Michael Jackson's kids found him coll...

Michael Jackson's kids found him collapsed 8 years before death

There are 125 comments on the CTV story from Aug 7, 2013, titled Michael Jackson's kids found him collapsed 8 years before death. In it, CTV reports that:

From left, Prince Jackson, Prince Michael II 'Blanket' Jackson and Paris Jackson arrive on stage at the Michael Forever the Tribute Concert, at the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff, Wales, Oct. 8, 2011.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CTV.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#125 Aug 19, 2013
persephoone wrote:
<quoted text> No charges were ever filed concerning the possession of the photo, therefore, no matter what your own personoal feelings may be about it, obviously the law doesn't consider the mere possession of that photo to be anything criminal.
Once again it is necessary to point out to you that NO legal doucments exist which prove that MJ was a pedophile.
Pedophone, the photo was used in court, as evidence of Michael's untoward behavior with young children. I ought to be shocked you wouldn't see a red flag when a grown man owns a nude photo of a child he slept with.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

I am curious, though. How long have you belonged to NAMBLA?

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#126 Aug 19, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
i don't know what to believe anymore when it comes to this planet and its media etc.etc...


Of course you don't. You have a bad case of Celebrity Worship Syndrome and don't want to face the fact the legal documents prove Michael was a pedophile.

By the way, you still haven't answered my question.

Why would a grown man sleep with a little boy and keep a nude photo of him?

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#127 Aug 19, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
No-one said it was illegal to own. The question is why would a grown man who spent his life sleeping with boys own a picture of a nude boy he bedded? Does this not raise questions for you? You're behaving like you're a lawyer - Why dont you answer this question like a logical and rational human being?
I think Pedophone has had personal experience with this. You should see what the creep posted about gawky teenagers in a bedroom when a nude man walks from his shower into that bedroom. The remarks ooze NAMBLA.

“Waiting for f'loons to wake up”

Since: Dec 06

Goofybaboon's Not Listening

#128 Aug 19, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Pedophone has had personal experience with this. You should see what the creep posted about gawky teenagers in a bedroom when a nude man walks from his shower into that bedroom. The remarks ooze NAMBLA.
You must mean this one from pedophone:

http://www.topix.com/forum/law/TI2NAR0H79O1CG...

..."If, for example, an adult man is emerging from a shower and is in his own bedroom and some gawky teenager just happens to be there, I don't see why anybody should consider that to be traumatizing."
Six Figures

Spring, TX

#129 Aug 20, 2013
Nothing is going to bring Michael back. I was so shocked that he passed at 50. When you see the "This is It" footage, he doesn't look like a man about to die.
He was an amazing performer and his body didn't move like a 50 year old.

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#130 Aug 20, 2013
goodvibrations is a troll wrote:
Goodvibrations/jerkmaine/mjlos er4life/Rebecca, death threat making bafoon is Tracey Newton.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =js8mqHLNI10XX
Fake Canada Ip much.
Yeah cause Matts video show me making threats under it,NOT! Stupid twit!!

Fake Canada Ip? WTF is up with you,i live on th eother side of the world lol.

You really need to change your meds!! Still you cannot help it i guess,you have multiple personalities,look at all of your different screen names lol.
Six Figures

Spring, TX

#132 Aug 20, 2013
Go find an Elvis thread. You probably didn't like him either, but he would be more of your era. You know nothing about Michael. Feel free to exit the building. And take your white nursing knit pants with you.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#133 Aug 20, 2013
Reality_Awaits wrote:
<quoted text>
You must mean this one from pedophone:
http://www.topix.com/forum/law/TI2NAR0H79O1CG...
..."If, for example, an adult man is emerging from a shower and is in his own bedroom and some gawky teenager just happens to be there, I don't see why anybody should consider that to be traumatizing."
That is the very quote. Pedophone has yet to explain why it's perfectly natural for a naked adult man to walk from his shower into his bedroom and find a gawky teenager in it.

I swear to god the creep bathes in eau d'NAMBLA.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#135 Aug 20, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>didn't i already tell you i'm not a fan ? i am just not gonna assume anything because the news isn't talking about it,nor are there any real facts on the case posted that i can trust...and you have a case of believing everything the media tells you Mr.gullible !!! i am now done talking to you.
You have just contradicted yourself. You just said you are not going to assume anything ''because the news isn't talking about it'' and then you went on to condemn someone for believing what the media say...

What facts that were posted do you not trust, and why do you not trust them? If you are referring to legal documents, then you should know that they are 100% accurate. Not to mention it has no connection with the media.

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#138 Aug 20, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>
'
'if this is true why are the "supposed victims" not saying anything about the case anymore ?
Are you myopic? Heard about Wade Robson? It's in all the papers, Wacko Jacko fan?

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#141 Aug 21, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text> i meant the type of media used for entertainment instead of real facts dip shit ! and if this is true why are the "supposed victims" not saying anything about the case anymore ?
You did not specify which ''type'' of media you were referring to... So calling me a dip shit is a bit hypocritical.

What do you mean why they are not talking about the case? Jordan Chandler was paid a settlement from MJ to silence him. The others may not want to talk about it, especially since they receive tons of abuse and death threats from wacko fans. Lastly, its a difficult topic to talk about for some people.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#142 Aug 21, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
if hes a pedophile than i'll accept it. if no one goes back on the case presents facts again and the victims don't talk about their abuse than i'm not gonna believe anything..
What sort of a mentality is that? There is a currently a case pending with Wade Robson. But regardless, why would you only believe something if its being publicly discussed on the media? Is that not very sheep-ish of you? Do you not have your own brain?
rosalinda de la quatch

Sweden

#143 Aug 21, 2013
persephoone wrote:
<quoted text> No charges were ever filed concerning the possession of the photo, therefore, no matter what your own personoal feelings may be about it, obviously the law doesn't consider the mere possession of that photo to be anything criminal.
Once again it is necessary to point out to you that NO legal doucments exist which prove that MJ was a pedophile.
Out of complete curiosity what is your general opinion on pedophiles and do you think the current criminal system of the United States of North America hands out adequate prison sentences to them ?

Also if a celebrity worshiper like yourself is not believing that the legal documents which document on all of MJ's very disturbing and questionable behavior regarding young boys is not proof of him being a monstrous pedophile then why do you get so worked up in extreme anger and frustration if you are believing in that theory ?
rosalinda de la quatch

Sweden

#144 Aug 21, 2013
persephoone wrote:
<quoted text> Many logical and rational human beings would be mystified about your seemingly irrational, over-the-top response about a single photograph which was not implicated in any criminal wrongdoing.
Do you know the story behind that particular photograph? Do you know in what circumstances the photo was taken? Do you know anything about the boy, his family, and his connection with MJ?
Why are you labeling it an over-the-top response ? Or is that pointless asking a person of your type ? Also people are not questioning whether MJ owned child pornography but that MJ the man who meticulously planned to get children into his bed owned naked images of young boys exactly the same age that he was meticulously planning to get into his bed correct?

Has it not occurred to you that it is unbelievably suspicious that a man would owned such material yes? It is like a suspected drug dealer - yes? If you find certain items around his home that are connected with drug dealing then it is suspicious even if no illegal substance are found yes?

Also you are questioning the photo in claiming we do not know the history behind it or what circumstances it was taken in yes? But that also means you have absolutely no idea whether that photo of the naked boy he was sleeping with got into MJ's hands in a legitimate manner or whether MJ took it himself yes?

But it doesn't matter technically as that picture was just another part of the jigsaw puzzle yes? As MJ owned books which are recommended on the pedophile organization of North America of your country correct? That in and of itself is unbelievably suspicious yes? There isn't a single decent human being on this planet who would ever support that sick and filthy organization correct? They are scumbags and anybody who buys their recommended material is as sick and twisted as them correct?

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#147 Aug 21, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>oh ok then,im sorry :( but im not sure what to believe. especially sense the alot of the media is made up of lies instea of facts. so the question is what is true and what isn't ? theres alot of things about this world that we may never know or fully understand...
The media can report false information, which is why I use reliable sources when backing up my claims and information.

If you dont know what to believe, then simply look at MJ's case from a non bias perspective. You will find plenty of questionable things MJ was involved in. You can find these in official court documents. You just make up your mind from there

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#148 Aug 21, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>well than where is the real info huh ? up your ass ? if some people don't start presenting real facts than i have nothing to believe about the case.
What facts would you like? Be specific. Theres plenty of facts I can present that prove some of his questionable behaviour.

I can give you one example. MJ kept and locked away ''art'' books of nude boys in his cabinet. Books that have been conducted by pedophiles. He also kept polaroid photographs of a naked boy he bedded and of another boy with his underwear partially pulled down. THESE ARE FACTS.- Here is the evidence:

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#151 Aug 21, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
wait a sec..2005 ? should he have been in prison then ? he was still alive back then...oh well he is dead now, so i guess there is no point in continuing to talk about it :/...
Those books were technically legal to own along with the photographs, so he would not have gone to jail for that.

And he was perceived as innocent and ''pure'' because of the persona he portrayed, its a common tactic amongst pedophiles.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#153 Aug 21, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>yeah i know..kinda like a serial killer..look normal on the outside,but are evil on the inside.i guess its a thing with criminals. although i'm still not sure whether he did those crimes or not...
Exactly. And this is just something you have to look into properly if you want answers. Chances are, you will believe he was guilty, Unless you are a die-hard MJ fan.

A boy also correctly described his genitals. MJ fans will say it was inaccurate, but thats a lie. They will also claim he said it was circumcised.. thats another false rumour.

Since: Jul 10

Germany

#155 Aug 21, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
Okay folks, I think we've got a three-way user-name here. PISHPASH1234 , ARE YOU MYNIKI813 ? I think you're having a conversation with yourself, and making it liook like you just convinced someone that michael was a pedophile. I CAN TELL by the tone of your wording. Plus myniki813 seemed mildly confused and you said, read this , and the comment is ok i believe now, no bub, it doesnt work that easy. YOUR CREATING A FAKE DEBATE with yourself. ALSO LIKE YOUR A.K.A. lenis disgusted you give your pattern away by linking us to death. So folks , Len is disgusted ,pishpash1234 , and mynki813 , are most likely the same person. Nobody is so helpless and easily convinced of anything on this forum, correct?
"Being slightly paranoid is like being slightly pregnant - it tends to get worse."

:)

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#156 Aug 22, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>didn't i already tell you i'm not a fan ? i am just not gonna assume anything because the news isn't talking about it,nor are there any real facts on the case posted that i can trust...and you have a case of believing everything the media tells you Mr.gullible !!! i am now done talking to you.
Refusal to answer the question has been noted. I'm going to repeat it, again. Why would a grown man keep a nude photo of a little boy he slept with? Here's the link to the legal documents, where it discussed and which you refuse to acknowledge is proof Michael was a a pedophile.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

If you weren't a fan, you wouldn't be here, trying to convince us there is no proof he molested children. You display all the classic symptoms of f'loonhood.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Family Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 2 dead, 17 wounded in shooting at Kentucky high... 1 hr Chilli J 839
News The Latest: Jimmy Kimmel squarely blames Trump,... 2 hr The Mule 89
News Coalition forms to feed students during school ... 3 hr Tyrone 9
News Jimmy Kimmel Blames Trump, GOP After School Sho... 6 hr papa 6
News The Transgender Totalitarians Can Now Legally T... 8 hr TerriB1 1
News Morning Bell: Lawmakers stand behind race riot ... 9 hr rearview 1
News Leader of 'A Perfect Cause' calls for Gov. Fall... 19 hr nothingsperfect 1
More from around the web