Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares for Supreme Court decision

Full story: Fox News

Big change is coming to the lives of the lesbian couple at the center of the fight for same-sex marriage in California no matter how the Supreme Court decides their case.

Comments (Page 4)

Showing posts 61 - 80 of1,556
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Mar 26, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
so the bigotry name calling was just for fun? nothing to back it up? like the rest of your rants?
good to know...
If you understood how old both me and Kimare were, would you still talk, boy?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Mar 26, 2013
 
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
No, men cannot nurture better than women, you don't know women one bit, whippersnapper.
some can. i know women without a nurturing bone in their body...

you soundl like one of them...

“Extra Extra read all about it”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Mar 26, 2013
 
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying that all men are incapable of nurturing their own children? You are really saying that all women are incapable of instilling confidence and courage in a child? And you can say these things, even though you have never met a single child raised by gay parents?
You have to see that this just isn't logical.
All of that aside, you seem to missing the most important part of this discussion on marriage.
It's not about who you think are the best parents for kids. This is not about your idea of the perfect family. There are 1.5 million children ALREADY being raised by gay parents. There is NO provision in any marriage law that prevents that, or WILL prevent that in the future.
The only question is whether or not those 1.5 million kids will be even more secure with married parents, than without them. Can you provide any reasoning for the idea that some kids are more secure and protected if their parents can NEVER legally marry?
It's not the fact a gay couple can or can not do what straight couples can, it's the fact that a baby needs both man and woman. It's just natural law of things. Not to say if a gay couple raise a child it would grow up dysfunctional or anything, but it's not natural, or the nature of things. I say love who you want, just stop shoving it in people's faces, and leave children out of it. Yet, we are a politically correct society, and people are extra sensitive these days, and we can't hurt anyone's feelings, so inevitably one day you'll be able to marry the same sex and kids are already being raised by gay people. Whatever, if a gay couple can marry, then I want to hot bisexual women to marry me and have kids with both of them.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

allusernameshavebeenused wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not the fact a gay couple can or can not do what straight couples can, it's the fact that a baby needs both man and woman. It's just natural law of things. Not to say if a gay couple raise a child it would grow up dysfunctional or anything, but it's not natural, or the nature of things. I say love who you want, just stop shoving it in people's faces, and leave children out of it. Yet, we are a politically correct society, and people are extra sensitive these days, and we can't hurt anyone's feelings, so inevitably one day you'll be able to marry the same sex and kids are already being raised by gay people. Whatever, if a gay couple can marry, then I want to hot bisexual women to marry me and have kids with both of them.
you are wrong not all user names have been taken. you should have used illinformedstupidbigot.

try it nest time...
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Mar 26, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>some can. i know women without a nurturing bone in their body...
you soundl like one of them...
I am a man you fool! And women who are unable to nurture are damaged worthless goods!
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Mar 26, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>you are wrong not all user names have been taken. you should have used illinformedstupidbigot.
try it nest time...
Spell the word next properly, mentally incompetent little turd!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a man you fool! And women who are unable to nurture are damaged worthless goods!
sure you are...sure you are...

you talk like a little woman...

you are obviously damaged goods, slightly insane, angry as hell and a total bigot...

obvious why no human ever saw you fit to have children with, or even sex, i would imagine...
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>sure you are...sure you are...
you talk like a little woman...
you are obviously damaged goods, slightly insane, angry as hell and a total bigot...
obvious why no human ever saw you fit to have children with, or even sex, i would imagine...
Silence! Listen here!

Ratchet is very cute, he ought to be supported!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Silence! Listen here!
Ratchet is very cute, he ought to be supported!
You always run back to your dolls when you are corned by your own stupidity...why is that little girl?

oh wait...are they inflateable dolls? now i get it...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Mar 26, 2013
 
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
happy to point out your militant anger whenever I can!
see it up there?
you are more like those you claim to hate than you think...
My anger is righteous and therein lies the difference. Theirs comes from their arrogance and their fear. Their version of the "natural order" is under assault by those they deem unworthy of tolerance, let alone acceptance. Mine comes from having grown up in their "natural order" and being deemed unworthy of tolerance, let alone acceptance. Not by my choice, but theirs. I grew up being taught that I lived in a country which more or less believed that we were all equal, but treated us as pariah unworthy of even that. We're sorry if they are frightened of what has to be, but their problems with us, not our problem any more.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Mar 26, 2013
 
LargeLanguage wrote:
I am a man you fool!
You really should be taking notes cupcake. If you had, you could have known not to make the same mistake. Take this down this time for future reference. Despite any physical resemblance you might have in being an adult male of the human species to being a man, that should not be confused by you into thinking you are one. You aren't, in 58 years, you got nowhere close.
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>My anger is righteous and therein lies the difference. Theirs comes from their arrogance and their fear. Their version of the "natural order" is under assault by those they deem unworthy of tolerance, let alone acceptance. Mine comes from having grown up in their "natural order" and being deemed unworthy of tolerance, let alone acceptance. Not by my choice, but theirs. I grew up being taught that I lived in a country which more or less believed that we were all equal, but treated us as pariah unworthy of even that. We're sorry if they are frightened of what has to be, but their problems with us, not our problem any more.
Just because you have a right to be angry, doesn't mean you should mistreat people and put them on a level below how you should treat a person.
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>You always run back to your dolls when you are corned by your own stupidity...why is that little girl?
oh wait...are they inflateable dolls? now i get it...
It is not a fetish, you are worthless.
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>You really should be taking notes cupcake. If you had, you could have known not to make the same mistake. Take this down this time for future reference. Despite any physical resemblance you might have in being an adult male of the human species to being a man, that should not be confused by you into thinking you are one. You aren't, in 58 years, you got nowhere close.
Obviously what I said must have angered you.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Mar 26, 2013
 
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not a fetish, you are worthless.
go back to your dolls, you add nothing to this world. nothing.

“Extra Extra read all about it”

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Mar 26, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>you are wrong not all user names have been taken. you should have used illinformedstupidbigot.
try it nest time...
lol, ok, Rosie O'Donnell, whatever you say.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

allusernameshavebeenused wrote:
<quoted text>
lol, ok, Rosie O'Donnell, whatever you say.
perhspa you could use twocousinshadsexandthisisthere sult...

we give extra letters for the hadicapped...we're nice that way...
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>go back to your dolls, you add nothing to this world. nothing.
Getting angry, boy?
LargeLanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>perhspa you could use twocousinshadsexandthisisthere sult...
we give extra letters for the hadicapped...we're nice that way...
Lol, grow up youngster.

Not that I mind childish jokes, but obviously, if you are so juvenile, perhaps that is the reason you get your butt kicked.
No you are

Stamford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't love someone of the same sex. Now look here, if your husband has dead, you should get another husband. And don't go lucking to more for support and confidence on a public forum, because you have no man. Scoot off, runt!
But it's going to take a while. First I'll have to mourn and then date. It's not like I just go to the store and pick out a good man. It could take years and years So back to my question......what do I do with the kids? I mean I don't want to damage them by trying to raise them myself. As you said, kids need a mother and a father. Should I put them into foster care? At least there they will have both a mother and father figure, sure they might get smacked around but as long as they have both a mother and father figure-it's all good, right?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 61 - 80 of1,556
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••