Activist: 40% of kids who get aid fro...

Activist: 40% of kids who get aid from vaccine court have autism

There are 12 comments on the Houston Chronicle story from May 25, 2011, titled Activist: 40% of kids who get aid from vaccine court have autism. In it, Houston Chronicle reports that:

Three years ago, our government conceded that a beautiful red-haired girl, whose vaccines changed the course of her life by causing severe autism and an intractable seizure disorder, should be compensated for the resulting 24/7 care she would need lifelong.A They hastily cautioned, though, that little Hannah Poling was one of a kind.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Houston Chronicle.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#1 May 25, 2011
The Governments response was
"The government has never compensated, nor has it ever been ordered to compensate, any case based on a determination that autism was actually caused by vaccines. We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures. Some children who have been compensated for vaccine injuries may have shown signs of autism before the decision to compensate, or may ultimately end up with autism or autistic symptoms, but we do not track cases on this basis.

The fact is,what the Gov has compensated for often can look like autism, or later a co-morbid was diagnosed. The Gov also doesn't track those who were vaccinated and later needed braces on their teeth. The cases that sued an won in court did not present their cases as autism.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#3 May 25, 2011
I never blamed the children, sorry. Nice anti vaxxer try.
There was no cover-up, only in your mind.
FBOMBER

Winnipeg, Canada

#5 May 28, 2011
So, can we trust government's insistence that vaccines don't cause autism when they play semantic shell games with compensation? Are they doing this to protect Pharma, or to save face, or just to mislead the public? All the above?
FBOMBER

Winkler, Canada

#6 Jun 20, 2011
So why did the U.S.A. government have to save Pharma from being sued out of business? Why did it set up a vaccine injury compensation program and a vaccine damage court? Why was that not enough, so Pharma was granted blanket immunity from all forms of litigation? Why do "safe" vaccines get so much unnecessary protection?

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#7 Jun 21, 2011
This is the United States, and has nothing to do with Canada. The government has never compensated, nor has it ever been ordered to compensate, any case based on a determination that autism was actually caused by vaccines.

But hear from an anti vaxxer, they'll tell you different.

Of those encephalopathy which were compensated, it's fair to say the children could had been later diagnosed with ADHD, OCD, bi-polar, or ere in a car crash, doesn't mean vaccines had anything to do with it.
FBOMBER

Winnipeg, Canada

#8 Jun 21, 2011
friend wrote:
This is the United States, and has nothing to do with Canada. The government has never compensated, nor has it ever been ordered to compensate, any case based on a determination that autism was actually caused by vaccines.
But hear from an anti vaxxer, they'll tell you different.
Of those encephalopathy which were compensated, it's fair to say the children could had been later diagnosed with ADHD, OCD, bi-polar, or ere in a car crash, doesn't mean vaccines had anything to do with it.
Like I said, semantics. Everything you list except car crash are vaccine caused. Your corrupt government sides with Pharma and protects them from the public when they should be protecting the public from Pharma.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#9 Jun 21, 2011
Riiiight, whatever you say, anti vaxxer. We expect as much, or in your case, so little.
FBOMBER

Winnipeg, Canada

#10 Jun 21, 2011
friend wrote:
Riiiight, whatever you say, anti vaxxer. We expect as much, or in your case, so little.
What a joke of a comeback. Whats happened to the person who used to have something relevant to post...oh yeah, that wasn't you..disregard pro-vaxxer

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#11 Jun 21, 2011
Back to topic....
friend wrote:
The Governments response was
"The government has never compensated, nor has it ever been ordered to compensate, any case based on a determination that autism was actually caused by vaccines. We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures. Some children who have been compensated for vaccine injuries may have shown signs of autism before the decision to compensate, or may ultimately end up with autism or autistic symptoms, but we do not track cases on this basis.
The fact is,what the Gov has compensated for often can look like autism, or later a co-morbid was diagnosed. The Gov also doesn't track those who were vaccinated and later needed braces on their teeth. The cases that sued an won in court did not present their cases as autism.
FBOMBER

Winkler, Canada

#12 Jun 22, 2011
friend wrote:
Back to topic....
<quoted text>
Read the title: 40% have autism. What part of that don't you get?
Vaccines DO cause autism

Winnipeg, Canada

#13 Aug 18, 2013
FBOMBER wrote:
As you can see, friend is all about deception, denial and deflection. Sounds like a good sociopathic Pharma employee or candidate. Somehow she thinks I mentioned children in my post, but even if I did, friend has shown no sympathy for them what so ever. Must be nice in ways to be emotionless, cold and ignorant. You can ignore the worst of things and maybe even get great joy from other's suffering and pain. All you need is a small loophole, like parent's could have simply chosen not to vaccinate. Well lets just turn back time and take care of that insignificant detail. The fact that vaccines are faulty and fraudulent, and dangerous isn't worth friend's consideration.
Well said
Vaccines DO cause autism

Winnipeg, Canada

#14 Aug 18, 2013
FBOMBER wrote:
So why did the U.S.A. government have to save Pharma from being sued out of business? Why did it set up a vaccine injury compensation program and a vaccine damage court? Why was that not enough, so Pharma was granted blanket immunity from all forms of litigation? Why do "safe" vaccines get so much unnecessary protection?
On a roll...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Family Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Undocumented Mom Of 3 U.S. Citizen Kids Deporte... 9 min Memo From Turner 97
News Sex in the family bed: Does it happen? (Jul '11) 55 min disagree 97
News Three Egyptian Christian Teens to Stand Trial f... 1 hr APOCALYPSE 3
News Best phone to track your kids? -- OrlandoSentin... (Jun '07) 22 hr kathy 10
News Perryville couple arrested for alleged identify... 23 hr Catfish-Culture 7
News Lights, camera, action for filming of pilot for... (Jan '09) Thu Paraturtle 55
News 'Gay conversion' therapists find safe haven in ... Thu Undie Concerned F... 4
More from around the web