Debbie Rowe Is Furious With The Jackson Family

Apr 14, 2014 Full story: Malaysian National News Agency 103

Debbie Rowe is furious with Michael Jackson's brothers for accusing her of abandoning her children for money.

Full Story
Rigo

Bronx, NY

#24 Apr 16, 2014
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
She has regrets?
Quite frankly, she should just be happy that Paris is willing to spend time with her. She signed those kids over to Wacko and the clown avoided her at all costs. Still, she is willing to buy the bullet to shoot Dr Murray. She did abandon those kids for money. That is why Prince will have nothing to do with her. It is her fault.
They made a deal. It was a financial transaction. No different than hiring a surrogate mother. Plain and simple.

She was eager to be in MJ's orbit and would do anything for him. He could also be quite manipulative i'm sure. The money offered to Ms Rowe sure helped.

The whole marriage thing was a sham.

In hindsight. It was very foolish. He should not have brought children into the world. He couldn't be there over the long haul. Look at what happened.

Prince Jackson view is valid. But, it was a business deal.

Nobody inclduing Rowe relly thought abou the lng term.

It was also selfish of Micheal to totally cut her out of the children's life. But, i believe that were his intention all along.

He saw them as HIS children. Nobody else. Not even the natural mother Debbie Rowe. Who ironically is more closely related to the two oldest by blood than Micheal was just by virtue of the fact that she is the biological mother.
Rigo

Bronx, NY

#25 Apr 16, 2014
Nobody including Rowe really bothered to think about the long term.
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#26 Apr 16, 2014
Rigo wrote:
<quoted text> They made a deal. It was a financial transaction. No different than hiring a surrogate mother. Plain and simple.
She was eager to be in MJ's orbit and would do anything for him. He could also be quite manipulative i'm sure. The money offered to Ms Rowe sure helped.
The whole marriage thing was a sham.
In hindsight. It was very foolish. He should not have brought children into the world. He couldn't be there over the long haul. Look at what happened.
Prince Jackson view is valid. But, it was a business deal.
Nobody inclduing Rowe relly thought abou the lng term.
It was also selfish of Micheal to totally cut her out of the children's life. But, i believe that were his intention all along.
He saw them as HIS children. Nobody else. Not even the natural mother Debbie Rowe. Who ironically is more closely related to the two oldest by blood than Micheal was just by virtue of the fact that she is the biological mother.
Jacko wanted to be a divorced father with kids to create an illusion of being a family man while still sleeping with young boys. It apparently worked with some of his fans that believe that he was a great father therefore, could never be a child molester. I think Jacko knew that those kids would love him and they would be his only hope to redeem himself. However, he failed because he is still known as a serial pedophile. Wacko tried every trick in the book to spin it around every which way. The clown was like a Mommy Dearest. He hid them behind masks and veils.

“Still the Dark Lord.”

Since: Jun 13

Everywhere.

#27 Apr 16, 2014
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
Then Prince Michael I should emancipate. He's got plenty money and I don't see why Paris and Blanket would not go with him, if he comes their guardian.
I think that would likely be the best thing for them.

“This is what a person who ”

Since: Mar 14

hates paedos looks like

#28 Apr 16, 2014
Reality_Awaits wrote:
<quoted text>
Was it their environment, you think? Surely not!
urur
Hell, yes! The apple never falls far from the tree even when that tree is bought at a garden centre and planted in somebody else's garden.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

#29 Apr 16, 2014
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
Jacko wanted to be a divorced father with kids to create an illusion of being a family man while still sleeping with young boys. It apparently worked with some of his fans that believe that he was a great father therefore, could never be a child molester. I think Jacko knew that those kids would love him and they would be his only hope to redeem himself. However, he failed because he is still known as a serial pedophile. Wacko tried every trick in the book to spin it around every which way. The clown was like a Mommy Dearest. He hid them behind masks and veils.
His kids were not shielded behind masks and veils as they got older; Prince and Paris particularly did not want to wear masks and not long before MJ died, the kids were seen without any masks and veils. There is still considerable debate as to whether it's bad or good for celebrity children to be photographed..

