In other words, here, the poster is repeating a point upon which two lines of attack have opened his assertions to *GRAVE* doubt:And FYI molesting is just that ,molesting. Grooming is the way to program them for your desires, nothing like trying to trivialize a point. Is that the best you can do?
1. the assertion that if what he said is true,*LOGIC* dictates that the antigay would take it into courts of law nationwide;
2. the assertion that the poster is lying outright.
This was surely unintended humor. We're reading this poster's *train wreck of a series of responses*; we're well aware some kids are "really messed up."And by the way, there are many a kid really messed up ,
This is, in fact, a possible point. The poster may have a point about its being "worse" if it's the same sex.I never said you could turn a kid Gay, but from what I read, it's pretty devastating, all the worse if its the same sex.
Why do I leap to defend the poster?
Tut, tut, tut.
Because think further: If what he says is true,*IT INDICTS THE ANTIGAY* and not gay people. The molester would be indicted for the molestation; the *ANTIGAY* would be indicted for the child's view or his family's view or society's view that it was literally *WORSE IF HE WERE MOLESTED BY THE SAME GENDER THAN BY THE OPPOSITE ONE*, leading us to a curious point.
I recently discussed this point on the board with someone here.
The ferocity of hatred against gays is so severe that the "gay = pedophile" claim is ubiquitous (among the antigay, mind you). Their reactions are so virulent and hysterical over the idea of molestation by the same gender
that they seem implicitly
to be *condoning molestation by the opposite gender*.