Turban ban not about safety
#1 Jun 16, 2013
Funny how the Sikhs are not fighting for their children to wear knives, only turbans.
What happened to the religious necessity to wear the Sikh dagger that they are always crying about?
Sikhs are the biggests hypocrites and problem makers in Canada.
We should take a point from France and Belgium and outright ban all religious head coverings in public.
They can dress however they like at home or in their temples.
Problem would be solved.
#2 Jun 16, 2013
I agree 100%m sikh kids are FORCED to wear those disgusting turbans and FORCED not to cut their yucky hair!
Central District, Hong Kong
#3 Jun 16, 2013
sikhs should cut their hair and live like a clean life
#4 Jun 17, 2013
the harami hindu is videographing the entire Chudai scenes
he is ready with LOTA for collecting chranmrit whyen i ejaculate
in the meantinme HARAMI HINDU FROM BEXLEY
READ THIS HARAMI HINDUS KUTTA FROM BEXLEY
harami hindus can never be trusted !
)I have never seen or witnessed any hindu politician or intellectual praising Chatarpathi Shivaji as a hero.
2)Instead some hindu historians branded him as a Coward and Cheater ( who killed Afzal Khan ) by cheating !!
3)Some says Shivaji was a joke of that time as Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb calls him '' Moshe Kohi ''( mountain rat ).
The statue of Shivaji stands in Mumbai. This is ironic–because Bombay was built by the British after the Port of Surat had silted over. Surats merchants disliked having to bribe and pacify the warrior Shivaji, who looted Surat seven times beginning in 1664. These merchants were moved to Bombay by the British.
It is pedagogical to note that both armies had Hindus and Muslims.
Afzal Khan’s army had many Hindus, and the several able generals of Shivaji were Muslims (Siddi Halal, Siddi Wahwah,Nur Khan Baig, Qazi Haider, Shama Khan etc). This was not a battle between Hindus and Muslims, it is was battle for the integrity of the state–the same battle that raged between Delhi and the South (during the reign of Aurenzeb)–the same battle that rages between Delhi and the Naxals and Tamils today.
By eulogizing the local insurgent as a hero, the Hindu Mahasabah is in fact encouraging the Naxals to claim that Delhi’s rule is illegal and that it is OK to rebel against the central authority. If Shivijai’s struggle was against invaders, so the Dalit struggle against the Aryan armies of Arjun was also legitimate.
In a secular society the country the rights of the secularists, the minorities and Muslims are being trampled. Building a statue for a controversial figure who now represents opposition to all Muslims will surely exacerbate Hindu-Muslim relations not only in Bharat but on her bloody borders.
Let us look into the seeds of time and see what makes Shivaji such a controversial figure.
New versions of revisionist history are being propagated , but credible historians agree on these facts which are not in dispute.
Facing a huge Army Shivaji sent a letter saying he was not eager to face Afzal Khan in battle, and he wanted a negotiated settlement.
Facing imminent defeat by the overwhelming force Shivaji decided to meet Afzal Khan under the guise of diplomatic negotiations.
Afzal Khan, after leaving Bijapur wanted agreed to meet Shivaji in an open ground without arms and under normal diplomatic norms of peace and honesty.
Face to face diplomacy was considered a matter of integrity for the Mughals.
A meeting was arranged between Afzal Khan and Shivaji at the foothills of Fort Pratapgad.
A wanted criminal, Shivaji was was not greeted with a rainfall of arrows and was not attacked by 25 Adil Shah’s soldiers. He was accorded safe passage.
Afzal Khan had a large physical stature leading a battle hardened veteran army. He considered this assignment as a small matter of stamping out a pesky regional chieftain who was physically weak and in to position to fight the mighty Adil Shahi Army.
Shivaji prepared carefully and diligently for this encounter; he secretly armed himself with sharp metal razor weapon called wagh nakh (tiger claw), and chilkhat (armour) prior to the meeting.
Afzal Khan embraced him before the commencement of supposed negotiations
During the embrace Shivaji surreptitiously attacked AfzalKhan with the “wagh nakh” and “bich’hwa“, spilling his blood and entrails on the ground.
and it change the station name victoria to cst.....
so all embrace Islam Raj hindu from Bexley and Chicago
Central District, Hong Kong
#6 Jun 17, 2013
harame we are talking about sikh turban and you have something else pen chud come to some point - sikhraaaa kota - lun guru ka lun - go and chup your guru gobind lun
#7 Jun 17, 2013
THE POINT IS CLEAR
DEFEAT hARAMI hINDUS AND
BRING IN iSLAMIC FLAG
SO COME JOIN ISLAMIC BROTHERHOOD
ISLAM CLEARLY HAS LAWS THAT MAKE HUMAN CLEAN
AND KEEP HYIGINE
SO COME JOIN ISLAM
DEFEAT HARAMI HINDUS
LET ISLAM PREVAIL IN INDIA
Central District, Hong Kong
#8 Jun 17, 2013
answer me do sikhs are clean
Add your comments below
|'Canadians don't understand the basics': Expert...||4 hr||Typical High Scho...||1|
|6 places to visit near Jacksonville this Halloween||7 hr||Jalapeno__||1|
|What is the secret to Asian academic success?||15 hr||Spotted Girl||5|
|Some Vermonters may get religion as vaccine out...||16 hr||Hi sexy||3|
|Doctors anticipate nasty flu season||Mon||VACCINE DAMAGE||2|
|The ABCs of anti-bullying strategies||Mon||Birds Landing Bob||1|
|MovieStarPlanet (PUMPCHKIN) (Feb '13)||Mon||Laura Sibbie162354||188|
Find what you want!
Search Kids Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC