering your post you have to be the poorest fan a team could have. GET A LIFE.

Rick