The Sexual Fetish of Gay Marriage Opponents

Mar 22, 2013 Full story: www.slate.com 263

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor, opponents of same-sex marriage have scrambled to answer the central question: What is the government’s rational interest in preventing gays from marrying? The standard argument from moral disapproval was revoked by Romer v. Evans and Lawrence v. Texas. The argument that gay marriages undermine the family has been debunked by a decade of same-sex marriage in several countries. So, as Proposition 8 and DOMA wound their way through the courts, gay marriage opponents lit upon a more durable argument, seemingly grounded in science rather than animus or religion. Their case, presented most comprehensively by Princeton professor Robert P. George, is that only sex acts with a “dynamism toward reproduction” — that is, penile to vaginal intercourse — create true marriages and lead to legitimate child-rearing. Same-sex marriages, by this theory, are not “real” marriages, because they do not involve “organic bodily union.”

Editor's note: so I guess all infertile heterosexuals are also denied legal marriage then?

Full Story

“Common courtesy, isn't”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#22 Mar 22, 2013
Playing out this argument to its illogical end, if child-bearing (and not even child-rearing) is the only point of marriage, then why not require a birth certificate in lieu of a marriage license, should a couple wish to marry?

This would protect the state's supposed interest in "defending" so-called "traditional marriage". Of course, then there arises the question of state-mandated divorce in the event the woman should have a hysterectomy or go through menopause.

And talk about your slippery slopes! Someone, somewhere, is going to demand a polygamous marriage should one of the partners have a child with a third party.

The whole idea is utterly ridiculous and defies common sense.
Polly

Alexandria, VA

#23 Mar 22, 2013
Gay And Proud wrote:
<quoted text>You really need to work on your pickup lines. Try starting with a compliment. You'll get more dates.
Hey big boy, will you suc:k my d!ck for a pizza?

Since: Apr 08

Chagrin Falls, OH

#24 Mar 22, 2013
Otter in the Ozarks wrote:
Playing out this argument to its illogical end, if child-bearing (and not even child-rearing) is the only point of marriage, then why not require a birth certificate in lieu of a marriage license, should a couple wish to marry?
This would protect the state's supposed interest in "defending" so-called "traditional marriage". Of course, then there arises the question of state-mandated divorce in the event the woman should have a hysterectomy or go through menopause.
And talk about your slippery slopes! Someone, somewhere, is going to demand a polygamous marriage should one of the partners have a child with a third party.
The whole idea is utterly ridiculous and defies common sense.
If they require a birth certificate naming the two parents to be legally married as the parents of the child, we'd already have to include same-sex couples as legally married. Those of us (like my same-sex partner and I just as one example) who adopt often do get birth certificates for our children naming both of us as legal parents.(That's how it worked when we adopted in Minnesota.)

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#25 Mar 22, 2013
Fred wrote:
Don't matter what you consider them, they're queers none the less.
Actually they aren't. They typically have wives or girlfriends and do not have sex with adult men.

And adult "out" gay men are not attracted to children, just like adult straight men are not attracted to children. Pedophiles are attracted to children.
Polly

Alexandria, VA

#26 Mar 22, 2013
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>Actually they aren't. They typically have wives or girlfriends and do not have sex with adult men.

And adult "out" gay men are not attracted to children, just like adult straight men are not attracted to children. Pedophiles are attracted to children.
Is that how you started out? Or was you a closet queer like most are. Sounds like you know from experience, otherwise you couldn't possible know whether or not they have sex with men. That's why they are called, closet queers, they hide that fact.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#27 Mar 22, 2013
Polly wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that how you started out? Or was you a closet queer like most are. Sounds like you know from experience, otherwise you couldn't possible know whether or not they have sex with men. That's why they are called, closet queers, they hide that fact.
If you're on a computer, you should know how to google. Do your research because you're making a fool of yourself. The research is clear. Read it.

Since: Apr 08

Chagrin Falls, OH

#28 Mar 22, 2013
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're on a computer, you should know how to google. Do your research because you're making a fool of yourself. The research is clear. Read it.
Bigots never let inconvenient things like facts get in the way of their firmly held beliefs!

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#29 Mar 22, 2013
Fred wrote:
<quoted text>
Why you so mean? You not get your sexual appetite satisfied today?
....You should have read my link I gave you...oh well, I tried and failed. see ya

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#31 Mar 22, 2013
Felix wrote:
<quoted text>
At life, you sure did!
Cheap shot f(_)cker, you should have read it. So you think your superior for being a c(_)ntlicker?..think again, you're just typical trash without an opinion other than what mommy told you..Boring

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32 Mar 22, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, you'd be wrong and the evidence clearly shows that......like I stated earlier.....READ THE FRUCKING article that a link was provide to......they would know more about the issue than you would!!!
Thank you..

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

#33 Mar 22, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you..
You're welcome:-)
Fred

Alexandria, VA

#36 Mar 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>No. Those people are called pedophiles. Queers like MEN, not children.
Pedophiles are MEN, not children. Queer Pedophiles like boy children. Get over it freak.
Fred

Alexandria, VA

#37 Mar 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>No. Those people are called pedophiles. Queers like MEN, not children.
Sounds to me like you might be a queer pedophile and trying to cover it up.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#38 Mar 23, 2013
I miss Frank Stanton. :(

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#41 Mar 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Since YOU are the one who continuously brings up sex with children, all eyes focus on YOU.
I already sent him a link to drake university with FACTUAL proof that sexual predators mostly identify as heterosexual. He's just an ignorant bigoted moron!
Hans

Romania

#43 Mar 23, 2013
I love how homosexuals "identify as heterosexual" as they're buttf*cking boys. How does that work?
Some Never Came Home

Toronto, Canada

#45 Mar 23, 2013
Hans wrote:
I love how homosexuals "identify as heterosexual" as they're buttf*cking boys. How does that work?
So why don't you clue us in? I mean you're the one it seems with all the experience now aren't you! You one trick pony Moron! LOL
Mr Henderson

Mount Pleasant, TX

#46 Mar 23, 2013
Speaking of sexual fetishes...

Peer reviewed clinical studies have concluded the average male queer consumes 22.43 lbs of fecal matter on an annual basis.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#48 Mar 23, 2013
Mr Henderson wrote:
Speaking of sexual fetishes...
Peer reviewed clinical studies have concluded the average male queer consumes 22.43 lbs of fecal matter on an annual basis.
Is that why your eyes are brown?

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#49 Mar 23, 2013
Hans wrote:
I love how homosexuals "identify as heterosexual" as they're buttf*cking boys. How does that work?
I don't know, since I'm open about my sexuality..Maybe you're better at answering that question?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Parenting Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Spanking Is Great for Sex 17 hr Suculent-dry 2
Harvard and Stanford Experts Speak Out Against ... Thu HumanSpirit 8
Judge Byrd reprimanded in Wilson County case (Feb '08) Sep 14 Gold finger 143
Who should do the Spanking ? Mom or Dad ? (Aug '12) Sep 11 amy19013 38
The Duggars are 'trying' for a 20th baby (Oct '13) Sep 4 fedupwiththemess 5
The boy they couldn't save Sep 1 If you see it rep... 2
Colorado Lesbian Wendy Alfredsen Mom Granted Pa... (May '12) Aug 27 DNF 21
•••

Parenting People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••