There is no evidence that MJ was a serial pedophile. The accusers were always made by kids who had shady parents who wanted money. That is an indisputable fact; whereas your claim that MJ was a pedophile is not.
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#30 Apr 16, 2014
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> His kids were not shielded behind masks and veils as they got older; Prince and Paris particularly did not want to wear masks and not long before MJ died, the kids were seen without any masks and veils. There is still considerable debate as to whether it's bad or good for celebrity children to be photographed..
There is no evidence that MJ was a serial pedophile. The accusers were always made by kids who had shady parents who wanted money. That is an indisputable fact; whereas your claim that MJ was a pedophile is not.
Excuses, excuses.

We all know that Michael Jackson was a pedophile. Merely saying that he wasn't, is not cutting it anymore because there is plenty of evidence. Too bad.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#31 Apr 16, 2014
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
Then Prince Michael I should emancipate. He's got plenty money and I don't see why Paris and Blanket would not go with him, if he comes their guardian.
Agreed. For the sake of his own happiness and his siblings happiness, he should emancipate himself. Otherwise, he'll be financially supporting the rest of the Jacksons.

“This is what a person who ”

Since: Mar 14

hates paedos looks like

#32 Apr 17, 2014
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> His kids were not shielded behind masks and veils as they got older; Prince and Paris particularly did not want to wear masks and not long before MJ died, the kids were seen without any masks and veils. There is still considerable debate as to whether it's bad or good for celebrity children to be photographed..
There is no evidence that MJ was a serial pedophile. The accusers were always made by kids who had shai'd like to read some oddy parents who wanted money. That is an indisputable fact; whereas your claim that MJ was a pedophile is not.
Wade Robson's mother wants money?
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#33 Apr 17, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Wade Robson's mother wants money?
Good point.

Wade's mother is not seeking money from the estate nor has she ever. It kind of puts the theory that Wacko was always a victim of lies from parents that made their children lie about being molested by the clown to get his money as irrelevant. Wacko was a disgusting animal.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#34 Apr 17, 2014
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point.
Wade's mother is not seeking money from the estate nor has she ever. It kind of puts the theory that Wacko was always a victim of lies from parents that made their children lie about being molested by the clown to get his money as irrelevant. Wacko was a disgusting animal.
Wade's mother got what she wanted from Michael, long ago, by pimping her son. I'm surprised he hasn't turned around and sued her for negligence, etc. Any mother who drives her son to spend the night with Pedo Pan, around one o'clock in the morning, isn't trustworthy with children.

Wade just wants his day in court and to have his therapy expenses covered by the estate.
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#35 Apr 17, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Wade's mother got what she wanted from Michael, long ago, by pimping her son. I'm surprised he hasn't turned around and sued her for negligence, etc. Any mother who drives her son to spend the night with Pedo Pan, around one o'clock in the morning, isn't trustworthy with children.
Wade just wants his day in court and to have his therapy expenses covered by the estate.
Basically Wade's so called mother pimped her son to the filthy clown in hopes that he'd break Wade into show business. Nevertheless, floons are not attacking her for seeking money like they claim that Evan Chandler was doing. Either Wade's mother was stupid or she knew that her son was Wacko's play thing and looked the other way. I really wouldn't know what Wade's current relationship is with his mother is today. That remains a mystery.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#36 Apr 17, 2014
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
Basically Wade's so called mother pimped her son to the filthy clown in hopes that he'd break Wade into show business. Nevertheless, floons are not attacking her for seeking money like they claim that Evan Chandler was doing. Either Wade's mother was stupid or she knew that her son was Wacko's play thing and looked the other way. I really wouldn't know what Wade's current relationship is with his mother is today. That remains a mystery.
She wanted her son to break into show business, and she wanted visas to move to the USA. If I were Wade, I wouldn't speak to her. But only he can answer whether or not he does and his reasons. I fail to see how she couldn't know what was happening and turned the other way. On the stand, she admitted when she delivered her son to Michael at his condo, as if he were take-out food, she knew there was only one bed in it and that her son would be sleeping in it, with Michael
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#37 Apr 17, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
She wanted her son to break into show business, and she wanted visas to move to the USA. If I were Wade, I wouldn't speak to her. But only he can answer whether or not he does and his reasons. I fail to see how she couldn't know what was happening and turned the other way. On the stand, she admitted when she delivered her son to Michael at his condo, as if he were take-out food, she knew there was only one bed in it and that her son would be sleeping in it, with Michael
She knew of Wacko's alarms and locks on his bedroom door also. But she still allowed Michael to take Wade. Since some floons would have gladly given their children to Michael to sleep in bed with, I guess Wade's mother was a floon. The clown obviously seeked out other mentally ill people to manipulate them with his celebrity. I do not know if she thought Michael was like an innocent child or if she knew that Wacko was actually molesting Wade but she was certainly an unfit parent. Poor Wade was pimped out to Wacko by his own mother and brainwashed by them both. Sick.

