You've not only proved nothing, you've not made it to first base.<quoted text>
KiMare, the basis of this argument has already been illustrated to be disingenuous. There is no prerequisite for, nor a requirement of procreation relative to legal marriage.
Which I have already pointed out. Do you mean to contribute to the arguments against your logic?
This is utterly irrelevant, and also untrue. If neither partner carries any disease, then the need to protection does not necessarily exist. Grow up.
It is a major distinction between your warped world view and reality.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Children are an integral part and purpose of that.
I understand this is confusing to homosexuals, since their mating behavior is defective.
Furthermore, as a gay, you are fully aware that anal sex REQUIRES a condom and lub, irregardless of disease. It is irresponsible of you to deny that.
Nor is it irrelevant. It exposes at the most intimate physical level the distinction between marriage and ss couples. A fundamental physical failure.