“This is what a person who ”

Since: Mar 14

hates paedos looks like

#38 Apr 18, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
She wanted her son to break into show business, and she wanted visas to move to the USA. If I were Wade, I wouldn't speak to her. But only he can answer whether or not he does and his reasons. I fail to see how she couldn't know what was happening and turned the other way. On the stand, she admitted when she delivered her son to Michael at his condo, as if he were take-out food, she knew there was only one bed in it and that her son would be sleeping in it, with Michael
Uh-oh! Perspeh'loon will blame 7 year old Wade for that.:-(

By the way, it seems strange to me that none of Michael's other 'special' friends is stepping up to the plate to say that Michael didn't touch them when they had their one on one sleepovers. Where are they all? Funny that not one person who was bunged dollars for their 'company' has spoken up to declare how innocent it all was, don't you think?
Surely this is a good time to defend their much maligned benefactor - I wonder why they aren't doing that?

“Waiting for f'loons to wake up”

Since: Dec 06

Goofybaboon's Not Listening

#39 Apr 18, 2014
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
She knew of Wacko's alarms and locks on his bedroom door also. But she still allowed Michael to take Wade. Since some floons would have gladly given their children to Michael to sleep in bed with, I guess Wade's mother was a floon. The clown obviously seeked out other mentally ill people to manipulate them with his celebrity. I do not know if she thought Michael was like an innocent child or if she knew that Wacko was actually molesting Wade but she was certainly an unfit parent. Poor Wade was pimped out to Wacko by his own mother and brainwashed by them both. Sick.
Wacko choose his victims well.

“Waiting for f'loons to wake up”

Since: Dec 06

Goofybaboon's Not Listening

#40 Apr 18, 2014
*chose

“Waiting for f'loons to wake up”

Since: Dec 06

Goofybaboon's Not Listening

#41 Apr 18, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh-oh! Perspeh'loon will blame 7 year old Wade for that.:-(
By the way, it seems strange to me that none of Michael's other 'special' friends is stepping up to the plate to say that Michael didn't touch them when they had their one on one sleepovers. Where are they all? Funny that not one person who was bunged dollars for their 'company' has spoken up to declare how innocent it all was, don't you think?
Surely this is a good time to defend their much maligned benefactor - I wonder why they aren't doing that?
Yeah, and it is only like a month and a half til the court date. Awfully quiet.
Octopus

Schenectady, NY

#42 Apr 18, 2014
Reality_Awaits wrote:
<quoted text>
Wacko choose his victims well.
Except the clown made an error with Jordan Chandler when he believed that his father was not a close influence on him.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#43 Apr 18, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh-oh! Perspeh'loon will blame 7 year old Wade for that.:-(
By the way, it seems strange to me that none of Michael's other 'special' friends is stepping up to the plate to say that Michael didn't touch them when they had their one on one sleepovers. Where are they all? Funny that not one person who was bunged dollars for their 'company' has spoken up to declare how innocent it all was, don't you think?
Surely this is a good time to defend their much maligned benefactor - I wonder why they aren't doing that?
Jina, that's a good point. Michael's other special friends have fallen silent.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Parenting Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
How to Witness to a Jehovah's Witness Ray Comfo... 12 hr Matt9969 74
Naperville Psychotherapist Discovers the Root C... Nov 26 HumanSpirit 1
Why I'm still a Catholic (Oct '13) Nov 25 Catholic Girl 136
Thanksgiving Blessings Found in Parenting an 'I... Nov 24 VACCINES MAIM KILL 3
7,000 kids in CAS care waiting to be adopted Nov 21 across the province 1
Self-reliance: Children are taught to fend for ... Nov 21 observation 1
Why I'm thankful for blogging Nov 20 The Butthurt Blogger 2

Parenting People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE